Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T04:05:33.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attempts to Transmute Indemnity into Discharge of Claims in Executive Agreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2017

Michael H. Cardozo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , October 1955 , pp. 560 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 127 F. Supp. 601 (Ct. CL. 1955); digested in 49 A.J.I.L. 410 (1955).

2 “Executive Agreements and Emanations from the Fifth Amendment,” 49 A.J.I.L. 362 (1955).Google Scholar

3 “The Flag, The Constitution, and International Agreements,” 68 Harv. L. Rev. 1374 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 61 Stat. (4) 4168, T.I.A.S. No. 1920; 67 U. N. Treaty Series 89, No. I: 868.

5 Memorandum of Understanding of August 14, 1947, 61 Stat. (4) 3962, T.I.A.S. No. 1757, Par. 6 (a); 42 A.J.I.L. Supp. 146 (1948).

6 62 Stat. (3) 2658, T.I.A.S. No. 1803.

7 61 Stat. (2) 1245, T.I.A.S. No. 1648. See also Convention between the United States and Norway respecting the claims of Hannevig against the United States and Jones against Norway, 62 Stat. (2) 1798 (1948), T.I.A.S. No. 1865; Hannevig v. U. S., 84 F. Supp. 743 (Ct. Cl. 1949).

8 60 Stat. (2) 1753, T.I.A.S. No. 1532.

9 61 Stat. (4) 4175, T.I.A.S. No. 1928 (1946).

10 62 Stat. (3) 3984, T.I.A.S. No. 2064 (1946).

11 61 Stat. (4) 3924; T.I.A.S. No. 1750 (1947).

12 The texts are collected in various Reports to Congress on Lend-Lease Operations, from No. 23 through No. 28.

13 Etlimar Societe Anonyme v. U. S., 106 F. Supp. 191 (Ct. Cl. 1952).

14 U. S. v. Guy W. Capps, Inc., 348 U. S. 296 (1955), affirming 204 F. 2d 655 (4th Cir. 1953) ; digested in 48 A.J.I.L. 153 (1954) and 49 A.J.I.L. 407 (1955).

15 See, e.g., Borchard, “Extraterritorial Confiscations,” 36 A.J.I.L. 275 (1942)Google Scholar; Jessup, “The Litvinoff Assignment and the Pink Case,” ibid. 282 (1942)Google Scholar; Borchard, “Treaties and Executive Agreements: A Reply,” 54 Yale L.J. 616 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 68 Harv. L. Rev. 1374 (1955).

17 See, e.g., McDougal and Lans, “Treaties and Congressional-Executive Agreements: Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy,” 54 Yale L.J. 181, 534 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.