Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:44:49.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problemi di riforma del diritto internazionale privato italiano. Published under the auspices of the Italian National Council of Notaries. Milan: Dott. A. Giuffrè, 1986. Pp xii, 1041. L. 70.000.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Louis F. del Duca*
Affiliation:
The Dickinson School of Law

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This convegno was in some respects comparable to meetings of the American Law Institute, with its critical evaluation of the proposed text and subsequent presentation of an amended draft by Vitta in response to the commentary.

2 The duties of a notary in Italy and other civil law countries are entirely different from and far more extensive than those of a notary in the United States, who generally only verifies acknowledgments. The civil law notary draws up legal instruments in property, family, corporate and other areas of the law. In addition, many transactions must be incorporated in notarial deeds in order to be valid. Notaries and lawyers have separate professional organizations in civil law countries. The notaries' professional organizations are frequently involved in law reform activities and are generally extremely influential in public affairs. See P. Herzog, Civil Procedure in France 102–09 (1967); Margadant, The Mexican Notariate, 6 Cal. W. L. Rev. 218 (1970); M. Cappelletti & J. Perillo, Civil Procedure in Italy 65–67 (1965).

3 Formal papers were presented by Edoardo Vitta (Florence), Andrea Giardina (Rome), Alessandro Migliazza (Milan), Francois Rigaux (Louvain), Riccardo Luzzatto (Milan), Franco Mosconi (Pavia), Tito Ballarino (Padua), Alfred A. von Overbeck (Freiburg) and Kurt Siehr (Zurich).

4 “Interventions” were presented by Fritz Schwind (Vienna), Giuseppe Barile (Rome), Vicente L. Simó Santonja (Valencia), Gerardo Broggini (Milan), Paolo Picone (Naples), Giuseppe Sperduti (Rome), Antonio Ruini (Modena), Giorgio Gaja (Florence), Giorgio Badiali (Perugia), Stefania Bariatti (Milan), Fausto Pocar (Milan), Massimo Panebianco (Salerno) and Francesco Capotorti (Rome).

5 These articles deal with the Law of Inheritance and Gifts—Articles 26–32, Property Law—Articles 33–37, Contractual Obligations—Articles 38–48, and Extracontractual Obligations—Articles 49–57.

The current preliminary provisions to the Italian Civil Code contain only one article, dealing with conflict-of-laws rules for “Obligations” (i.e., contracts and torts). This section provides a generic confiict-of-laws rule for contracts in general and another for torts in general (see Art. 25).

Recognition of the increasing complexity of the law is illustrated by the fact that the proposed revision utilizes 19 articles (i.e., 38–57) to deal with conflict-of-laws rules for contracts and torts. For example, separate sections deal with contracts involving real estate, personal property, secured loans, intangibles, insurance, banking, services, independent contractors, labor, consumers, agency, commercial paper and related general rules of interpretation. The torts sections address matters such as conflict-of-laws rules for tort liability in general, product liability, and unfair competition.