No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Braka v. Bancomer, S.N.C. 762 F.2d. 222
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985
References
1 Bancomer’s New York agency was not authorized to accept deposits, but transmitted the funds to the Mexican office.
2 757 F.2d 516 (2d Cir. 1985), summarized in 79 AJIL 733 (1985).
3 762 F.2d 222, 224 (quoting Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S.A. v. Standard Cigar Co., 392 F.2d 706, 715–16 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 924 (1968)).
4 735 F.2d 645 (2d Cir. 1984), summarized in 79 AJIL 454 (1985).
5 See Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 696–706 (1976) (Opinion of White, J.).
6 See Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300, 316 n.38 (2d Cir. 1981), summarized in 75 AJIL 968 (1981), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1148 (1982); Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 550 F.2d 68, 72-73 (2d Cir.), summarized in 71 AJIL 781 (1977), cert, denied, 434 U.S. 984(1977).