Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:08:09.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Barring of FRY Representative at UN Security Council

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 94 , Issue 4 , October 2000 , pp. 677 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Professor Murphy wishes to acknowledge the superb research assistance provided by Cameron Alford, Matthew Haws, and Shana Stanton for volume 94.

1 See Letter Dated 27 April 1992 from the Chargé d’Affaires A.I. of the Permanent Mission of Yugoslavia to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, annex, UN Doc. S/23877 (1992).

2 For the United States reaction, see Letter Dated 5 May 1992 from the Deputy Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, UN Doc. S/23879 (1992). For the European Union reaction, see Letter Dated 12 May 1992 from the Permanent Representatives of Belgium, France, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United Nations Addressed to the President of the Security Council, annex, UN Doc. S/23906 (1992).

3 Conference on Yugoslavia, Arbitration Commission Opinion No. 10, UN GAOR, 48th Sess., annex, Agenda Item 8, at 8, UN Doc. A/48/874 (1994), reprinted in 31 ILM 1525 (1992).

4 SC Res. 777, UN SCOR, 47th Sess., 3116th mtg. at 34, UN Doc. S/RES/777 (1992) (adopted by 12 votes, with China, India, and Zimbabwe abstaining). The Security Council previously had noted that Serbia and Montenegro’s claim to continue automatically the UN membership of the former Yugoslavia “has not been generally accepted.” SC Res. 757, UN SCOR, 47th Sess., 3082d mtg. at 13, UN Doc. S/RES/757 (1992).

5 See GA Res. 47/1, UN GAOR, 47th Sess., Supp. No. 49, at 12, UN Doc. A/47/49 (1992). For the debate on the legal right of Serbia and Montenegro to continue as a member of the United Nations based on the membership of the former Yugoslavia, compare Blum, Yehuda Z., UN Membership of the “New” Yugoslavia: Continuity or Break? 86 AJIL 830 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, with Correspondents’ Agora: UN Membership of the Former Yugoslavia, 87 AJIL 240 (1993)

6 The UN legal counsel determined in 1992 that FRY representatives could participate in certain UN activities. See 1992 UN Y.B. 139–40, UN Sales No. E.93.I.1. For information on the FRY permanent mission, see <http://www.un.int/yugoslavia/>.

7 See Lynch, Colum, U. S. Seeks Envoy’s Ouster, Wash. Post, June 24, 2000, at A18 Google Scholar.

8 See UN Doc. S/PV.4164 (June 23, 2000).