Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T13:02:36.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The American Withdrawal from the Opium Conference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Quincy Wright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 1925 , pp. 348 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © by the American Society of International Law 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Text printed infra p. 380.Google ScholarPubMed For account of international discussions leading up to these conferences, see this Journal, vol. 18, pp. 281 et seq. Google ScholarPubMed

2 Salter, Allied Shipping Control, p. 257.Google Scholar

3 Scott, ed., Instructions to American Delegates to the Hague Conferences, 1916, p. 72.Google Scholar Compare statement of Premier Lloyd George, Jan. 21, 1922, printed in International Con-oiliation, Feb., 1922, No. 171, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar

4 See Corwin, President’s Control of Foreign Relations, pp. 40–46;Google Scholar Wright, Control of American Foreign Relations, pp. 278–283.Google Scholar

5 Benton, Abridgment of Debates in Congress, vol. 9, p. 91.Google Scholar

6 Sen. Doc. No. 56, 54th Cong., 2nd sess., p. 47.Google Scholar

7 Richardson, Messages of the Presidents, vol. 7, p. 431.Google Scholar

8 Ibid., vol. 7, p. 520, vol. 8, p. 112.

9 Cong. Rec. 1916, pp. 3700–4.Google Scholar

10 37 U. S. Stat. 913;Google Scholar Poole, The Conduct of Foreign Relations, p. 165.Google Scholar

11 39 U. S. Stat. 618.Google Scholar

12 42 U. S. Stat. 141.Google Scholar See Wright, Limitation of Armament, Institute of International Education, Syllabus, No. 12, p. 22, and Minn. Law Rev., March, 1922, p. 288.Google Scholar

13 38 U. S. Stat. 1184, sec. 16.Google Scholar

14 Act, June 5, 1920, 41 U. S. Stat. 1007, sec. 34.Google Scholar

15 Acts, February 9, 1922, 42 U. S. Stat. 363;Google Scholar February 28, 1923, 42 U. S. Stat. 1325.Google Scholar See this Journal, vol. 17, p. 320.Google Scholar

16 Wright, op. cit, pp. 268–273.Google ScholarPubMed

17 7 Op. 214;Google Scholar Wright, op. cit., p. 324.Google Scholar

18 Wright, op. cit., pp. 248, 281.Google Scholar

19 Garner, Introduction to Political Science, p. 481;Google Scholar Wright, op. cit., pp. 317–320.Google ScholarPubMed

20 Garner, op. cit., pp. 482–488.Google ScholarPubMed

21 Fish, American Diplomacy, pp. 46, 120.Google ScholarPubMed

22 Salter, op. cit., pp. 253 et seq.Google ScholarPubMed

23 Brown, International Realities, pp. 189–191;Google ScholarPubMed Poole, op. cit., Chap. 9.Google ScholarPubMed Bryce, American Commonwealth, Chap. 21, Modern Democracies, Chap. 61;Google Scholar Wright, op. cit., pp. 363–368 Google Scholar

24 Corwin, op. cit., p. 46.Google ScholarPubMed

25 Salter, op. cit., p. 277.Google Scholar

26 Cong. Bee., Nov. 19, 1919, vol. 58, p. 9289;Google Scholar World Peace Foundation pamphlet, vol. 3, No. 4, Aug., 1920, p. 168.Google Scholar

27 Terrace, v. Thompson, 263 U. S. 197.Google Scholar