Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T22:43:28.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secular Trend and Associated Factors of Twinning in Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C.J. Chen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei
T.K. Lee
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei
C.J. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, National Cheng-Kung University College of Medicine, Tainan, Taiwan
M.W. Yu
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei
*
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, 1, Jen-Ai Road Section 1, Taipei 10018, Taiwan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Delivery records of public hospitals and local health centers were analyzed to investigate the secular trend of multiple births from 1955 to 1990 in Taiwan. Twinning rates decreased gradually from the late 1950s to 1973, slightly increased and remained stable from 1974 to 1980, and then increased strikingly from 1981 to 1990. During the study period, MZ rates were consistently higher than DZ rates except in 1986 when a higher DZ rate was observed. The highest MZ rate of 7.7 per 1,000 deliveries was observed in 1985, while the highest DZ rate of 4.6 per 1,000 deliveries was observed in 1986. The triplet incidence rate also declined from the early 1960s to 1973 and then increased markedly from 1974 to 1990. A case-control study including 482 MZ and 252 DZ twin pairs and 1,496 singletons was carried out in four teaching hospitals in Taipei City between October 1985 and June 1989 to examine factors related to twinning. The zygosity of twin pairs was determined by sex, placentation and red blood cell antigens. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the higher the maternal age, the lower the MZ and DZ rates, while the higher the parity, the higher the rates. There was no association of paternal age or of maternal educational level with twinning rates

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Anderson, WJR (1956): Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in twin pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 63:205215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Arey, LB (1923): The cause of tubal pregnancy and tubal twinning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 5:163167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bonnelykke, B (1990): Social class and human twinning. J Biosoc Sci 22:381386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Bulmer, MG (1958): The repeat frequency of twinning. Ann Hum Genet 23:3135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Bulmer, MG (1959): The effect of parental age, parity and duration of marriage on the twinning rate. Ann Hum Genet 23:454458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Bulmer, MG (1976): Is Weinberg's method valid? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25:2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chen, CJ, Lin, TM, Chang, C, Cheng, YJ (1987): Epidemiological characteristics of twinning rates in Taiwan. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36:335342.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Czeizel, A, Acsadi, G (1971): Demographic characteristics of multiple births in Hungary. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 20:301313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Czeizel, A (1973): Unexplained demographic phenomena of multiple births in Hungary. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 22:214218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Republic of China (1990): Health Statistics. Taipei: Department of Health.Google Scholar
11. Elwood, JM (1973): Changes in the twinning rate in Canada 1926-1970. Br J Prev Soc Med 27:236241.Google Scholar
12. Elwood, JM (1978): Maternal and environmental factors affecting twin births in Canadian cities. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 85:351358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Emery, AEH (1986): Identical twinning and oral contraception. Eugen Soc Symp 3:2327.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Eriksson, AW, Fellman, J (1967): Twinning in relation to the marital status of the mother. Acta Genet (Basel) 17:385398.Google Scholar
15. Eriksson, AW, Eskola, MR, Fellman, JO (1976): Retrospective studies on the twinning rate of Scandinavia. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25:2935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Gedda, L (1961): Twins in history and science. Springfield, Illinois: Charles Thomas.Google Scholar
17. James, WH (1975): The secular decline in dizygotic twinning rates in Italy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 24:914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. James, WH (1978): A hypothesis on the declining dizygotic twinning rates in developed countries. Prog Clinic Biol Res 24:8188.Google ScholarPubMed
19. James, WH (1986): Recent secular trends in dizygotic twinning. J Biosoc Sci 18:497504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Kaufman, MH, O'Shea, KS (1978): Induction of monozygotic twinning in the mouse. Nature (Lond) 276-707-708.Google Scholar
21. Macourt, DC, Stewart, P, Zaki, M (1982): Multiple pregnancy and fetal abnormalities in association with oral conceptive usage. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 22:2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Millis, J (1959): The frequency of twinning in poor Chinese in the maternity hospital Singapore. Ann Hum Genet 23:171174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Nylander, PPS (1975): Factors which influence twinning rates. In MacGillivary, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (eds): Human Multiple Reproduction. London: WB Saunders, pp. 98106.Google Scholar
24. Nylander, PPS (1981): The factors that influence twinning rates. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 30:189202.Google ScholarPubMed
25. Rola-Janiki, A (1974): Multiple births in Poland 1949-71. In Parisi, P. (ed): Multiple births and twin care Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22.Google Scholar
26. Stockard, CR (1921): Developmental rate and structural expression: an experimental study of twins “double monsters” and single deformities and the interaction among embryonic organs during their origin and development. Am J Anat 28:115277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar