Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T10:03:41.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Allied Bank International v. Banco Credito Agricola de Cartago. 757 F.2d 516

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , July 1985 , pp. 733 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 566 F.Supp. 1440 (S.D.N.Y. 1983), summarized in 78 AJIL 441 (1984). Following the district court’s dismissal, 38 of the 39 plaintiff banks signed a refinancing agreement. Thus, only one of the original plaintiffs was represented on appeal.

2 No. 83-7714 (2d Cir. Apr. 23, 1984), summarized in 78 AJIL 899 (1984).

3 757 F.2d 516, 519.

4 Id. at 521.

5 Id. (quoting Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S.A. v. Standard Cigar Co., 392 F.2d 706, 715-16 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 924 (1968)).

6 757 F.2d at 521-22.

7 Id. at 522.

8 On Apr. 1, 1985, appellees filed a petition for a rehearing or, in the alternative, a rehearing en banc, in which counsel questioned the court’s reliance on the U.S. amicus brief and the conclusion that the situs of the debt was in the United States.