Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T21:59:30.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovering the Political Aristotle: A Critical Response to Smith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Ronald J. Terchek  and
David K. Moore
Ronald J. Terchek
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
David K. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thomas Smith presents an Aristotelian view of the common good that resembles much contemporary political theory in that it focuses on ethics rather than politics. Smith contends that Aristotle is a potent remedy to a society in crisis due to its unconcern about the common good. Against Smith's apolitical reading of Aristotle, we examine how Aristotle's views of common advantage, the multiple needs of citizens, and political friendship support neither harmonizing conceptions of the good nor a personal “radical conversion” that makes the common good our primary political concern. In engaging the political Aristotle, we find instead that he is concerned with the necessary conflict that resists attempts to arrive at the common advantage, with the material basis of good citizenship, and with the institutions and practices that foster a good deliberative politics.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 94 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 905 - 911
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, Bruce, and Alstott, Anne. 1999. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984a. History of Animals, trans. Thompson, d'A. W.. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, Pp. 774–993.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984b. Politics, trans. Lord, Carnes. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1985. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1990. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1991. On Rhetoric, trans. Kennedy, George A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1992. Athenian Constitution, Eudemian Ethics, Virtues and Vices, trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Colman, John. 1983. John Locke's Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, John. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Jill. 1998. “Democracy and Distribution: Aristotle on Just Desert.” Political Theory 26 (12): 784–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. 1989. Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1823. Reasonableness of Christianity. London: Tegg.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1968. Some Thoughts Concerning Education. In The Educational Writing of John Locke, ed. Axell, James L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 111–325.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1990. “Aristotelian Social Democracy.” In Liberalism and the Good, ed. Douglas, R. Bruce, Mara, Gerald, and Richardson, Henry S.. New York: Routledge. Pp. 203–52.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. 1985. Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1974. J. S. Mill. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Salkever, Stephen. 1990. Finding the Mean. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Semmel, Bernard. 1984. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Thomas W. 1999. “Aristotle on the Conditions for and Limits of the Common Good.” American Political Science Review 93 (09): 625–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terchek, Ronald J. 1997. Republican Paradoxes and Liberal Anxieties. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. 1993. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.