Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:25:41.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Qualified Neutrality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Extract

It is interesting to know that a hundred years before the well-known attempt of Great Britain to stop corn on its way to the French, on the ground ridiculed by Woolsey, that the republic had incorporated its whole laboring class in its army, a similar attempt was made under Queen Anne, though not on the same ground, but rather as an appeal ad misericordiam. Henry Boyle, Secretary of State, wrote on April 12,1709, to Daniel Pulteney, then British Minister in Denmark (see Record Office, Foreign Entry Book, 4) as follows.

Type
Current Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Quoted in extenso in British Diplomatic Instructions (1688-1789), id. Ill(Ed. J. F. Chance for the Royal Historical Society).

2 In a note of Feb. 21, 1690-1, it was promised that the ships already detained “that cannot be detained but in pursuance to our convention for preventing trade with France shall be restored or a just and faire compensation paid for them.“

3 See Prof. Jessup's editorial comment “The birth, death, and reincarnation of neutrality” in this journal, Vol. 26 (1932), pp. 789-793.