Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Challenges in designing ecological agriculture education: A Nordic perspective on change

  • Charles A. Francis (a1), Geir Lieblein (a2), Juha Helenius (a3), Lennart Salomonsson (a4), Hanne Olsen (a5) and John Porter (a6)...

Abstract

Educators in ecological agriculture are developing learning environments that differ in three fundamental ways from conventional teaching in agricultural universities and colleges. First, increased emphasis on food and production systems will expand and complement the current focus on specific disciplines and technologies. Second, introduction of research methods and learning objectives from social sciences will broaden the potentials for students to understand the complexities of food systems and the people who make them work. Third, action research and education will move learning activities into the agroecosystems environment and the human landscape, where students will learn from a broad array of people and experiences. This design of a new learning environment will enhance the education of students to serve agricultural and food systems well into a future that is changing at an accelerating rate.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author is C.A. Francis (cfrancis2@unl.edu).

References

Hide All
1.Bawden, R.J. 1991. Systems thinking and practices in agriculture. J. Dairy Sci. 74:23622373.
2.Berkes, F., Folke, C., and Colding, J. (eds.). 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge University Press, New York.
3.Borsari, B. 1998. Sustainable agriculture: Concepts and educational applications. In Borsari, B. and Vidrine, M.F. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture Seminar Proceedings. Vol. 1. Low Input Agriculture: Feasible Alternatives to Conventional Agricultural Practices. Louisiana State University at Eunice Press, Eunice, LA. p. 1419.
4.Brandt, J., Tress, B., and Tress, G. (eds.). 2000. Multifunctional Landscapes: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management. Conference material for international conference, October 20–21, 2000. Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, Denmark. Web site http://www.geo.ruc.dk/vlb/ML-con tents.pdf.
5.Bruner, J. 1997. The Culture of Education. 2nd ed.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6.Checkland, P. 1989. Soft systems methodology. In Rosenhead, J. (ed.). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty, and Conflict. John Wiley, London, p. 71100.
7.Dewey, J. 1997. Experience and Education. Macmillan, New York. Reprinted from Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and Education. Collier Books, New York.
8.Glesne, C., and Peshkin, A.. 1999. Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. 2nd ed.Addison Wesley, Glenview, IL.
9.Gross, R. 1991. Peak Learning. Tardier/Putnam, New York.
10.Jacobsen, D.Y. 1999. Problembasertlaering og kulturer for laering (Problem-based learning and cultures for learning). UNIPED 1:618 (in Norwegian).
11.Knowles, M.S. 1988. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Rev. ed. Cambridge University Press, New York.
12.Knowles, M.S., Holton, E.F., and Swanson, R.A.. 1998. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 5th ed.Gulf Professional Publ. Co., Houston, TX.
13.Kunkle, H.O., Maw, I.L., and Skaggs, C.L. (eds.). 1996. Revolutionizing Higher Education in Agriculture: Framework for Change. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
14.Lacy, W.B. 1997. Educating lifelong learners for the American food system. In Lockeretz, W. (ed.). Visions of American Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames. p. 219230.
15.Lieblein, G., Francis, C., and King, J.. 2000. Conceptual framework for structuring future agricultural colleges and universities in industrial countries. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 6(4):213222.
16.Lieblein, G., Francis, C.A., Salomonsson, L., and Sriskandarajah, N.. 1999. Ecological agriculture research: Increasing competence through PhD courses. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 6(1):3146.
17.Lockeretz, W. (ed.). 1997. Visions of American Agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
18.Neill, W.H., Vietor, D.M., and Thompson, P.B.. 1996. Learning systems: One scenario for systemic change. In Kunkle, H.O., Maw, I.L., and Skaggs, C.L. (eds.). Revolutionizing Higher Education in Agriculture: Framework for Change. Iowa State University Press, Ames. p. 95101.
19.Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20.Pickett, C.H., and Bugg, R.L. (eds.). 1998. Enhancing Biological Control: Habitat Management to Promote Natural Enemies of Agricultural Pests. University of California Press, Berkeley.
21.Popham, W.J. 1992. Educational Evaluation. 3rd ed.Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
22.Röling, N.G., and Wagemakers, M.A.E.. 1998. Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press, New York.
23.Salvador, R.J., Countryman, D.W., and Miller, B.E.. 1995. Incorporating problembased experiential teaching in the agriculture curriculum. J. Nat. Resour. Life Sci. Educ. 24(1):5863.
24.Savory, A. 1988. Holistic Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC.
25.Schubert, W.H. 1995. Students as action researchers: Historical precedent and contradiction. Curric. Teach. 10(2):314.
26.Young, R. 1992. Critical Theory and Classroom Talk. Clevedon Press, Philadelphia, PA.

Keywords

Challenges in designing ecological agriculture education: A Nordic perspective on change

  • Charles A. Francis (a1), Geir Lieblein (a2), Juha Helenius (a3), Lennart Salomonsson (a4), Hanne Olsen (a5) and John Porter (a6)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed