Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:19:42.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Second Circuit Recognizes Common Law Immunity of Former Senior Israeli Intelligence Official

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 584 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Matar v. Dichter, 563 F.3d 9 (2d Cir. 2009).

2 28 U.S.C. §1350 (2000).

3 28 U.S.C. §§1602-1611 (2000 & Supp. Ill 2003).

4 563F.3datll.

5 538F.3d71 (2d Cir. 2008).

6 Compare Belhas v. Ya’alon, 515 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (suggesting that defendant’s employment status at time a suit is brought is not controlling) with Yousuf v. Samantar, 552 F.3d 371, 381-83 (4th Cir. 2009) (relevant statutory language is FSIA is in present tense, so past officials not covered).

7 5 6 3 F . 3 d a t l 3 .

8 [Editors’s Note: The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon, 11 U.S. (7 Cranch) 116 (1812).]

9 563 F.3d at 14 (citation omitted).