Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:17:49.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Northwestern University Triplet Study. II: Fourteen Triplet Pregnancies Delivered between 1981 and 1986

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L.G. Keith*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical Schooland Prentice Women's Hospital and Maternity Center, Chicago
S. Ameli
Affiliation:
Presently, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedar Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
O.R. Depp
Affiliation:
Presently, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
J. Hobart
Affiliation:
Evanston Hospital, Evanston, Illinois
D.M. Keith
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Multiple Birth, Chicago, Illinois, USA
*
Prentice Women's Hospitaland Maternity Center, Suite 476, 333 East Superior Street, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fourteen triplet deliveries conducted between 1 January 1981 and 30 June 1986 at the principal teaching hospitals of Northwestern University Medical School are reviewed. Maternal demographic characteristics are listed, as are the obstetric outcomes, including mode of delivery, and the fetal outcome. The recent literature of triplet delivery is reviewed.

The rate of triplet delivery in our study was 0.37 per 1,000 live births. About two-thirds of the pregnancies resulted from the use of fertility-inducing agents. Ultrasonic confirmation was available in all cases. The majority of women were delivered by cesarean section (85%). No consistent pattern of presentation was seen. The mean weight of all 42 infants was 1,779 g (± 594). Unlike-sex triplets accounted for most of the sets (77%). The mean 5-min Apgar score of all infants was 9 and had no association with the order of deliveries. The weight differences by sex regardless of birth order were clinically insignificant. Neonatal mortality was 2.3%

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Barter, RH, Hsu, I, Erkenbeck, RV, Pugsley, LQ (1965): The prevention of prematurity in multiple pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 91:787796.Google Scholar
2.Bell, D, Johansson, D, McLean, FH, Usher, RH (1986): Birth asphyxia, trauma, and mortality in twins: Has cesarean section improved outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:235239.Google Scholar
3.Brackenridge, CJ (1978): Aspects of the increasing triplet rate in Australia. J Biosoc Sci 10:183188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Collins, J, Merrick, D, David, R, Ameli, S, Ogada, ES (1986): The Northwestern University triplet study. III: Neonatal outcome. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 37:7780.Google Scholar
5.Creinin, M, MacGregor, S, Socol, M, Hobart, J, Ameli, S, Keith, L (1988): The Northwestern Triplet Study IV. Biochemical Parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol, in press.Google Scholar
6.Daw, E (1978): Triplet pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 85:505509.Google Scholar
7.Deale, CJC, Cronjé, HS (1984): A review of 367 triplet pregnancies. SA Med J 66:9294.Google Scholar
8.Egwuatu, VE (1980): Triplet pregnancy: A review of 27 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 18:460464.Google Scholar
9.Ellis, RF, Berger, GS, Keith, L, Depp, R (1979): The Northwestern University Multihospital Twin Study. II. Mortality of first versus second twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:347352.Google Scholar
10.Hartikainen-Sorri, A-L (1985): Is routine hospitalization in twin pregnancy necessary? A follow-up study. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:189192.Google Scholar
11.Hartikainen-Sorri, A-L, Jouppila, P (1984): Is routine hospitalization needed in antenatal care of twin pregnancy? J Perinat Med 12:3134.Google Scholar
12.Hartikainen-Sorri, A-L, Kauppila, A, Tuimala, R, Koivisto, M (1983): Factors related to an improved outcome for twins. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 62:2325.Google Scholar
13.Hughey, MJ (1986): Personal communication.Google Scholar
14.Imaizumi, Y, Inouye, E (1980): Analysis of multiple birth rates in Japan. III. Secular trend, maternal age effect and geographical variation in triplet rates. Jpn J Hum Genet 25:7381.Google Scholar
15.Itzković, D (1979): A survey of 59 triplet pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86:2328.Google Scholar
16.James, WH (1982): Second survey of secular trends in twinning rates. J Biosoc Sci 14:481497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Jeanneret, O, MacMahon, B (1962): Secular changes in rates of multiple births in the United States. Am J Hum Genet 14:410425.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Kappel, B, Hansen, KB, Möller, J, Faaborg-Andersen, J (1985): Bed rest in twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:6771.Google Scholar
19.Katz, M, Newman, RB, Gill, PJ (1986): Assessment of uterine activity in ambulatory patients at high risk of preterm labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:4447.Google Scholar
20.Keith, LG, Newton, WP (1985): Twin gestation. In Sciana, JW (ed): Gynecology and Obstetrics. Philadelphia: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
21.Keith, L, Ellis, R, Berger, GS, Depp, R (1980): The Northwestern University Multihospital Twin Study. I: A description of 588 twin pregnancies and associated pregnancy loss, 1971 to 1975. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:781785.Google Scholar
22.Keith, L, Ameli, S, Keith, DM (1986): The Northwestern University Triplet Study. I: Overview of the international literature. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 37:5563.Google Scholar
23.Leroy, B, Lefort, F, Risse, RJ, Trevise, P, Jeny, R (1982): Intrauterine growth charts for twin fetuses. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 31:199206.Google Scholar
24.Marivate, M, Norman, RJ (1982): Twins. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 9:723742.Google Scholar
25.Michlewitz, H, Kennedy, J, Kawada, C, Kennison, R (1981): Triplet pregnancies. J Reprod Med 26:243246.Google Scholar
26.Misenhimer, HR, Kaltreider, DF (1978): Effects of decreased prenatal activity in patients with twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 51:692694.Google Scholar
27.Muir, DG, Belsey, MA (1980): Pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in the developing world. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:913.Google Scholar
28.Newman, RB, Gill, PJ, Katz, M (1986): Uterine activity during pregnancy in ambulatory patients: Comparison of singleton and twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154:530531.Google Scholar
29.Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (1974): Placentation and zygosity of triplets and higher multiple births in Ibadan, Nigeria. Ann Hum Genet 34:417426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.O'Connor, MC, Arias, E, Royston, JP, Dalrymple, IJ (1981): The merits of special antenatal care for twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88:222230.Google Scholar
31.Ollendorf, D (1986): Personal communication.Google Scholar
32.O'Neal, JR, Horn, MD, Mesick, RR (1982): Triplet pregnancies: Experience with four sets. J Med Soc N Jersey 79:653656.Google Scholar
33.Papiernik, E (1982): Social cost of twin births. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 32:105111.Google Scholar
34.Papiernik, E, Mussy, MA, Vial, M, Richard, A (1985): A low rate of perinatal deaths for twin births. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:201206.Google Scholar
35.Persson, P-H, Grennert, L (1979): The instrauterine growth of the biparietal diameter of twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:273277.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Persson, P-H, Grennert, L (1979): Towards a normalization of the outcome of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:341346.Google Scholar
37.Powers, W, Miller, T (1979): Bed rest in twin pregnancy: Identification of a criticai period and its cost implication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134:2329.Google Scholar
38.Puissant, F, Leroy, F (1982): A reappraisal of perinatal mortality factors in twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 31:213219.Google Scholar
39.Sabaggha, R, Keith, L, Dal Compo, S, Ameli, S (1986): The Northwestern University Triplet study. Ultrasonic observations. In preparation.Google Scholar
40.Schneider, KTM, Huch, A, Huch, R (1985): Premature contractions: Are they caused by maternal standing? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:175178.Google Scholar
42.Syrop, CH, Varner, MW (1985): Triplet gestation: Maternal and neonatal implications. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34:8186.Google Scholar
43.Trésmontant, R, Héluin, G, Papiernik, E (1983): Cost of care and prevention of preterm births in twin pregnancies. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 32:99103.Google Scholar
44.Wyshak, G (1978): Statistical findings on the effects of fertility drugs on plural births. In Nance, WE, Allen, G, Parisi, P (eds): Twin Research. Part B: Biology and Epidemiology. New York: Alan R Liss, pp. 1733.Google Scholar