Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:23:01.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An economic comparison of organic and conventional grain crops in a long-term agroecological research (LTAR) site in lowa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Kathleen Delate ,
Michael Duffy ,
Craig Chase ,
Ann Holste ,
Heather Friedrich  and
Noreen Wantate
Kathleen Delate*
Affiliation:
Departments of Agronomy and Horticulture, 106 Horticulture Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011–1100
Michael Duffy
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Iowa State University, 478E Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011–1100
Craig Chase
Affiliation:
Blackhawk County Extension Service, Iowa State University, Waterloo, IA.
Ann Holste
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Iowa State University, 478E Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011–1100
Heather Friedrich
Affiliation:
Departments of Agronomy and Horticulture, 106 Horticulture Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011–1100
Noreen Wantate
Affiliation:
Departments of Agronomy and Horticulture, 106 Horticulture Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011–1100
*
K. Delate (kdelate@iastate.edu).
Get access

Abstract

Based on the interest of organic and conventional farmers in Iowa in long-term analysis of organic systems, the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) site was established in 1998 to examine the agronomic and economic performance of conventional and organic systems, using certified organic production practices. We report the results of the economic analysis from 3 years of production (1999–2001). Using organic price premiums for organic crops, returns for corn within the organic corn-soybean-oat and corn-soybean-oat-alfalfa rotations were significantly greater than conventional corn-soybean rotation returns (US$126 ha−1). Com returns were not significantly different between the two organic rotations, at US$655 ha−1 and US$674 ha−1, respectively. Returns for soybean within the organic corn-soybean-oat and com-soybean-oat-alfalfa rotations were not significantly different, at US$1233 ha−1 and US$1326 ha−1, respectively. Organic soybean returns were significantly greater than conventional soybean crop returns (US$235 ha−1) in the corn-soybean rotation. Rotational 3-year average returns were US$180 ha−1 for the conventional corn-soybean rotation, compared to US$734 ha−1 for the organic corn-soybean-oat and US$739 ha−1 for the organic com-soybean-oat-alfalfa rotation.

Keywords

agricultural profitabilityconventional rotationseconomic returnslabor requirementsorganic rotationsproduction cost comparisons
Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 59 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altieri, M.A. 1995. Agroecology. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Brumfield, R.G., Rimal, A., and Reiners, S.. 2000. Comparative cost analyses of conventional, integrated crop management, and organic methods. HortTechnology. 10(4):785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusko, M. 1989. What really happens when you cut chemicals. New Farm (05/06): 19. Rodale Press, Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
Chase, C., and Duffy, M.. 1991. An economic comparison of conventional and reduced-chemical farming systems in Iowa. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6(4): 168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M.S., Ferris, H., Klonsky, K., Lanini, W.T., van Bruggen, A.H.C., and Zalom, F.G.. 1998. Agronomic, economic, and environmental comparison of pest management in conventional and alternative tomato and com systems in northern California. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 68:51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S., Klonsky, K., Livingston, P., and Temple, S.. 1999. Cropyield and economic comparisons of organic, low-input, and conventional farming systems in California's Sacramento Valley. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 14(3):109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delate, K.M. 2002. Using an agroecological approach to farming systems research. HortTechnology 12(3):345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delate, K.M., and Cambardella, C.. 1999. Comparison of organic and conventional rotations at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) site. Iowa State University Armstrong Research and Demonstration Farm Progress Report. College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, LA.Google Scholar
Delate, K.M., and Cambardella, C.. 2000. Comparison of 1999 organic and conventional rotations at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) site. Iowa State University Armstrong Research and Demonstration Farm Progress Report. College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Delate, K.M., and Cambardella, C.. 2001. Comparison of 2000 organic and conventional rotations at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) site. Iowa State University Armstrong Research and Demonstration Farm Progress Report. College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Delate, K.M., and Cambardella, C.. 2002. Comparison of 2001 organic and conventional rotations at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) site—Fourth year results. Iowa State University Armstrong Research and Demonstration Farm Progress Report. College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Delate, K.M., and De Witt, J.. 1999. Organic focus groups in Iowa. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture Annual Report, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Diebel, P.L., Williams, J.R., and Llewelyn, R.V.. 1995. An economic comparison of conventional and alternative cropping systems for a representative northeast Kansas farm. Rev. Agrie. Econ. 17(3):120–127.Google Scholar
Dobbs, T.L., and Smolik, J.D.. 1996. Productivity and profitability of conventional and alternative farming systems: A long-term on-farm paired comparison. J. Sustainable Agric. 9(1):63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, M. 1991. Economic considerations in sustainable agriculture for Midwestern farmers. In Rice, G.J. (ed.). Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education in the Field. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Duffy, M., and Smith, D.. 1999. Estimated costs of production in Iowa – 1999. Iowa State University Extension Communications, College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Duffy, M., and Smith, D.. 2000. Estimated costs of production in Iowa – 2000. Iowa State University Extension Communications, College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Duffy, M., and Smith, D.. 2001. Estimated costs of production in Iowa – 2001. Iowa State University Extension Communications, College of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, LA.Google Scholar
Greene, C. 2000. Organic agriculture gaining ground. Agricultural Outlook, 9–14 April. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hanson, J.C., Lichtenberg, E., and Peters, S.E.. 1997. Organic versus conventional grain production in the mid-Atlantic: An economic and farming system overview. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 12(1):2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman Group. 2001. Natural Sensibility, Typification of the New Wellness Consumer, Vol. 3 (2). Hartman Group, Bellevue, WA.Google Scholar
IDALS. 2000. Annual survey on organic production. Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship Diversification Bureau, Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar
Lampkin, N.H., and Padel, S.. 1994. Organic fanning and agricultural policy in Western Europe: An overview. In Midmore, P. and Lampkin, N.H. (eds.). The Economics of Organic Farming: An International Perspective. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. p. 437–454.Google Scholar
Liebhardt, W.C., Andrews, R.W., Culik, M.N., Harwood, R.R., Janke, R.R., Radke, J.K., and Rieger-Schwartz, S.L.. 1989. Crop production during conversion from conventional to low-input methods. Agron. J. 81:150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D.H.. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, R.J., Hill, S.B., Mehuys, G.R., and Henning, J.. 1993. Farm-scale agronomic and economic conversion from conventional to sustainable agriculture. Advances in Agron. 43:155–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OFRF. 2001. Organic Farming Research Foundation Information Bulletin No. 10, Summer 2001. Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
Olson, K.D., and Mahoney, P.R.. 1999. Long-term cropping studies at the University of Minnesota: The variable input cropping management system study. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
OTA. 2001. OTA Newsletter. Organic Trade Association, Greenfield. MA.Google Scholar
Reganold, J.P., Glover, J.D., Andrews, P.K., and Hinman, H.R.. 2001. Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410:926–929.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1988. SAS Procedures Guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Smolik, J.D., and Dobbs, T.L.. 1991. Crop yields and economic returns accompanying the transition to alternative farming systems. J. Production Agric. 4(4):153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T.L., and Rickerl, D.H.. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10(1):25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple, S.R., Somasco, O.A., Kirk, M., and Friedman, D.. 1994. Conventional, low-input, and organic farming systems compared. California Agric. 48:14–19.Google Scholar
USDA-AMS. 2002. National Organic Program. Final rule: 7 CFR Part 205. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Marketing Service, Washington. DC. Web site http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop (viewed 10 07 2002).Google Scholar
Walz, E. 1999. Final Results of the Third Biennial National Organic Farming Survey. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
Wander, M.M., Traina, S.J., Stinner, B.R., and Peters, S.E.. 1994. Organic and conventional management effects on biologically active soil organic matter pools. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:1130–1139.Google Scholar
Welsh, R. 1999. The economics of organic grain and soybean production in the Midwestern United States. Policy Studies Report No. 13. H.A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, Greenbelt, MD.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J., and Millers, V.. 1994. Influences of pesticide residue and environmental concerns on organic food preference among food cooperative members and non-members in Washington State. J. Nutrition Educ. 26:26–33.Google Scholar