Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:14:16.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S. Rejection of Protocol to Biological Weapons Convention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , October 2001 , pp. 899 - 901
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Opened for signature Apr. 10, 1972, 26 UST 583, 1015 UNTS 163.

2 See S.C. Res. 687, para. 7 (Apr. 3, 1991) (inviting Iraq to ratify the Convention).

3 See Special Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, Final Report, Doc. BWC/SPCCONF/1 (1994). Several of the documents associated with the drafting of the protocol to the Convention are obtainable from <www.brad.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/btwc/docs.htm>.

4 See Fourth Review Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, Final Document, Pt. II, Art. XII(2), Doc. BWC/CONF.IV/9 (1996).

5 See Procedural Report of the Ad Hoc Group of States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction, Docs. BWC/AD HOC GROUP/56-1 & 56-2 (2001). The first of the two documents contains the procedural report, as well as the ad hoc group’s “rolling text” (Annex A). The second document includes the chairman’s composite text as Annex B.

6 Donald, A. Mahley, Special Negotiator for Chemical and Biological Arms Control Issues, Statement to the Ad Hoc Group of Biological Weapons Convention States Parties (July 25, 2001)Google Scholar, at <http://www.state.gov>; see Vernon, Loeb, U.S. Won’t Back Plan to Enforce Germ Pact, Wash. Post, July 21, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar.

7 See U.S. Dep’t of State Daily Press Briefing, Phillip, T. Reeker, Deputy Spokesman (July 25, 2001)Google Scholar, at <http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2001/>; Glenda, Cooper, U.S. Rejects Biological Arms Ban Protocol, Wash. Post, July 26, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar.

8 See Judith, Miller, U.S. Explores Other Options on Preventing Germ Warfare, N.Y. Times, July 25, 2001, at A4 Google Scholar.