No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Airline Pilots Association, International v. TACA International Airlines, S.A. 748 F.2d 965
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1985
References
1 Despite its title, the Railway Labor Act also governs airline labor relations.
2 See Ruby v. TACA Int’l Airlines, S.A., 439 F.2d 1359, 1361 (5th Cir. 1971).
3 Civil Aviation Agreement, Apr. 2, 1982, U.S.-E1 Salvador, TIAS No. 10488.
4 El Salvador Const, art. 110, ¶4 (adopted Dec. 20, 1983).
5 748 F.2d 965, 970.
6 Id. at 971.
7 462 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 1060 (1972).
8 392 F.2d 706 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 393 U.S. 924 (1968).
9 748 F.2d at 970-71. See Maltina, 462 F.2d at 1027; Tabacalera, 392 F.2d at 715-16.
10 748 F.2d at 971.
11 Those factors are:
(a) vital national interests of each of the states,
(b) the extent and the nature of the hardship that inconsistent enforcement actions would impose upon the person,
(c) the extent to which the required conduct is to take place in the territory of the other state,
(d) the nationality of the person, and
(e) the extent to which enforcement by action of either state can reasonably be expected to achieve compliance with the rule prescribed by that state.
Id. at 971-72.
12 Id. at 972.
13 Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964).