Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T08:09:46.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theory on the biology of lateral dominance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Arnold R. Kaplan
Arnold R. Kaplan*
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, School of Medicine, George Washington University

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The literature and results of studies on the subject of lateral dominance have been reviewed and discussed, and pertinent hypotheses advanced. The various known facts need not be considered contradictory if multiple genetic factors are hypothesized, interacting with an ontogenetic predisposition to left cerebral (and right somatic) dominance, and with various psychological-social factors.

Riassunto

RIASSUNTO

Sono stati riesaminati e discussi la letteratura ed i risultati degli studi sull'argomento della dominanza laterale e sono state avanzate alcune ipotesi pertinenti.

I vari fatti noti non vanno considerati contradittori, se si faccia l'ipotesi di fattori genetici multipli, agenti in collaborazione ad una predisposizione ontogenetica a dominanza cerebrale sinistra (e somatica destra) ed a svariati fattori psicologico-sociali.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉ

La littérature et les résultats des études sur la dominance latérale ont été réexaminés et discutés en faisant quelques hypothèses possibles.

Les faits divers connus ne sont pas en contradiction entre eux si l'on fait l'hypothèse de l'existence de facteurs génétiques multiples, agissants en collaboration avec une prédisposition ontogénique à dominance cérébrale gauche (et somatique droite) et avec plusieurs facteurs psychologiques-sociaux.

Zusammenfassung

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Die Litteratur und die Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen über die Seitendominanz werden wiederuntersucht und diskutiert und einige Hypothesen vorgestellt.

Die verschiedene bekannte Vorfälle werden nicht als widersprechende betrachtet, wenn man vielfache genetische Faktoren annimt, die mit einer ontogenischen Neigung zu linker Gehirn-(und rechter somatischen) Dominanz und zu verschiedenen psychologisch-sozialen Faktoren arbeitet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , July 1960 , pp. 318 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1960

References

1. Bakwin, H.: Lateral dominance, right and left handedness. J. Pediat., 36: 385–391, 1950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bauer, R. W. and Wepman, J. M.: Lateralization of cerebral functions. J. Speech Hear. Dis., 20: 171–177, 1955.Google Scholar
3. Berner, G. E. and Berner, D. E.: Relation of ocular dominance, handedness, and the controlling eye in binocular vision. Arch. Ophthalmol., 50: 603–608, 1953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Bijou, S. W.: Laterality as a clinical problem. Del. St. J. Med., 10: 115–118, 1938.Google Scholar
5. Brain, W. R.: Speech and cerebral function. Brain, 64: 244–265, 1941.Google Scholar
6. Bushrova, J. V.: The primitive formation of functional asymmetry of the hands in association with differentiation of spatial directions. Izv. Akad. Ped. Nauk. R. S. F. S. R., 83: 37–46, 1956.Google Scholar
7. Buxton, C. E.: A comparison of preference and motor learning measures in handedness. J. Exp. Psychol., 21: 464–469, 1937.Google Scholar
8. Byrom, E. T.: The left-dominant child. Tex. St. J. Med., 43: 782–785, 1948.Google Scholar
9. Chamberlain, H. B.: Inheritance of left-handedness. J. Hered., 19: 557–559, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Chance, B.: Eye and hand. Am. J. Ophthalmol., 41: 716–718, 1956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Cole, J.: Paw preference in cats related to hand preference in animals and man. Physiol. Psychol., 48: 137–140, 1955.Google Scholar
12. Cuff, N. B.: A study of eyedness and handedness. J. Exp. Psychol., 14: 164–165, 1931.Google Scholar
13. Cummins, H. and Midlo, C.: Finger Prints, Palms and Soles; an Introduction to Dermatoglyphics. New York: Blakiston, 1943.Google Scholar
14. Falek, A.: A Family Study of Handedness. Ph. D. Dissertation. New York: Columbia University, 1957.Google Scholar
15. Falek, A.: Handedness: a family study. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 11: 52–62, 1959.Google Scholar
16. Frauchiger, E.: Das Problem der Handigkeit im Lichte neurologischer und hirnanatomischer Forschung. Wien Arch. Psychol. Psychiat. Neurol., 3: 84–89, 1953.Google Scholar
17. Friedman, J. H., Golomb, J., and Mora, M. N.: The hair whorl sign for handedness. Dis. Nerv. System, 13: 208–216, 1952.Google Scholar
18. Gesell, A. and Ames, L.: Tonic neck-reflex and symmetro-tonic behavior. J. Pediat., 36: 165–176, 1950.Google Scholar
19. Gilinsky, A. S.: A review of the literature on the relative efficiency of the dominant and non-dominant eye. W. A. D. C. Tech. Rep. (Wright Air Development Center): 13–52, 1952.Google Scholar
20. Hillebrandt, F. A. and Houtz, S.J.: Ergographic study of hand dominance. AM. J. Phys. Anthrop., 8: 225–236, 1950.Google Scholar
21. Hofstaedter, R.: Social Darwinism in American Thought. New York: Braziller, 1959.Google Scholar
22. Humphrey, M. E. and Zangwill, O. L.: Effects of a right-sided occipito-parietal brain injury in a left-handed man. Brain, 75: 312–324, 1952.Google Scholar
23. Kaplan, A. R.: Chromatographic Studies of Genetic Aspects of Human Urinary Amino Acid Excretory Patterns. Ph. D. Dissertation. Austin: University of Texas, 1956.Google Scholar
24. Kaplan, A. R.: A study of familial aspects of human urinary amino acid excretory patterns utilizing paper chromatography. A. Ge. Me. Ge., 8: 195–200, 1959.Google ScholarPubMed
25. Kaplan, A. R.: Darwin's The Origin of Species and the modern concept of evolution. Tex. J. Sci., 7: 389–395, 1955.Google Scholar
26. Kaplan, A. R.: Biochemical studies in schizophrenia. Eugen. Quart., 5: 86–94 1958.Google Scholar
27. Kaplan, A. R.: Unpublished observations on brains and cranial vaults of cadavers. Washington, D. C.: George Washington Univ. Med. Schl., 1960.Google Scholar
28. Komai, T. and Fukuoka, G.: A study on the frequency of left-handedness and left-footedness among Japanese school children. Hum. Biol., 6: 33–42, 1934.Google Scholar
29. Myrianthopoulos, N.: Personal communication. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, 1959.Google Scholar
30. Obholzer, A.: Should a hémiplégie arm be treated? Infantile cerebral palsy and speech disorders. S. Afr. Med. J., 26: 653–654, 1952.Google Scholar
31. Peterson, G. M. and Fracarol, L. C.: The relative influence of the locus and mass of destruction upon the control of handedness by the cerebral cortex. J. Comp. Neurol., 68: 173–190, 1938.Google Scholar
32. Peterson, G. M. and McGiboney, D. R. Jr.: Reeducation of handedness in the rat following cerebral injuries. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 44: 191–196, 1951.Google Scholar
33. Provins, K. A.: Handedness and skill. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol., 8: 79–95, 1956.Google Scholar
34. Ramaley, F.: Inheritance of lefthandedness. Amer. Nat., 47: 730–738, 1913.Google Scholar
35. Riese, W.: The brain of Dr. Trigant Brown, physician, scientist, and author. J. Comp. Neurol., 100: 525–567, 1954.Google Scholar
36. Rife, D. C.: Handedness with a special reference to twins. Genetics, 25: 178–186, 1940.Google Scholar
37. Rothschild, K.: Relation of Broca's center to lefthandedness. Amer. J. Med. Sci., 182: 116–118, 1931.Google Scholar
38. Roumajon, M.: Les troubles du langage chez les gauchers. Rev. Neuropsychiat. Infant. Hyg. Ment. Enfance, 3: 567–570, 1955.Google Scholar
39. Shy, G. M.: Personal communication. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health, 1959.Google Scholar
40. Smith, K. U. and Akelaitis, A.J.: Studies on the corpus callosum. Arch. Neurol. & Psychiat., 47: 519–543, 1942.Google Scholar
41. Sorsby, A.: Clinical Genetics. St. Louis: Mosby, 1953.Google Scholar
42. Subirama, A., Corominas, J., Puncernan, R., Oler-Daurella, L., and Monteys, J.: Nueva contribution al estudio de la dominancia cerebral. Medicamenta, 10: 255–258, 1952.Google Scholar
43. Watson, J. B. and Watson, R. R.: Studies in infant psychology. Sci. Monthly, 13: 493–515, 1921.Google Scholar
44. Wegener, H.: Zur Morphologie und Genese der Linkshandigkeit. Zeitschr. Morphol. u. Anthropol., 45: 135–145, 1952.Google Scholar
45. Zangwill, O. L.: Agraphia due to a left parietal glioma in a left-handed man. Brain, 77: 510–520, 1954.Google Scholar