Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:54:37.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Williams v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Monroe Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 624 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Defendant counterclaimed that plaintiff misappropriated defendant’s trade secrets. See Williams v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 681 F.2d 161 (3d Cir. 1982). See also Williams v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 691 F.2d 168 (3d Cir. 1982).

2 694 F.2d 300, 304–05.

3 595 F.2d 1287 (3d Cir. 1979).

4 694 F.2d at 303 (quoting id. at 1294) (emphasis added).

5 694 F.2d at 303 (quoting 595 F.2d at 1294).

6 694 F.2d at 303 (citing Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423 (1964)).

7 The court did not rule out the possibility, however, that significant developments could occur as the case proceeded that might require the district court to reconsider the application of the act of state doctrine. 694 F.2d at 305.

8 See Industrial Inv. Dev. Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 594 F.2d 48, 54–55 (5th Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 445 U.S. 903 (1980); Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, 549 F.2d 597, 605 (9th Cir. 1976).

9 550 F.2d 68, 76 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 984 (1977).

10 See, e.g., Industrial Inv. Dev. Corp. v. Mitsui & Co., 594 F.2d at 54–55.

11 See H.R. Rep. No. 1487, 94th Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1976 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 6604, 6615.

12 Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas, Nos. 80–5165, 81–5172 (9th Cir. Feb. 28, 1983), rev’g, Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 498 F.Supp. 1112, 1121 (CD. Cal. 1980), summarized in 75 AJIL 370 (1981). See also General Aircraft Corp. v. Air America, 482 F. Supp. 3, 6–7 (D.D.C. 1979).