Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T23:37:37.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Local Enemy Assets and the Paris Agreement on Reparation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Kurt H. Nadelmann*
Affiliation:
Comparative Law, University of Pennsylvania.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Text in Department of State Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 343 (Jan. 27, 1946), p. 114; below, Supplement, p. 117.

2 Agreement, Part I, Art. 6 A.

3 Same.

4 See Feilchenfeld, , Elrick, , and Judd, , “Priority Problems in Publie Debt Settlements,” in Columbia Law Review, Vol. 30 (1930), p. 1115, at p. 1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Restatement, Conflict of Laws (1934), Sec. 265; Bustamante Code of Private International Law, Secs. 135, 420. See Nadelmann, , “Bankruptcy Treaties,” in University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 93 (1944), p. 58, at p. 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Glenn on Liquidation (1935), p. 670.

7 English Bankruptcy Act, 1914, Sec. 30.

8 U. S. Bankruptcy Act of 1898, as amended, Secs. 63 (a) (6) and (7), 52 Stat. 873 (1938), 11 U.S.C.A. Sec. 103 (Supp. 1945). Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th ed., 1941, Vol. III, Sec. 63.25.

9 So Glenn, at p. 672.

10 Batthyany v. Walford, 36 Ch. D. 269 (1887); Woodward, Quasi Contracts (1913), p. 4; Planiol et Ripert, Droit Civil Français, Vol. VII, Secs. 752, 767; Gutteridge, and David, , “The Doctrine of Unjustified Enrichment”, in Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. V (1934), p. 204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gutteridge, and Lipstein, , “Conflicts of Law in Matters of Unjustifiable Enrichment”, in Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. VII (1939), p. 80 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 For the French text, see, Canada Treaty Series, 1945, No. 23.

12 Judgment No. 2 in the Case of the Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, P.C.I.J., Ser. A, No. 2, p. 19 (1924). See Hyde, , International Law, Boston, 1945 (2d. ed.), Vol. II, p. 1493 Google Scholar.

13 Agreement, Part I, Art. 6 F.

14 Part I, Art. 6 B.

15 Part II, Art. 5.

16 Part II, Art, 6.

17 Rabel, , “Situs Problems in Enemy Property Measures”, in Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 11 (1945), p. 118, at p. 132Google Scholar; also In re Wiskemann, 92 L. J. Ch. 349 (1923).

18 Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, No. 9 (a), 40 Stat. 411 (1917), 50 U.S.C.A., App. No. 9.

19 New Section 34 (a) of the Act, added by An Act to Amend the First War Powers Act, 1941, Public Law No. 671, 79th Congress, 2d session (August 8, 1946). Drafted before the adoption, at the Paris Conference, of the Resolution on “Equal Treatment”. First introduced, as H. R. 5089, Dec. 20,1945, Congressional Record, 79th Congress, First Session, Vol. 91, No. 227, p. 12668.

20 Unanimous Resolution No. 3, Department of State Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 343 (Jan. 27, 1946), p. 122.

21 Sen. Rep. No. 1839, 79th Congress, 2d Session (1946), p. 4.

22 Bankruptcy Law No. 11.719 of 1933, No. 7.

23 See Nadelmann, , “Legal Treatment of Foreign and Domestic Creditors,” in Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 11 (1946), p. 696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; same, “Once Again: Local Priorities in Bankruptcy”, in this Journal, Vol. 38 (1944), p. 470.