Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-fqvcn Total loading time: 0.449 Render date: 2021-04-17T18:39:20.040Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Edward D. Mansfield
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Helen V. Milner
Affiliation:
Columbia University
B. Peter Rosendorff
Affiliation:
Georgetown University and University of Southern California

Abstract

Relatively little research has focused on whether countries' political institutions affect their international trade relations. We address this issue by analyzing the relationship between regime type and trade policy. In a formal model of commercial policy, we establish that the ratification responsibility of the legislature in democratic states leads pairs of democracies to set trade barriers at a lower level than mixed country-pairs (composed of an autocracy and a democracy). We test this hypothesis by analyzing the effects of regime type on trade during the period from 1960 to 1990. The results of this analysis accord with our argument: Democratic pairs have had much more open trade relations than mixed pairs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, José Antonio, Limongi, Fernando, and Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Classifying Political Regimes.” Studies in Comparative International Development 31 (Summer): 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, James E. 1979. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” American Economic Review 69 (03): 106–16.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Banks, Arthur. 1995. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Binghampton, NY: Center for Social Analysis, SUNY-Binghampton.Google Scholar
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1985. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (08): 474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1989. “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade.” Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (02): 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bliss, Harry, and Russett, Bruce. 1998. “Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962–1989.” Journal of Politics 60 (11): 1126–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Melo, Jaime, and Panagariya, Arvind, eds. 1993. New Dimensions in Regional Integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, Alan V. 1998. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, ed. Frankel, Jeffrey A.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 722.Google Scholar
Defense Mapping Agency. 1985. Distance Between Ports. 5th ed. Washington, DC: Defense Mapping Agency.Google Scholar
Dixon, William, and Moon, Bruce. 1993. “Political Similarity and American Foreign Trade Patterns.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (03): 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics.” American Political Science Review 80 (12): 1151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, and Irwin, Douglas A.. 1995. “Trade Blocs, Currency Blocs and the Reorientation of Trade in the 1930s.” Journal of International Economics 38 (02): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ethier, Wilfred J. 1998. “Unilateralism in a Multilateral World.” University of Pennsylvania. Mimeograph.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S., and Gowa, Joanne. 1995. “Polities and Peace.” International Security 20 (Fall): 123–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C., Markusen, James, and Rose, Andrew. 1998. “Understanding the Home Market Effect and the Gravity Equation.” Working Paper no. 6804. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Gary L., and Modlin, Marilyn J.. 1986. Direct-Line Distances. International ed. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A. 1993. “Is Japan Creating a Yen Bloc in East Asia and the Pacific?” In Regionalism and Rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia, ed. Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Kahler, Miles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 5387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey, Stein, Ernesto, and Wei, Shang-jin. 1995. “Trading Blocs and the Americas: The Natural, the Unnatural, and the Super-Natural.” Journal of Development Economics 47 (06): 6195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark. 1996. “An Overview of the Political Regime Change Dataset.” Comparative Political Studies 29 (08): 469–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1994. Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1990. Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 1994. “Protection for Sale.” American Economic Review 84 (09): 833–50.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert, Jaggers, Keith, and Moore, Will H.. 1989. Polity II: Political Structures and Regime Change, 1800–1986. ICPSR Code-book (Study #9263). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Webb, Steven B., eds. 1994. Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrigan, Keith. 1993. “OECD Imports and Trade Barriers in 1983.” Journal of International Economics 35 (08): 91111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartland-Thunberg, Penelope. 1980. Trading Blocs, U.S. Exports, and World Trade. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, and Krugman, Paul. 1985. Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hillman, Arye L. 1982. “Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist Motives.” American Economic Review 72 (12): 1180–90.Google Scholar
Hillman, Arye L., Van Long, Ngo, and Moser, Peter. 1995. “Modeling Reciprocal Trade Liberalization: The Political-Economy and National-Welfare Perspectives.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 131 (09): 503–15.Google Scholar
Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 1995. “Tracking Democracy's Third Wave with the Polity III Data.” Journal of Peace Research 32 (11): 469–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiman, Ephraim. 1976. “Trade and the Decline of Colonialism.” Economic Journal 86 (09): 459–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornai, Janos. 1992. The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 1997. “What Should Trade Negotiators Negotiate About?Journal of Economic Literature 35 (03): 113–20.Google Scholar
Kurian, George Thomas. 1992. Encyclopedia of the Third World. 4th ed. Vols. 1–3. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
Leamer, Edward. 1988. “Cross-Section Estimation of the Effects of Trade Barriers.” In Empirical Methods for International Trade, ed. Feenstra, Robert C.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 5182.Google Scholar
Linnemann, Hans. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. “Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Theory and Evidence.” International Organization 48 (Autumn): 595632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 1995. Monitoring the World Economy, 1820–1992. Paris: Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Bronson, Rachel. 1997. “Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 91 (03): 94107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Busch, Marc L.. 1995. “The Political Economy of Nontariff Barriers: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Organization 49 (Autumn): 723–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1998. “Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Snyder, Jack. 1995. “Democratization and the Danger of War.” International Security 20 (Summer): 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1996. “Trade Negotiations, Information and Domestic Politics: The Role of Domestic Groups.” Economics and Politics 8 (07): 145–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1997. “Democracy and International Trade Negotiations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (02): 117–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Taberes, Tressa E.. 1998. “The Political Determinants of International Trade: The Major Powers, 1907–1990.” American Political Science Review 92 (09): 649–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, John F. 1950. “The Bargaining Problem.” Econometrica 18 (04): 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1994. Politics, Process, and American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce M.. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (06): 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pahre, Robert. 1997. “Endogenous Domestic Institutions in Two Level Games.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (02): 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polachek, Solomon William. 1980. “Conflict and Trade.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (03): 5578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollins, Brian M. 1989. “Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce: The Effects of International Political Interactions on Bilateral Trade Flows.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (08): 737–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomfret, Richard. 1988. Unequal Trade: The Economics of Discriminatory International Trade Policies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1994. “The Rush to Free Trade in the Developing World. Why So Late? Why Now? Will It Last?” In Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization, and Economic Adjustment, ed. Haggard, Stephan and Webb, Steven B.. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 6188.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1995. “The Political Economy of Trade Policy.” In Handbook of International Economics, ed. Grossman, Gene M. and Rogoff, Kenneth. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV. Vol. III. Pp. 1457–94.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald. 1987. “Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions.” International Organization 41 (Spring): 203–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorff, B. Peter. 1996. “Endogenous Trade Restrictions and Domestic Political Pressure.” In The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Essays in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, ed. Feenstra, Robert C., Grossman, Gene M., and Irwin, Douglas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. 245–64.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, and Small, Melvin. 1994. Correlates of War Project: International and Civil War Data, 1816–1992 [computer file] (Study #9905). Ann Arbor, MI: J. David Singer and Melvin Small [producers], 1993. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1994.Google Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M., and Emmons, Juliann. 1991. “Birds of a Feather: Democratic Political Systems and Alliance Choices in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (06): 285306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1969. “Formal Alliances, 1816–1965: An Extension of the Basic Data.” Journal of Peace Research 6 (3): 257–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staar, Richard F., et al., eds. 1991. Yearbook on International Communist Affairs. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Summers, Robert, and Heston, Alan. 1991. “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (05): 327–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Times Atlas of the World. 1992. 9th ed. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Times Concise Atlas of the World. 1972. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Trefler, Daniel. 1993. “Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (02): 138–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (05): 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. 1995. Regionalism and the World Trading System. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 163 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *