Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:16:58.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feasibility of cereal straw for industrial utilization in Minnesota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

N.C. Wagner ,
S. Ramaswamy  and
U. Tschirner
N.C. Wagner
Affiliation:
Research Specialist, Department of Wood and Paper Science, University of Minnesota, Kaufert Laboratory, 2004 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108.
S. Ramaswamy*
Affiliation:
Associate Professors, Department of Wood and Paper Science, University of Minnesota, Kaufert Laboratory, 2004 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108.
U. Tschirner
Affiliation:
Associate Professors, Department of Wood and Paper Science, University of Minnesota, Kaufert Laboratory, 2004 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108.
*
Corresponding author is S. Ramaswamy (sramaswa@mercury.forestry.umn.edu)
Get access

Abstract

A pre-economic feasibility study was undertaken to determine the potential of cereal straw for industrial utilization in Minnesota. Specifically, utilizing straw for pulp and paper manufacture was of interest. The availability of cereal straw fiber supplies at various locations across the state of Minnesota, along with pre-processing issues such as transportation, harvesting, handling, and storage, are discussed and priced. The greatest economic advantage of straw for industrial use appears to be the low cost of the raw material compared to traditional raw materials. This also provides an excellent opportunity for additional income for farmers. The methodology and information provided here should be helpful in evaluating the feasibility of utilizing straw for other industrial purposes in other parts of the world. However, in some Third World countries, long-standing on-farm, traditional uses of cereal straws for fuel, fiber, and animal feed may limit their availability for industrial utilization.

Keywords

pulp millsstraw availabilitystraw procurementstraw storagestraw transportation
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2000 , pp. 2 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 1996. Pulp and paper production from straw. Bi-weekly Bull. 9(2). Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 4 p.Google Scholar
2.American Forest and Paper Association. 1997. Statistics of Paper, Paperboard and Wood Pulp. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3.Atchison, J.E. 1996. Twenty-five years of global progress in nonwood plant fiber repulping. TAPPI J. 79(10):87–95.Google Scholar
4.Atchison, J.E. 1998. Update on global use of non-wood plant fibers and some prospects for their greater use in the United States. 1998 Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry Proceedings. North American Nonwood Fiber Symposium, February 17–18, 1998, Atlanta, Georgia. TAPPI Press, Atlanta. p. 13–42.Google Scholar
5.Atchison, J.E., and McGovern, J.N.. 1983. History of paper and the importance of non-wood plant fibers. Pulp and Paper Manufacture 1:154–156.Google Scholar
6.EDF. 1996. Non-wood plant fibers as alternative fiber sources for papermaking. Paper Task Force White Paper 13. Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
7. EPA. 1993. Pulp and Paper Industry Cluster Proposed Regulations, 40 CFR part 634 and 430. Federal Register 58(241):66–77. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
8.Ergolu, H., and Usta, M.. 1988. Oxygen bleaching of soda oxygen wheat straw pulp. Nonwood Plant Fiber Pulping Progress Report 18:89–94. Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
9.FAO. 1994. Pulp and Paper Towards 2010: An Executive Summary. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
10.Gupta, S.C., Onstad, C.A., and Larson, W.E.. 1979. Predicting the effects of tillage and crop residue management on soil erosion. J. Soil Water Conserv. 34(2):74–98.Google Scholar
11.Hurter, R.W., and Riccio, F.A. Jr., 1998. Why CEO's don't want to hear about nonwoods—or should they? 1998 Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry Proceedings. North American Nonwood Fiber Symposium, February 17–18, 1998, Atlanta, Georgia. TAPPI Press, Atlanta, p. 1–6.Google Scholar
12.Industry Canada. 1996. Strategis home page. Web site http://www.strategis.ic.gc.ca (accessed 1996).Google Scholar
13.Jeyasingam, J.T. 1988. Critical analysis of straw pulping methods—worldwide. Nonwood Plant Fiber Pulping: Progress Rep. 18:103–112. TAPPI, New York.Google Scholar
14.Koukios, E.G., Saeid, I.B.J., Econodides, D.G., and Valkanas, G.N.. 1986. Oxygen delignification of prehydrolyzed wheat straw. Nonwood Plant Fiber Pulping: Progress Rep. 16:13–16. TAPPI, New York.Google Scholar
15.Lazarus, W. 1997. Minnesota Farm Custom Rate Survey. FS-3700-A. Univ. of Minnesota, Minnesota Extension Service, St. Paul.Google Scholar
16.Lindgren, R.J. 1996. Availability and quality of water from drift aquifers in Marshall, Pennington, Polk, and Red Lake Counties, Northwestern Minnesota. Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 95–4201. U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
17.Lindstrom, M.J., Skidmore, E.L., Gupta, S.C., and Onstad, C.A.. 1979. Soil conservation limitations on removal of crop residues for energy production. J. Environ. Qual. 8:533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.MacLeod, M. 1988. Nonwood fiber: Number 2, and trying harder: An interview with Dr. Joseph E. Atchison. TAPPI J. 71(8):50–54.Google Scholar
19.Miller, Freeman. 1998. Lockwood-Post's Directory of the Pulp, Paper, and Allied Trades. Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
20.Miller, Freeman. 1999. Lockwood-Post's Directory of the Pulp, Paper, and Allied Trades. Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
21.Milton, T., Petersen, H., Dahlman, R., and Krantz, J. (eds.). 1995. Minnesota Forest Products Directory, 1995–97 Edition. BU-1390-S. Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry; Univ. of Minnesota, Minnesota Extension Service, St. Paul.Google Scholar
22.Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Service. 1997. Minnesota Agricultural Statistics. Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture, St. Paul, MN; U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
23.Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Service. 1998. Minnesota Agricultural Statistics. Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture, St. Paul; U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agriculture Statistics Service, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.nass.usda.gov/mn/ (verified Nov. 1999).Google Scholar
24.Misra, D.K. 1983. Cereal straw. Pulp and Paper Manufacture 3:82–93. Joint Textbook Committee of the Paper Industry, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
25.Moore, G. 1996. Nonwood Fibre Applications in Papermaking. Pira International, Surrey, U.K.Google Scholar
26.North Dakota Agricultural Statistics Service. 1998. North Dakota Agricultural Statistics. Ag Statistics 67. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo; U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
27.Pineault, D., and Young, R.. 1998. Long-term North American pulp and paper review. World Pulp Monthly (July). Bedford, MA.Google Scholar
28.Precision Marketing. 1997. Thief River Falls Cereal Precision Marketing, Inc., Final Report. Fargo, ND.Google Scholar
29.Rao, Y.S., and Maheshwari, S.. 1987. Bleaching characteristics of wheat straw pulp. Nonwood Plant Fiber Pulping: Progress Rep. 17:111–125. TAPPI, New York.Google Scholar
30.Straw to Gold Conference Proceedings, Symposium 1995. Winnipeg, Manitoba, October 23–26 (unpublished proceedings).Google Scholar
31.Streed, E. 1998. Making a profit with poplar. Agroforestry Advantage 1(3). Center for Integrated Natural Resource and Agricultural Management, University of Minnesota, St. Paul.Google Scholar
32.Tonneson, L. 1997. Straw values. The Farmer/Dakota Farmer 38(April): 1–12.Google Scholar
33.USDA. 1994. Farming with High Residue for Profit and Erosion Control. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
34.Wilcke, W.F., Cuomo, G., and Fox, C.. 1999. Preserving the value of dry stored hay. FO-7404-B. University of Minnesota Extension, St Paul.Google Scholar
35.Wilson, A. 1995. Straw: The next great building material? Environ. Bldg. News 4(3). Available at Web site http://www.ebuild.com/Archives/Features/Straw.html (verified Oct. 1999).Google Scholar