Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T12:43:16.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birth Weight and Congenital Absence of Teeth in Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Harris J. Keene
Harris J. Keene*
Affiliation:
Naval Dental Research Institute, Great Lakes, Illinois
*
Epidemiology Division, Naval Dental Research Institute, Great Lakes, Illinois 60088, USA

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The relationship between hypodontia and birth weight was investigated in 262 twins from the naval recruit population at Great Lakes. The overall frequency of hypodontia including third molars was 34.8%. Excluding third molars, hypodontia frequency was 11.6%. Anatomic distribution of congenitally missing teeth and frequency of third molar hypodontia were similar to other studies, but hypodontia of teeth other than third molars occurred two-three times as frequently in twins as in the general population.

The frequency of low birth weight (2500 g or less) in the twin sample was 47.7%. Hypodontia occurred more frequently in twins with low birth weight (42.6%) than in twins with birth weights over 2500 g (28.6%). Mean birth weight of twins with hypodontia was 2479 g, and without hypodontia, 2675 g. Twins with missing teeth other than third molars had a mean birth weight of 2357 g.

Mean birth weight was lower and hypodontia frequency was higher in MZ than in DZ twins. Discordances in anatomic location and number of missing teeth occurred in several MZ and DZ twin pairs. Discordances within MZ sets tended to be related to anatomic location rather than number of missing teeth. Six twin pairs (5 MZ and 1 DZ) out of 20 (13 MZ and 7 DZ) having one or more missing teeth had perfect concordance in both number and location of missing teeth. In 28 pairs neither member had hypodontia.

Mean intrapair variance in number of congenitally missing teeth was almost ten times greater in DZ than in MZ pairs, indicating the presence of a strong genetic component in connection with tooth number variability in twins.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 23 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1971

References

Allen, G., Kallmann, F. J. (1955). Frequency and types of mental retardation in twins. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 7: 15–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Axrup, K., D'Avignon, M., Hellgren, K., Henrikson, C. O., Juhlin, I. M., Larsson, K. S., Persson, G. E., Welander, E. (1966). Children with thalidomide embryopathy: odontological observations and aspects. Acta Odont. Scand., 24: 3–22.Google Scholar
Babson, S. G., Kangas, J., Young, N., Bramhall, J. L. (1964). Growth and development of twins of dissimilar size at birth. Pediatrics, 33: 327–333.Google Scholar
Barkla, D. H. (1966). Congenital absence of permanent teeth in mongols. J. Ment. Defic. Res., 10: 198–203.Google Scholar
Bender, S. (1959). Twinning and heredity. Practitioner, 183: 183–186.Google Scholar
Berg, van den B., Yerushalmy, J. (1966). The relationship of the rate of intrauterine growth of infants of low birth weight to mortality, morbidity, and congenital anomalies. J. Pediat., 69: 531–545.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. R., Carbonell, V. M., Goose, D. H. (1963). Congenital absence of teeth in human populations. In Brothwell, D.: Dental Anthropology. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Brown, R. V. (1957). The pattern and frequency of congenitally absent teeth. Iowa Dent. J., 43: 60–61.Google Scholar
Bugg, J. L. (1963). A survey of dental anomalies in deaf and blind children. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.Google Scholar
Burman, L. R. (1944). Dentition of identical twins. J. Amer. Dent. Ass., 31: 705–706.Google Scholar
Byrd, E. D. (1943). Incidence of supernumerary and ccngenitally missing teeth. J. Dent. Child., 10: 84–86.Google Scholar
Churchill, J. A. (1965). The relationship between intelligence and birth weight in twins. Neurology, 15: 341–347.Google Scholar
Clayton, J. M. (1956). Congenital dental anomalies occurring in 3,557 children. J. Dent. Child., 23: 206–208.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. M., Winer, R. A. (1965). Dental and facial characteristics in Down's syndrome (mongolism). J. Dent. Res., 44: 197–208.Google Scholar
Dolder, A. A. (1936). Zahn-Unterzahl. Schweiz. Mschr. Zahnheilk., 46: 663–701.Google Scholar
Euler, H., Ritter, R. (1939). Die Erbanlangen fur Gebiss und Zahne. In Bauer, K. H., Hanhart, E., Lange, J., Just, G.: Handbuch der Erbbiologie des Menschen. Vol. 4, part 2. Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (1944). Congenital dental defects in infants subsequent to maternal rubella during pregnancy. Med. J. Aust., 11: 225.Google Scholar
Fogel, B. J., Nitowsky, J. M., Gruenwald, P. (1965). Discordant abnormalities in monozygotic twins. J. Pediat., 66: 64–72.Google Scholar
Frykholm, K. O., Lysell, L. (1962). Different systems for the recording of teeth and tooth surfaces. Int. Dent. J., 12: 194–207.Google Scholar
Garn, S. M., Lewis, A. B., Vicinus, J. H. (1963). Third molar polymorphism and its significance to dental genetics. J. Dent. Res., 42: 1344–1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garn, S. M., Rohmann, C. G. (1966). Interaction of nutrition and genetics in the timing of growth and development. Pediat. Clin. N. Amer., 13: 353–379.Google Scholar
Gedda, L., Brenci, G., Pierelli, F., Parisi, P. (1966). Malattie, malformazioni e malposizioni dentarie studiate con il test clinico-gemellare. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 15: 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, F. B. (1961). Incidence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in a private pediodontic practice. J. Dent. Child., 28: 317–320.Google Scholar
Glenn, F. B. (1964). A consecutive six-year study of the prevalence of congenitally missing teeth in private pedodontic practice of two geographically separated areas. J. Dent. Child., 331: 264–270.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1930). The dental arches of identical twins. Dent. Cosmos, 72: 869–881.Google Scholar
Gorlin, R. J., Pindborg, J. (1964). Syndromes of the Head and Neck. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Grahnen, H. (1956). Hypodontia in the permanent dentition. Odont. Rev. (Malmo), 7: 1–100.Google Scholar
Greenberg, H. E. (1961). Congenital missing teeth. J. Amer. Dent. Ass., 63: 578.Google Scholar
Hendricks, C. H. (1966). Twinning in relation to birth weight, mortality, and congenital anomalies. Obstet. Gynec., 27: 47–53.Google Scholar
Hinrichsen, C. F. L. (1963). Ectodermal dysplasia. Aust. Dent. J., 8: 101–105.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. M. (1966). Aplasia and malocclusion: a survey and appraisal. Amer. J. Orthodont., 52: 440–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horowitz, S. L. (1963). Clinical aspects of genetic research in dentistry. J. Dent. Res., 42: 1330–1343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keene, J. H. (1965). Dental anomalies associated with low birth weight. International Association for Dental Research Program and Abstracts, 43rd General Meeting, Abstr. No. 247.Google Scholar
Keene, H. J. (1966). The relationship between maternal age and parity, birth weight and hypodontia in naval recruits. J. Dent. Child., 33: 135–147.Google Scholar
Keene, H. J. (1968a). Discordant dental development in twins. J. Dent. Res., 47: 175.Google Scholar
Keene, H. J. (1968b). Genetic and environmental factors in dental arch size variability. International Association for Dental Research, Program and Abstracts of 46th General Meeting. Abstr. No. 133.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. J. (1950). Partial anodontia:.a brief review and a case report of multiple familial incidence. Oral Surg., 3: 63–73.Google Scholar
Korkhaus, G. (1929). Die Vererbung der Anomalien der Zahnzahl. Korresp. bl. Zahnarte, 53: 435.Google Scholar
Lasker, G. W. (1950). Genetic analysis of racial traits of the teeth. Sympos. Quant. Biol., 15: 181–203.Google Scholar
McKeown, T., Record, R. G. (1952). Observations on foetal growth in multiple pregnancy in man. J. Endocr., 8: 386–401.Google Scholar
McKeown, T., Record, R. G. (1960). Malformations in a population observed for five years after birth. In Wolstenholme, G. E. W., O'Connor, C. M.: Congenital Malformations. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.Google Scholar
McMillan, R. S., Kashgarian, M. (1961). Relation of human abnormalities of structure and function to abnormalities of the dentition. II-Mongolism. J. Amer. Dent. Ass., 63: 369–375.Google Scholar
Meskin, L. H., Gorlin, R. J. (1963). Agenesis and peg-shaped permanent maxillary lateral incisors. J. Dent. Res., 42: 1476–1479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeye, R. L., Letts, H. W. (1964). Body measurements of fetal and neonatal twins. Arch. Path. (Chicago), 77: 393–396.Google ScholarPubMed
Osborne, R. H. (1962). Application of twin studies to dental research. In Witkop, C. J.: Genetics and Dental Health. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Øster, J. (1953). Mongolism, a clinicogenealogical investigation comprising 526 mongols living on Seeland and neighbouring islands in Denmark. Danish Science Press Ltd, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Praeger, W. (1924). Die Vererbungspatologie des menschlichen Gebisses. Zahnarztl. Rdsch., 35: 599.Google Scholar
Price, B. (1950). Primary biases in twin studies; a review of prenatal and natal difference-producing factors in monozygotic pairs. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 2: 293–352.Google Scholar
Putkonen, T. (1962). Dental changes in congenital syphilis. Acta Dermatovener. (Stockholm), 42: 44–62.Google Scholar
Rantanen, A. (1967). The age of eruption of the third molar teeth. Acta Odont. Scand., 25: 1–86.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. (1933). In Gedda, L.: Twins in History and Science. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, 1961.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. (1937). Über die Frage der Vererbung von Anomalien der kiefer und Zahne. Herman Meusser, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Roberts, G. L., Gardiner, J. H. (1959). Ectodermal dysplasia (hydrotic type) with partial anodontia in dizygotic twins. Dent. Pract. (Bristol), 9: 152–154.Google Scholar
Rose, J. S. (1966). A survey of congenitally missing teeth, excluding third molars, in 6000 orthodontic patients. Dent. Pract. (Bristol), 17: 107–113.Google Scholar
Siemens, H. W., Hunold, X. (1924). Zwillingspathologische TJntersuchungen der Mundhohle. Arch. Dermat. Syph., 147: 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, W. A. (1964). Dunham's Premature Infants. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Stern, L., Cranin, N. (1955). Oligodontia due to hereditary ectodermal dysplasia. Oral Surg., 8: 82–86.Google Scholar
Tanner, H. (1955). Congenitally missing tooth in one of identical twins. J. Amer. Dent. Ass., 51: 719.Google Scholar
Valinoti, J. R. (1958). The congenitally absent premolar problem. Angle Orthodont, 28: 36–45.Google Scholar
Warkany, J., Monroe, B. B., Sutherland, B. S. (1961). Intrauterine growth retardation. Amer. J. Dis. Child., 102: 249–279.Google ScholarPubMed
Werther, R., Rothenberg, F. (1939). Anodontia. Amer. J. Orthodont., 25: 61–81.Google Scholar
Weyman, J. (1968). The effect of irradiation on developing teeth. Oral Surg., 25: 623–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, P. T., Jones, H. E. (1931). A study of like-sexed twins. 1. The vital statistics and familial data of the sample. Hum. Biol., 3: 107–132.Google Scholar
Winter, G. B., Geddes, M. (1967). Oral manifestations of chondroectodermal dysplasia. Brit. Dent. J., 122: 103–107.Google Scholar
Zeiger, K., Winkler, R. (1931). Zahnunterzahl bei Zwillingen. Paradentium., 3: 20–25.Google Scholar