Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:46:32.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Robert D. Lumsden  and
George C. Papavizas
Robert D. Lumsden
Affiliation:
Research Plant Pathologists, Biocontrol of Plant Diseases Laboratory, Plant Sciences Institute, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705.
George C. Papavizas
Affiliation:
Research Plant Pathologists, Biocontrol of Plant Diseases Laboratory, Plant Sciences Institute, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD 20705.
Get access

Abstract

Soilborne plant pathogens cause major economic losses in agricultural crops, and the present methods for control of diseases brought about by these pathogens are inadequate. Alternatives are also needed to substitute for the use of chemical fungicides. Many of these are known to induce tumors in experimental animals and are thus regarded by some investigators as potential human carcinogens when present as residues in food and water. In addition, such alternative control measures are needed because of the potential threat of development of resistance to fungicides, especially systemic fungicides, by fungal plant pathogens, and because of nontarget side effects on other plant pathogens and on beneficial microorganisms. Alternative disease control is sometimes possible through development of crop plants resistant to disease. Unfortunately, however, resistance is lacking or not available for many diseases caused by soilborne plant pathogens. Another biological means of controlling disease which is presently gaining much attention is biological control. Several systems of biological control are presently being explored and may be developed in a few years into reliable alternatives to conventional chemical control methods. The use of the mycoparasite Sporidesmium sclerotivorum, for example, against several diseases caused by Sclerotinia species is promising. Talaromyces flavus may in the future be exploited for use against several wilt diseases caused by Verticillium dahliae. Finally, practical control of several diseases caused by Pythium spp., Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotium rolfsii may eventually become possible through the use of Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium virens. Development of these biological control systems will require much additional research directed toward a better understanding of the basic biology and mechanisms of action of beneficial fungi against plant pathogens. In addition, extensive cooperation will be required among research scientists, governmental agencies responsible for regulating the use of pestcontrol systems, and most importantly, private industry to develop biological control agents for the market and to coordinate acceptance and use by producers and acceptance by consumers.

Keywords

mycoparasitesSporidesmiumTalaromyces flavusTrichodermaGliocladiumroot pathogensSclerotiniaVerticilliumPythiumRhizoctoniaSclerotium
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 3 , Issue 2-3 , Spring-Summer 1988 , pp. 98 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Adams, P. B., and Ayers, W. A.. 1981. Sporidesmium sclerotivorum: Distribution and function in natural biological control of sclerotial fungi. Phytopathology 71:90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Adams, P. B., and Ayers, W. A.. 1982. Biological control of Sclerotinia lettuce drop in the field by Sporidesmium sclerotivorum. Phytopathology 72:485–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Adams, P. B., and Ayers, W. A.. 1985. The world distribution of the mycoparasites Sporidesmium sclerotivorum, Teratosperma oligocladum and Laterispora brevirama. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17:583–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ayers, W. A., Barnett, E. A., and Adams, P. B.. 1981. Germination of macroconidia and growth of Sporidesmium sclerotivorum in vitro. Can. J. Microbiol. 27:664–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Ayers, W. A., and Adams, P. B.. 1979. Mycoparasitism of sclerotia of Sclerotinia and Sclerotium species by Sporidesmium sclerotivorum. Can. J. Microbiol. 25:17–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Ayers, W. A., and Adams, P. B.. 1981. Mycoparasitism and its application to biological control of plant diseases. In Papavizas, G. C. (ed.). Biological Control in Crop Production. Allanheld, Osmun: Totowa, New Jersey, pp. 91–103.Google Scholar
7.Beagle-Ristaino, J. E., and Papavizas, G. C.. 1985. Biological control of Rhizoctonia stemcanker and black scurf. Phytopathology 75:560–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Boosalis, M. G. 1964. Hyperparasitism. Annu. Rev. Phytopathology 2:363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Cook, R. J., and Baker, K.. 1983. The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. The American Phytopathogical Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota. 539 pp.Google Scholar
10.Dekker, J. 1976. Acquired resistance to fungicides. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 14:405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gold, S. E., and Stanghellini, M. E.. 1985. Effects of temperature on Pythium root rot of spinach grown under hydroponic conditions. Phytopathology 75:333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Fravel, D. R., Marois, J. J., Lumsden, R. D., and Connick, W. J. Jr., 1985. Encapsulation of potential biocontrol agents in an alginateclay matrix. Phytopathology 75:774–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hallberg, G. R. 1987. Agricultural chemicals in ground water: Extent and implications. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 2:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hau, F. C., and Beute, M. K., 1983. Effects of chlorothalonil on the virulence and physiology of a nontargeted pathogen, Sclerotinia minor. Phytopathology 73:475–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Huisingh, D. 1974. Heavy metals: implications for agriculture. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 12:375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kim, K. K., Fravel, D. F., and Papavizas, G. C.. 1988. Role of glucose oxidase in the biocontrol of Verticillium dahliae by Talaromyces flavus. Phytopathology 78:488–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lewis, J. A., and Papavizas, G. C.. 1985. Characteristics of alginate pellets formulated with Trichoderma and gliocladium and their effect on the proliferation of fungi in soil. Plant Pathology 34:571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lumsden, R. D., and Locke, J. C.. 1989. Biological control of Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani damping-off with Gliocladium virens in soilless mix. Phytopathology 79: In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Marois, J. J., Johnson, S. A., Dunn, M. T., and Papavizas, G. C.. 1982. Biological control of Verticillium wilt of eggplant in the field. Plant Disease 66:1166–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Papavizas, G. C. 1981. Biological Control in Crop Production. Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research 5. Allanheld, Osmun Publishers, Inc., Totowa, New Jersey 07512.Google Scholar
21.Papavizas, G. C., Dunn, M. T., Lewis, J. A., and Beagle-Ristaino, J.. 1984. Liquid fermentation technology for experimental production of biocontrol fungi. Phytopathology 74:1171–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Papavizas, G. C., and Lumsden, R. D.. 1982. Biological control of soilborne fungal propagules. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 18:389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Rowe, R. C., Davis, J. R., Powelson, M. L., and Rouse, D. I.. 1987. Potato early dying: causal agents and management strategies. Plant Disease 71:482–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Tangley, L. 1987. Regulating pesticides in food. Bioscience 37:452–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Uecker, F. A., Ayers, W. A., and Adams, P. B.. 1978. A new hyphomycete on sclerotia of Sclerotia sclerotiorum. Mycotaxon 7:275–282.Google Scholar