Article contents
U.S. Rejection of Kyoto Protocol Process
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 June 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0002930000757046/resource/name/firstPage-S0002930000757046a.jpg)
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2001
References
1 Dec. 10, 1997, 37 ILM 22 (1998); see Breidenich, Clare, Magraw, Daniel, Rowley, Anne, & Rubin, James W., The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 92 AJIL 315 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 May 9, 1992, 31 ILM 849 (1992).
3 See [UN Framework Convention on Climate Change] Kyoto Protocol: Status of Ratification, at <http://www.unfccc.de/resource/kpstats.pdf> (visited July 20, 2001).
4 See Drozdiak, William, Global Warming Talks Collapse, Wash. Post, Nov. 26, 2000, at A1.Google Scholar
5 Id.; Revkin, Andrew C., Treaty Talks Fail to Find Consensus in Global Warming, N.Y. Times, Nov. 26, 2000, §1, at 1 Google Scholar.
6 U.S. Dep’t of State Press Release on Frank E. Loy, Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs and Head of the U.S. Delegation, Statement to the Sixth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 6) (Nov. 25, 2000), at <http://www.state.gov/www/policy_remarks/2000/001125Joy_cop6.html>.
7 See Report of the Conference of the Parties on the First Part of Its Sixth Session, paras. 116, 122, UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2000Add.1 (2001).
8 Bush Campaign Press Release on “A Comprehensive National Energy Policy” (Sept. 29, 2000) (on file at GWU).
9 See Jehl, Douglas & Revkin, Andrew C., Bush, in Reversal, Won’t Seek Cut in Emissions of Carbon Dioxide, N.Y. Times, Mar. 14, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar.
10 See Goldstein, Amy & Pianin, Eric Revkin, Andrew C., Hill Pressure Fueled Bush’s Emissions Shift, Wash. Post, Mar. 15, 2001, at A1.Google Scholar
11 See Pianin, Eric, Whitman Has Some Industries Worried, Wash. Post, Mar. 2, 2001, at A13 Google Scholar; Pianin, Eric & Goldstein, Amy, Bush Drops a Call for Emissions Cuts, Wash. Post, Mar. 14, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar. In May 2001, the White House requested a scientific study from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) on whether global warming was a serious problem. On June 6, an NAS panel reaffirmed the mainstream scientific view that the global atmosphere was warming due to human activity. See Seelye, Katharine Q., Panel Tells Bush Global Warming Is Getting Worse, N.Y. Times, June 7, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar. Nevertheless, President Bush maintained his opposition to the Kyoto Protocol. See Sanger, David E., Bush Will Continue to Oppose Kyoto Pact on Global Warming, N.Y. Times, June 12, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar.
12 See Pianin, Eric, U.S. Aims to Pull Out of Warming Treaty, Wash. Post, Mar. 28, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar; Drozdiak, William & Pianin, Eric, U.S. Angers Allies over Climate Part, Wash. Post, Mar. 29, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar. A European Union delegation dispatched to Washington to obtain reconsideration of the decision was unsuccessful. See Pianin, Eric, U.S. Rebuffs Europeans Urging Change of Mind on Kyoto Treaty, Wash. Post, Apr. 4, 2001, at A6.Google Scholar
13 See Revkin, Andrew C., 178 Nations Reach a Climate Accord; U.S. Only Looks On, N.Y. Times, July 24, 2001, at A1 Google Scholar. For a brief analysis of the compromise agreement, see World Wildlife Fund Press Release on Analysis of the Bonn Political Agreement on the Kyoto Protocol (July 27, 2001), at <http://www.panda.org/climate/final_deal.doc>.
14 Paula J. Dobriansky, Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs, Remarks to Resumed Sixth Conference of Parties (COP-6) to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (July 23, 2001), at <http://www.state.gov/g/oes/climate/index.cfm?docid=4191>.
- 3
- Cited by