Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T05:12:54.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom of Religion or Belief. Ensuring Effective International Legal Protection. (International Studies in Human Rights, Vol. 44.) By Bahiyyih G. Tahzib. The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1996. Pp. xxxii, 594. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

T. Jeremy Gunn
T. Jeremy Gunn*
Affiliation:
District of Columbia Bar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 90 , Issue 4 , October 1996 , pp. 707 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Article 18 provides, in pertinent part:

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.

3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, healdi, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

2 In the footnote in which she comes closest to asserting that international standards have had an actual impact on domestic law, Tahzib states that the standards have been applied by domestic courts (p. 79 n.58). Yet her evidence to support this assertion consists of citing not actual cases, but secondary sources—the most recent of which is almost 30 years old.