Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:27:54.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bergesen v. Joseph Muller Corporation. 710 F.2d 928

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 219 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 June 10, 1958, 21 UST 2517, TIAS No. 6997, 330 UNTS 38.

2 548 F. Supp. 650, 651 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), summarized in 77 AJIL 308 (1983).

3 This issue had been previously posed but left unresolved in the Second Circuit. See, e.g., Andros Compania Maritima, S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., 579 F.2d 691, 699 n. 11 (2d Cir. 1978).

4 See Haight, G., Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958)Google Scholar; Contini, , International Commercial Arbitration, 8 Am. J. Comp. L. 283 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 710 F.2d 928, 932.

6 Id.

7 See Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 520 n.15 (1974).

8 710 F.2d at 933.

9 See Sumitomo Corp. v. Parakopi Compania Maritima, 477 F. Supp. 737, 740–41 (S.D.N.Y. 1979).

10 710 F.2d at 933.

11 No. P 627/79/ha (Schweizerisches Bundesgericht, June 19, 1980).