Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:23:36.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. By Charles N. Brower and Jason D. Brueschke. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1998. Pp. xx, 911. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

David J. Bederman
David J. Bederman*
Affiliation:
Emory University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , April 1999 , pp. 538 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal 1981–1983 (Richard B. Lillich ed., 1984); John A. Westberg, International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties: Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (1991); Aida B. Avanessian, Iran-United States Claims Tribunal in Action (1993); Wayne Mapp, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: The First Ten Years, 1981–1991 (1993); George H. Aldrich, The Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (1996); The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility (Richard B. Lillich & Daniel Barstow Magraw eds., 1998).

2 Richard B. Lillich, Remarks, 76 ASIL Proc. 5, 5–6 (1982).

3 Decision No. 32-A18-FT, 5 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 251 (1984 I). The A/18 caveat allows the Tribunal to decide that a dominant and effective national of the United States nonetheless abused that status in acquiring rights or property in Iran. The Tribunal’s caveat cases have thus focused on substantive aspects of national laws that restrict ownership of property to citizens. See, e.g., Saghi and Islamic Republic of Iran, AWD 544-298-2 (Jan. 22, 1993), summarized in 87 AJIL 447 (1993).

4 Partial Award, AWD 310-56-3, 15 Iran-U.S. CI. Trib. Rep. 189 (1987 II).

5 AWD 560-44/46/47-3 (Oct. 12, 1994).