Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T05:51:12.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Early Mother-Twin Relationships from Birth to Age 3, on Twin Bonding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

M. Robin ,
H. Kheroua  and
I. Casati
M. Robin*
Affiliation:
INSERM - CNRS, Paris, France
H. Kheroua
Affiliation:
INSERM - CNRS, Paris, France
I. Casati
Affiliation:
INSERM - CNRS, Paris, France
*
INSERM, 17 rue Ferrus, 75014 Paris, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Findings from an earlier phase of this research project clearly pointed to the mother's psycological adaptation inherent to the specificities of triadic interaction. Mothers' attitudes were classified in a typology ranging from “early twinness” where the two babies are treated as though they were a single unit, to attempts to create two dyadic relationships. The current program deals with the effects of the type of parent-child relationship at one year on the emergence of twin bonding. Sixty-eight families of twins (26MZ, 24DZ same sex, 18DZ different sex) are followed up from birth to the age of 3 using a method based on clinical interviews, videotaped observations, and questionnaires. The data cover mothers' rearing attitudes towards organization of babycare and outward signs of twinness, maternal representations of the relationship between the twins and observation of the children's interaction in a standardized game situation. The findings are discussed in terms of zygosity, and parental SCS.

Keywords

Mother-twin relationshipsTwin bondingFamily interactionsEarly childhood
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 41 , Issue 2-3 , July 1992 , pp. 143 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Ainsworth, MDS, Blehar, MC, Waters, E, Wall, S (1978): Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
2. Clark, PM, Dickman, Z (1984): Features of interaction in infant twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 165–171.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Cohen, DJ, Dibble, E, Grawe, JM, Pollin, W (1975): Reliability separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32: 1371–1375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Dibble, ED, Cohen, DJ (1984): L'influence réciproque de l'équipement biologique, de l'expérience précoce et du milieu psychosocial au cours de la première année de la vie: une étude épidémiologique sur des jumeaux. In Anthony, EJ, Chiland, C (eds): L'enfant dans sa famille Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
5. Goshen-Gottstein, ER (1980): The mothering of twins, triplets and quadruplets. Psychiatry 43: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Hay, DA, O'Brien, PJ (1983): The La Trobe Twin Study: A genetic approach to the structure and development of cognition in twin children. Child Development 54: 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hay, DA, O'Brien, PJ (1984): The role of parental attitudes in the development of temperament in twins at home, school and in test situations. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 191–204.Google ScholarPubMed
8. Hay, DA, O'Brien, PJ (1987): Early influences on the school social adjustment of twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36: 239–248.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Josse, D, Robin, M (1990): La prénomination des jumeaux: Effet de couple, effet de mode? Enfance 3–4: 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Lytton, H (1980): Parent Child Interaction: The socialization process observed in twin and singleton families. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Lytton, H, Conway, D, Sauve, R (1977): The impact of twinship on parent child interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 35: 97–107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Minde, K, Perrotta, M, Corter, C (1982): The effect of neonatal complications in same-sexed premature twins on their mothers' preference. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 21: 446–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Minde, K, Perrotta, M, Corter, C (1983): Parental preferences towards premature twins: some preliminary findings. In Schmidt, H and Remschmidt, H (eds): Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, pp. 213–225.Google Scholar
14. Minde, K, Corter, C, Golberg, S (1984): The contribution of twinship and early biological impediments to early interaction and attachment between premature infants and their mothers. In Call, JD, Galenson, E, Tyson, RL (eds), Frontiers of Infant Psychiatry II. New York: Basic Books, pp 160–196.Google Scholar
15. Minde, K, Corter, C, Golberg, S, Jeffers, D (1990): Maternal preference between premature twins up to age four. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29: 367–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Mueller, E, Brenner, J (1977): The origins of social skill and interaction among playgroup toddlers. Child Dev 48: 854–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Robin, M Josse, , Tourrette, C (1988): Early mother-twin interaction. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 37: 151–159.Google ScholarPubMed
18. Robin, M, Josse, D, Tourrette, C (1991): Forms of family reorganization following the birth of twins. Acta Genet Gemellol 40: 53–61.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Robin, M, Josse, D, Casati, I, Tourrette, C, Kheroua, H: Twinning: the physical environment of twins at one year, à paraître.Google Scholar
20. Savic, S (1980): How Twins Learn to Talk. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
21. Tourrette, C, Robin, M, Josse, D (1988): Les pratiques éducatives des mères de jumeaux: Une investigation par l'analyse factorielle des correspondances. L'Année Psychologique 88: 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Tourrette, C, Robin, M, Josse, D (1989): Treating twins as individuals: maternal educative practices. Eur J Psychol Educ 4: 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Zazzo, R (1976): The twin condition and the couple effects on personality development. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25: 343–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Zazzo, R (1984): Le Paradoxe Jumeaux, Paris: Stock/Pernoud.Google Scholar
25. Zazzo, R (1986): Les Jumeaux, le Couple et la Personne. 2ème édition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar