No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Attempts to Transmute Indemnity into Discharge of Claims in Executive Agreements
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000170356/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000170356a.jpg)
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1955
References
1 127 F. Supp. 601 (Ct. CL. 1955); digested in 49 A.J.I.L. 410 (1955).
2 “Executive Agreements and Emanations from the Fifth Amendment,” 49 A.J.I.L. 362 (1955).Google Scholar
3 “The Flag, The Constitution, and International Agreements,” 68 Harv. L. Rev. 1374 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 61 Stat. (4) 4168, T.I.A.S. No. 1920; 67 U. N. Treaty Series 89, No. I: 868.
5 Memorandum of Understanding of August 14, 1947, 61 Stat. (4) 3962, T.I.A.S. No. 1757, Par. 6 (a); 42 A.J.I.L. Supp. 146 (1948).
6 62 Stat. (3) 2658, T.I.A.S. No. 1803.
7 61 Stat. (2) 1245, T.I.A.S. No. 1648. See also Convention between the United States and Norway respecting the claims of Hannevig against the United States and Jones against Norway, 62 Stat. (2) 1798 (1948), T.I.A.S. No. 1865; Hannevig v. U. S., 84 F. Supp. 743 (Ct. Cl. 1949).
8 60 Stat. (2) 1753, T.I.A.S. No. 1532.
9 61 Stat. (4) 4175, T.I.A.S. No. 1928 (1946).
10 62 Stat. (3) 3984, T.I.A.S. No. 2064 (1946).
11 61 Stat. (4) 3924; T.I.A.S. No. 1750 (1947).
12 The texts are collected in various Reports to Congress on Lend-Lease Operations, from No. 23 through No. 28.
13 Etlimar Societe Anonyme v. U. S., 106 F. Supp. 191 (Ct. Cl. 1952).
14 U. S. v. Guy W. Capps, Inc., 348 U. S. 296 (1955), affirming 204 F. 2d 655 (4th Cir. 1953) ; digested in 48 A.J.I.L. 153 (1954) and 49 A.J.I.L. 407 (1955).
15 See, e.g., Borchard, “Extraterritorial Confiscations,” 36 A.J.I.L. 275 (1942)Google Scholar; Jessup, “The Litvinoff Assignment and the Pink Case,” ibid. 282 (1942)Google Scholar; Borchard, “Treaties and Executive Agreements: A Reply,” 54 Yale L.J. 616 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
16 68 Harv. L. Rev. 1374 (1955).
17 See, e.g., McDougal and Lans, “Treaties and Congressional-Executive Agreements: Interchangeable Instruments of National Policy,” 54 Yale L.J. 181, 534 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.