Skip to main content Accessibility help

Sheep stocking under traditional and improved grazing systems in the cereal-sheep system of Castile-La Mancha (south-central Spain)

  • Rafael Caballero (a1)


Land-based systems of low stocking rate are usually associated with low environmental concerns. However, we hypothesized that traditional unrestructured grazing systems may represent more environmental costs than benefits. Community-based research work was conducted in the 1990s in the cereal-sheep system of Castile–La Mancha, with the objective of assessing the typology of the system, including the grazing structures and social groups involved in grazing management. Results showed that traditional management represented a heterogeneous spatio-temporal distribution of grazing at the regional level, with high variability at the local level. Occasional overgrazing may occur, but a trend towards fewer grazing-days with correspondingly more indoor feeding and widespread underuse of grazing resources was more apparent. Proposals to improve the grazing system reached a high degree of consensus among farmers, but the two social groups (cultivators and landless pastoralists) showed divergent views in some important management issues. The imbalance in group numbers indicated that collective action is difficult to achieve. Implementation of improved grazing practices would require a policy intervention based on the disentangled constraints and consensus among interested farmers.



Hide All
1.Babbie, E. R. 1973. Survey Research Method. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
2.Baldock, D., 1998. Rural development and nature conservation with special attention to LFAs. Agenda 2000 and Prospect for the Environment. European Forum for Nature Conservation and Pastoralism. Occasional Publication No. 16:1314.
3.BMDP. 1992. BMDP Statistical Software Inc. University of California Press, Los Angeles, California.
4.Brouwer, F., Baldock, D., Godeschalk, F., and Beaufoy, G.. 1997. Marginalisation of agricultural land in Europe. In Laker, J. and Milne, J. (eds.). Livestock Systems in European Rural Development. Macalauy Land Use Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. p. 2532.
5.Caballero, R. 1993. An expert's survey on the role of legumes in arable farming systems of the Mediterranean area. J. Sustainable Agric. 3:133154.
6.Caballero, R. 1999. Castile-La Mancha: A cereal-sheep farming system under change. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14:188192.
7.Caballero, R. 2001. Typology of cereal-sheep farming systems in Castile-La Mancha (south-central Spain). Agric. Systems 68:215232.
8.Caballero, R. 2002. Policy schemes and targeted technologies in a cereal-sheep farming system. Agric. Human Values 19:6374.
9.Caballero, R., Rioperez, J., Fernández, E., Arauzo, M., and Hemaiz, P.J.. 1992. Performance of Manchega ewes grazing cereal stubbles and cultivated pastures. Small Ruminant Res. 7:315329.
10.Correal, E., and Sotomayor, J.A.. 1998. Sistemas ovino-cereal y su repercusión sobre el medio natural. Pastos 28:137180.
11.De la Cuesta, J.M. 1991. Legislación agraria en Castilla y León. Actas del 2° Congreso de Derecho Agrario International. Asociación Española de Derecho Agrario (ed.). Universidad de Oviedo, Spain, p. 183193.
12.Gómez Sal, A., and Rodriguez, M.E.. 1998. Los recursos y el medio ambiente In Universidad de Alcalá (ed.). Ciencias de la Tierra y el Medio Ambiente. Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, p. 101120.
13.Hodgson, J. 1990. Grazing Management. Science into Practice. Longman Handbooks in Agriculture, Harlow, England.
14.ICARDA. 1998. Indices of sustainability in a long-term rainfed wheat/legumes rotation. Annual Report 1997. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria, p. 3940.
15.INE. 1998. Contabilidad Regional de España. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid.
16.JCCM. 2000. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla- La Mancha. Ley de Ordenación del Aprovechamiento de Pastos, Hierbas y Rastrojeras. Consejería de Agricultura y Medio Ambiente, DOCM No. 122, Toledo, Spain, p. 1183111838.
17.Jones, M. J. 1992. Cereal production and its relationship to livestock: The point of view of the agronomist. In Guessous, F., Kabbali, A., and Narjisse, H. (eds.). Livestock in the Mediterranean Cereal Production Systems. Publication No 49. European Association of Animal Production (EAAP). Pudoc Scientific.Wageningen, The Netherlands, p. 1419.
18.Lacasta, C. 1995. Investigaciones sobre el secano en Castilla-La Mancha. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha, Madrid.
19.Linston, H. A., and Turoff, M. (eds). 1975. The Delphi Method. Techniques and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
20.Marton, A. 1988. Sampling and non-sampling errors in surveys. Seminario internacional de Estadística en Euskadi. Instituto Vasco de Estadística, Cuaderno No. 15, Bilbao, Spain.
21.Milchunas, D. G., and Lauenrot, W.K.. 1993. Qualitative effect of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecol. Monog. 63 (4):237366.
22.M° de Agricultura. 1997. Anuario de Estadística Agraria. Secretaria General Técnica, Madrid.
23.Molina, E., Ferret, A., Caja, G., Calsamiglia, S., Such, X., and Gasa, J.. 2001. Comparison of voluntary food intake, apparent digestibility, digest kinetics and digestive tract content in Manchega and Lacaune dairy sheep in late pregnancy and early and mid lactation. Animal Sci. 72:209221.
24.Nieto, A. 1959. Ordenación de pastos, hierbas y rastrojeras. Junta Provincial de Fomento Pecuario, Vol. 1, Valladolid, Spain.
25.OECD. 2000. Agricultural Policy Reform: Development and Prospects. OECD Policy Brief. June 2000. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
26.Olson, M. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
27.Papastylianou, I. 1999. Estimation of nitrogen fixed by legumes in long-term vs short-term cropping systems. Agron. J. 91:329334.
28.Parker, C. F. 1990. Role of animals in sustainable agriculture. In Edwards, C.A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R.H., and House, G. (eds.). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, Iowa. p. 238245.
29.Petersen, J. E., and Baldock, D.. 2000. Conference on environmental standards and cross-compliance in agriculture. La Cañada 13:910.
30.Power, J. F. 1987. Legumes: Their potential role in agricultural production. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:6973.
31.Ruiz, M. F., and García, S.A. (eds.). 1998. Mesta, transhumancia y lana en la España moderna. Crítica-Grijalbo, Barcelona, Spain.
32.Steinfeld, H., de Haan, C., and Blackburn, H.. 1998. Livestock and the environment. In Lutz, E. (ed.). Agriculture and the Environment. Perspectives on Sustainable Rural Development. The World Bank. Washington, DC. p. 283301.
33.Thomson, S. F. 1987. Feeding systems and sheep husbandry in the barley belt of Syria. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria.


Sheep stocking under traditional and improved grazing systems in the cereal-sheep system of Castile-La Mancha (south-central Spain)

  • Rafael Caballero (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed