Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:13:57.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Will there be people in sustainable ecosystems? Designing an educational mosaic for the 22nd century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Charles Francis  and
James King
Charles Francis
Affiliation:
Professor, Dept. of Agronomy, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0910.
James King
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Communication and Computing Services, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0910.
Get access

Abstract

Unlike other creatures, humans have the unique ability to delay their own extinction. We can store, analyze and transmit information to the next generations, and education helps us adapt to varied ecological situations. Looking beyond the 21st century to a post-industrial society where biological systems will emerge as the most renewable and sustainable activities on the planet, we need educational systems to prepare creative problem solvers who can confront and adapt to change and be willing to move toward lifelong growth and learning. Students need to understand the complexity of biological systems and the importance of connectedness. We need to educate them about watersheds and ecosystems, about the roles of a wide range of species and how they interact, and about long-term sustainability. Some programs already involve interactive student activities, case studies, and real world examples, and have empowered students to formulate their own approaches to challenges. A new initiative in the North Central region includes a structured experiential program in practical agroecosystem studies that taps into the technical and financial resources in the region's 12 land-grant universities and other organizations. In the future, we will need to forge more linkages between education and research, understand the impacts of alternative strategies for food production and other human needs, and search for ways to empower people to pursue their own educational agendas. This approach should include a mosaic of educational opportunities that will promote the survival of our species beyond the 22nd century.

Keywords

teachinglearningfuture education systemssustainable agriculture
Type
Selected Papers from the Conference on Science and Sustainability, Seattle, Washington, October 24–26, 1993
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 9 , Issue 1-2 , June 1994 , pp. 16 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.AAHE Assessment Forum. 1992. Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning. Amer. Assoc. Higher Education, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
2.Argyris, C. 1991. Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review 69(3):99–109.Google Scholar
3.Barone, C.A. 1993. New interpretations of old rules, or if the ocean is on the right, you are headed North. CAUSE/EFFECT 16(1):11–16.Google Scholar
4.Bonwell, C.C., and Eison, J.A.. 1991. Active learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education. Rep. No. 1. George Washington Univ., School of Education & Human Development, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
5.Cohen, A. 1993. A new educational paradigm. Phi Delta Kappan (June):791–795.Google Scholar
6.Coombs, N. 1992. Teaching in the information age. EDUCOM Review 27(2):28–31.Google Scholar
7.Cox, C.E. 1993. The use of independent study courses to teach lifelong learning skills. NACTA J. 37(1):33–36.Google Scholar
8.Crookston, R.K., Stanford, M.J., and Simmons, S.R.. 1993. The worth of a sparrow: A decision case in university research and public relations. J. Natural Resource and Life Science Education 22:134–138.Google Scholar
9.Cross, T.L. 1993. AgVenture: A farming strategy computer game. J. Natural Resource and Life Science Education 22:103–107.Google Scholar
10.Didsbury, H.F. 1993. The Years Ahead: Perils, Problems, and Promises. World Future Soc., Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
11.Edwards, C.A. 1987. The concept of integrated systems in lower input/sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:148–152.Google Scholar
12.Eisely, L. 1957. The Immense Journey. Vintage Books, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
13.Francis, C.A., Harwood, R.R., and Parr, J.F.. 1986. The potential for regenerative agriculture in the developing world. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hoffman, E. 1988. The Right to Be Human: A Biography of Abraham Maslow. Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc., Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
15.Johnson, B.B. 1990. Nebraska's tax system: At the crossroads. Business in Nebraska 45(546):1–5.Google Scholar
16.Kaplan, J. 1989. Unexpected Journeys: The Art and Life of Remedios Varo. Abbeville Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
17.Kelly, K. 1992. Biosphere 2 at one. Whole Earth Review 77(Winter):90–105.Google Scholar
18.King, J.W. 1993. Confronting the future: Creating a new learning environment. Teaching & Learning Center Newsletter (Univ. of Nebraska) 15(2):1–3.Google Scholar
19.Kinnaman, D.E. 1993. Technology and situated cognition. Technology and Learning 14(1):86.Google Scholar
20.Klonglan, G.E. 1992. Why the emphasis on problem solving skills? Workshop on Teaching Problem Solving Skills, Dec. 21. College of Agric., Iowa State Univ., Ames.Google Scholar
21.Knuth, K.S. (ed). 1987. Listen to the Land. EPCOT Center, Walt Disney World, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
22.Krinke, V.B., Dieleman, L.S., Gleason, S., and Caldwell, V.B.. 1992. Foodgame: A simulation to explore food access issues. J. Nutrition Education 24:78A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Lev, L.S., McGrath, D., Murray, H., and Williams, R.D.. 1993. Organizing and conducting farmer-scientist focus sessions. J. Natural Resource and Life Science Education 22(2):148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Lovelock, J. 1979. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
25.Mason, S.C. 1991. An integrative, problem-solving approach to teaching crop production. J. Agronomic Education 20:19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Michaels, T.E. 1993. Computer, video, and rapid-cycling plant projects in an undergraduate plant breeding course. J. Natural Resource and Life Science Education 22:100–102.Google Scholar
27.Pressley, M., Burkell, J., Cariglia-Bull, T., Lysynchuk, L., McGoldrick, J.A., Schneider, B., Snyder, B.L., Symans, S., and Woloshyn, V.E.. 1990. Cognitive Instructional Strategies that Really Work. Brookline Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
28.Resnick, L.B., and Klopfer, L.E.. 1989. Toward the Thinking Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
29.Salvador, R.J., Schmidt, A.G., and Miller, B.E.. 1993. Sustainable agriculture course taught nationally via satellite. J. Natural Resource and Life Science Education 22:11–21.Google Scholar
30.Sheingold, K. 1991. Restructuring for learning of technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappan 73(1):17–27.Google Scholar
31.Soleri, P. 1973. The Bridge between Matter and Spirit: Is Matter Becoming Spirit? Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
32.Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E.. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and the Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar