Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T19:09:43.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Religion and International Law. Edited by Mark W. Janis and Carolyn Evans. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999. Pp. xviii, 513. Fl 295.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Harold J. Berman*
Affiliation:
Emory Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Influence of Religion on the Development of International Law (Mark W. Janis ed., 1991).

2 Charles L., Kent, Book Review, 86 AJTL 406, 408 (1992)Google Scholar.

3 The Influence of Religion on the Development of International Law, supra note 1, at xii.

4 Only one of the chapters, that of William Park (“Spiritual Energy and Secular Power”), deals with the lex mercatoria, the body of transnational law governing commercial transactions—a true jus gentium in the classical sense.

5 See Muldoon, James, Popes, Lawyers, and Infidels: The Church and the Non-Christian World, 1250–1550, at 3104 (1979)Google Scholar.

6 See Muldoon, James, The Contribution of the Medieval Canon Lawyers to the Formation of International Law, 28 Traditio 483 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 In his discussion of Islamic international law, Gamal Badr gives the striking example of the elaborate 1292 treaty of friendship and military alliance between the sultan of Egypt and Syria, on one side, and the king of Aragon on his own behalf and on behalf of the rulers of Castile and Leon and of Portugal, on the other (pp. 96–97).

8 Parliament of the World’s Religions, Towards a Global Ethic (An Initial Declaration) (1993), <http://www.cpwr.org/calldocs/EthicTOC.html>.

9 Id. at 3 (emphasis omitted).