Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T22:18:20.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structuring of Self and Twinship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

F. Castellet y Ballarà*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatric Science and Medical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy
E. Bollea
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatric Science and Medical Psychology, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Italy
*
Viale dei Colli Portuensi 122, 00151 Rome, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Latest psychoanalytical research, based on the integration of the genetic-reconstructive method and the observative-developmental one, points out that twinship presents specific difficulties in the structuring of Self. The unfavourable feature in the structuring of Self in twins is the sharing of the mother from the very beginning of in-trauterine cohabitation passing to the relative deficiency of primary maternal care. The clinical cases of two adult DZ twins under psychoanalytical – psychotherapy treatment are herein reported to emphasize: the defective formation of a sense of personal identity; the high recurrence of cross-projective identifications; and, the tendency to assume complementary roles and re-create bonds and relationships similar to the ones experienced with the cotwin. Within the therapeutic relationship, the following features come to light: the unconsciously fantasized presence of the other twin; the strong feelings of self depreciation, inability and angry emptiness. These feelings seem to enhance an adhesive transference, presenting difficulties in separating, strong ambivalence and fantasies of a continuous analysis with the analyst-twin. In the cases we report, the twin pair relationship with its dynamics, bound to the incomplete or defective structuring of Self, represents the essence of the relationship between the twin and the object.

Type
Oral Communications and Poster Abstracts
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1994

References

REFERENCES

1. Athanassiou, C (1986): A study of the vicissitudes of identification in twins. Int J. Psycho-Anal vol. 67:329335.Google Scholar
2. Athanassiou, C (1991): Construction of a transitional space in an infant twin girl. Int Rev of Psycho-Anal vol. 18:5363.Google Scholar
3. Calvesi, A (1979): Angoscia di scissione gemellare del Sé o angoscia di perdita di una metà del Sé in una gemella monovulare. Riv Psicoanal, 1:3849.Google Scholar
4. Costantini, MV, Mondino, C, Munari, F (1987): Il gemello, una simbiosi. Emergenza e strutturazione del Sé. Riv Psicol Clinica 2:215226.Google Scholar
5. Davison, S (1992): Mother, other and self-love and rivalry for twins in their first year of life. Int J Psyco-Anal 19:359374.Google Scholar
6. De Astis, A (1989): Relazione nevrotica infantile nella coppia gemellare in funzione del rapporto di coppia genitoriale. In Giannotti, A & G, De Astis, G (eds): II diseguale. Borla.Google Scholar
7. Kohut, H (1984): How Does Analysis Cure? Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press; Ital. trad. ‘La cura psicoanalitica’. Boringhieri, 1986.Google Scholar
8. Stella, S (1989): Note su alcuni processi d'individuazione in gemelli adulti non-identici. In Valente Torre, L (ed): I gemelli: il vissuto del doppio, Firenze: La Nuova Italia Ed. pp. 139148.Google Scholar
9. Stern, DN (1985): The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
10. Turillazzi Manfredi, S (1985): L'Unicorno: saggio sulla fantasia e l'oggetto nel concetto d'identificazione proiettiva. Riv Psicoanal 31 (4):462477.Google Scholar