Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:03:49.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Revenue Rule” Barring of Foreign Suits Concerning Cigarettes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , July 2002 , pp. 715 - 717
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Other suits have concerned alleged conspiracies by tobacco companies to misrepresent the health effects of tobacco products. See Sean, D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 94 AJIL 543 (2000)Google Scholar.

2 Attorney General of Canada v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, 268 F.3d 103, 109-13 (2d Cir. 2001) (footnotes omitted). For subsequent district court decisions in similar cases reaching the same result, see Ecuador v. Philip Morris Cos., 188 F.Supp.2d 1359 (S.D. Fla. 2002), and European Community v. Japan Tobacco, 186 F.Supp.2d 231 (E.D.N.Y. 2002).