Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Economic viability of the traditional farming system in the Ghouta, Oasis of Damascus, Syria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Sameer K. Alhamidi
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE–230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.
Bengt Håkansson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE–230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.
Mats Gustafsson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE–230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Get access

Abstract

The traditional farming system (TFS) in the Ghouta has been an integral pan of the social life and has contributed to the food supply of Damascus for millennia. Very little is known about this traditional and sustainable system, considered by many as a hindrance to development. This study is an attempt to analyze the economic perfonnance of this system. The objective is to evaluate the economic performance of the TFS and its impact on system viability. Three farms, representing the three different agricultural strategies in this area, were selected for data-collection. Participant observation was used to derive estimates of labor, costs and revenues, which are not recorded by farmers. These three farms formed a base for continuous contact with other farmers in the Ghouta. The average values, after cross-checking with these estimates and other farmers, were used in the economic analysis at three levels: production, family and market level. The production system of the Ghouta is adaptable to economic forces of a major city as the high level of market orientation of the TFS stimulates diversity of farms. It is concluded that the diversified farms managed by farmers in this area provide a satisfactory income, which is in harmony both with the social values and with preserving the system, the overall objective of the farmers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Alhamidi, S.K., Hillbur, P., Gustafsson, M., Ibrahim, J., and Larsson, H.. 2003a. A study of the sustainability of the traditional farming system in the Ghouta, oasis of Damascus, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Alhamidi, S. K., Gustafsson, M., Hillbur, P., and Larsson, H.. 2003b. The cultural background of the sustainability of tne traditional farming system in the Ghouta, Oasis of Damascus. Agriculture and Human Values, in press.Google Scholar
Allen, P., van Dusen, D., Lundy, J., and Gliessman, S.. 1991. Integrating social, environmental, and economic issues in sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 6(1):3439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, M.A. 1987. Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Westerview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Batie, S., and Taylor, B.. 1989. Widespread adoption of non-conventional agriculture: profitability and impacts. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 4(3–4):128134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianquis, A. 1989. La Reforme Agraire Dans la Ghouta de Damas. Institut Francais de Damas, Damas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, G.R. 1985. Agroecosystem analysis. Agricultural Administration 20:3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., Mageau, M., Norton, B., and Patten, B.C.. 1998. What is sustainability? In Rapport, D., Costanza, R., Epstein, P.R., Gaudet, C., and Levins, R. (eds). Ecosystem Health. Blackwell Science, Oxford, p. 231239.Google Scholar
Cyert, R.M., and March, J.G.. 1993. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell, USA.Google Scholar
Doppler, W. 1985. Planung, Evaluierung und Management von Entwicklungsprojekten. Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, Germany.Google Scholar
Håkansson, B. 1991. A decision system for production planning in horticulture. In van de Schilden, M. and van Lockeren Campagne, P. (eds). Horticultural Economics and Marketing. XXIIIrd International Horticultural Congress, No. 295. Florence, Italy. Acta Horticulturae, Technical Communication of ISHS (International Society for Horticultural Science), p. 195201.Google Scholar
Herdt, R.W., and Steiner, R.A.. 1995. Agricultural sustainability: Concepts and conundrums. In Barnett, V., Payne, R., and Steiner, R. (eds). Agricultural Sustainability: Economic, Environmental and Statistical Considerations. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. p. 313.Google Scholar
Innis, D.Q. 1997. Intercropping and the Scientific Basis of Traditional Agriculture. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurd Ali, M. 1949. Gougtet Dimashk (Damascus Ghouta). Damascus, Syria.Google Scholar
Pratt, B., and Loizos, P.. 1992. Choosing Research Methods. Data collection for development workers. Development Guidelines No. 7. Oxfam. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shaner, W.W., Philipp, P.F., and Schmehl, W.R.. 1982. Farming Systems Research and Development, Guidelines for Developing Countries. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Thurston, H.D. 1992. Sustainable Practices for Plant Disease Management in Traditional Farming Systems. Westview Press, Boulder, p. 114.Google Scholar
Turner, J., and Taylor, M.. 1989. Applied Farm Management. BSP Professional Books, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Wachholtz, R. 1996. Socio-economics of Bedouin farming system in dry areas of northern Syria. In Doppler, W. (ed.). Farming Systems and Resource Economics in the Tropics, Vol. 24. Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk, Kiel KG, Germany, p. 121163.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-898fc554b-5qzh9 Total loading time: 0.428 Render date: 2021-01-26T10:11:22.478Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Economic viability of the traditional farming system in the Ghouta, Oasis of Damascus, Syria
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Economic viability of the traditional farming system in the Ghouta, Oasis of Damascus, Syria
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Economic viability of the traditional farming system in the Ghouta, Oasis of Damascus, Syria
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *