Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:22:54.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beginnings of Albanian Nationalist and Autonomous Trends: the albanian League, 1878-1881

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Stavro Skendi*
Affiliation:
Department of Slavic Studies, University of Toronto

Extract

During the nineteenth century a series of revolts took place in Albania. These revolts, although some of them were on a relatively large scale, were local in character and aimed neither at national autonomy nor independence. Their primary target was the taxes and the draft which the Ottoman Government, in accordance with its program of reforms—the so-called Tanzimat—was trying to impose upon the Albanian people. It was not until the Congress of Berlin that the movement began to take a different course.

When Russia defeated the Turks at the end of 1877, she imposed upon them the Treaty of San Stefano (March 3, 1878), which accorded to the Balkan Slavic nations large pieces of Albanian land. Serbia was allotted a strip of Albanian-inhabited territory in Old Serbia. Bulgaria and Montenegro were especially favored. The first country was to expand westward even into Albania, including the major part of the province of Korea (Koritza).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This article constitutes a part of a political history of Albania since 1878, which the Mid-European Studies Center has sponsored by a research grant to the author.

2 Cf. Articles 1,3, and 6 of the Treaty of San Stefano with respect to the frontiers of Montenegro, Serbia, and Bulgaria, in Effendi Noradounghian, G., Recueil d'actes internationaux de I’Empire Ottoman(Paris, 1902), III, 509-13.Google Scholar

3 Sumner, B. H., Russia and the Balkans, 1870–1880 (Oxford, 1937), p. 412.Google Scholar

4 Stojanovic, M. D., The Great Powers and the Balkans, 1875–1878 (Cambridge, England, 1939), p. 233.Google Scholar

5 Cf. Federal Writers’ Project of the Works Progress Administration of Massachusetts, The Albanian Struggle in the Old World and New (Boston, The Writer, Inc., 1939), p. 35.Google Scholar

6 Text in Dosti, H., “Historija e rezistencës dhe e rilindjes kombëtare shqiptare” (History of the Albanian National Resistance and Revival), in Shqiperia (Albania), organ of the National Committee “Free Albania” (New York), November 28, 1951, p. 6.Google Scholar

7 Mousset, A., L'Albanie devant I'Europe (1912–1929) (Paris, 1930), p. 7;Google Scholar Federal Writers’ Project, op. cit., p. 35.Google Scholar

8 Cf. Sumner, B. H., op. cit., pp. 586, 588, 601.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., p. 510.

10 Ippen, Th., “Beiträge zur inneren Geschichte Albaniens im XIX. Jahrhundert,” in von Thallόczy, L., ed., Illyrisch-Albanische Forschungen (Munich and Leipzig, 1916), I, 370.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., pp. 370-71. Of these districts, Janina, Filat, Margariti, Ajdonat, Parga, Preveza, and Arta are now incorporated in the Greek state.

12 Cf. Selenica, T., Shqipëria më 1921 (Albania in 1927) (Tirana, 1928), p. 14 Google Scholar; Ippen, , op. cit., p. 371.Google Scholar

13 Cf. article 28 of the Berlin Treaty.

14 Dako, C. A., Albania, the Master Key to the Near East (Boston, 1919), pp. 6667.Google Scholar

15 The Memoirs of Francesco Crispi, Thomas Palamenghi-Crispi, ed. (New York and London, 1912), II, 64, 7374, and III, 279–81Google Scholar; Salvemini, G., La politica estera di Francesco Crispi (Rome, 1919), pp. 13, 20-21.Google Scholar

16 Sumner, B. H., op. cit., p. 509Google Scholar; Salvatorelli, L., La triplice alleanza, storia diplomatica 1877–1912 (Milan, 1939), pp. 3940.Google Scholar

17 Cf. ibid., pp. 52-53; Sumner, B. H., op. cit., p. 529.Google Scholar

18 Cf. Protocole relatif à la démarcation des frontières Turco-Monténégrines et Memorandum annexe, April 18, 1880, in Noradounghian, op. cit., IV, 260–62.

19 Ippen, , op. cit., p. 374.Google Scholar

20 Selenica, Cr., op. cit., p. 15.Google Scholar

21 Vice-Admiral Sir B. Seymour to the Secretary to the Admiralty, September 25, 1880, and September 27, 1880, in Accounts and Papers, 1881 (presented to both Houses of Parliament), Vol. 100, Turkey No. 2 (1881), Inclosure 1 in No. 129, and Inclosure 2 in No. 124.

22 Goschen to Granville, September 27, 1880, in ibid., No. 125.

23 Pluncket to Granville, October 6, 1880, in ibid., No. 222.

24 Granville to Her Majesty's Embassies at St. Petersburg, Paris, Rome, Vienna, and Berlin, October 4, 1880, in ibid., No. 182. There follow several letters as to the reactions of the various governments to the British proposal.

25 Article 7 of Acte de cession du district de Dulcigno au Monténégro, November 25, 1880, in Noradounghian, op. cit., IV, 282.Google Scholar

26 Driault, E. and Lhéritier, M., Histoire diplomatique de la Grece (Paris, 1925), III, 492–93, 501–2Google Scholar; Sumner, B. H., op. cit., p. 550.Google Scholar

27 Driault and Lhéritier, op. cit., pp. 496–98.Google ScholarPubMed

28 Protocol No. 3, Session June 19, 1878, of the Congress of Berlin, in Noradounghian, op. cit., IV, 17 Google Scholar; Driault and Lheritier, op. cit., p. 498.Google ScholarPubMed

29 Protocol No. 13, Session July 5, 1878, of the Congress of Berlin, in Noradounghian, op. cit., IV, 117 Google Scholar; Driault and Lhéritier, op. cit., pp. 504–5.Google Scholar

30 Cf. Selenica, op. cit., p. 15; Galanti, A., VAlbania (Rome, 1901), pp. 230–31.Google Scholar

31 Ippen, , op. cit., p. 371 Google Scholar; Lascaris, S. Th., La politique extérieure de la Grèce, avant et apres le Congrès de Berlin (1875–1881) (Paris, 1924), pp. 156–57Google Scholar.

32 Lascaris, Cf., op. cit., pp. 157–59Google Scholar; Selenica, , op. cit., p. 16 Google Scholar; Driault and Lhéritier, op. cit., IV, 22.Google Scholar

33 Cf. Article 1 of Convention relative à la rectification des frontières Turco-Grecques, May 24, 1881, in Noradounghian, op. cit., IV, 292–93.Google Scholar

34 Ippen, , op. cit., pp. 371–72.Google Scholar

35 Effendi, Wassa, La Vérité sur VAlbanie et les Albanais (Paris, 1879), pp. 9495.Google Scholar

36 Dako, , op. cit., p. 48.Google Scholar

37 For the points of the program Selenica, cf., op. cit., p. 13 Google Scholar, and Ippen, , op. cit., p. 372.Google Scholar

38 Knight, E. F., Albania: a ‘Narrative of Recent Travel (London, 1880), pp. 258–59.Google Scholar

39 Effendi, , op. cit., p. 98.Google Scholar

40 Ippen, , op. cit., pp. 376–77.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., pp. 377–78.

42 Goschen to Granville, July 26, 1880, in Accounts and Papers, 1880, Vol. 81, Turkey No. 15 (1880), No. 81.

43 The Commission was created by the Treaty of Berlin (Articles 18 and 23) in order “to elaborate, in agreement with the Ottoman Porte, the organization of Eastern Roumelia,” as a province endowed with administrative autonomy.

44 Fitzmaurice to Granville, June 21, 1880, in Accounts and Papers, 1880, Vol. 81, Turkey No. 15 (1880), No. 33.

45 Goschen to Granville, July 16, 1880, in ibid., No. 81.

46 Fitzmaurice to Granville, August 1, 1880; August 17, 1880; and August 24, 1880, in ibid., No. 71, No. 109, No. 134.

47 Ippen, Cf., op. cit., pp. 377–80.Google Scholar

48 Driault and Lhéritier, op. cit., Ill, 452–55, 457-60Google ScholarPubMed; Stojanović, op. cit., p. 280.Google Scholar

49 M. Sirdani, Skanderbegu mbas gojëdâdnash (Scanderbeg According to Tradition) (Shkodër, 1926), p. 131.

50 Ippen, , op. cit., p. 369.Google Scholar 61 It is a customary code attributed to Lek III Dukagjini, who lived in the fifteenth century.

51 It is a customary code attributed to Lek III Dukagjini, who lived in the fifteenth century.

52 Cf. Sht. K. Gjecov, Kanuni i Lekë Dukagjinit (Code of Lekë Dukagjini) (Shkodër, 1933), p. xxix; F. Cordignano, L'Albania a traverso Vopera e gli scritti di un grande missionario italiano il P. Domenico Pasi S. J. (1847-1914) (Rome, 1933), I, 390,448.

53 Ippen, , op. cit., pp. 382–83.Google Scholar

54 Sir H. Drummond Wolff, Fitzmaurice's predecessor to the Eastern Roumelian Commission, considered the administrative reforms of Turkey “a sham French centralization” and the system of Prefects and Sub-Prefects “open to very considerable criticism” even in France. Cf. Drummond to Granville, May 4, 1880, in Accounts and Papers, 1880, Vol. 81, Turkey No. 15 (1880), No. 3.

55 Ippen, , op. cit., p. 385.Google Scholar