No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Limits of Liberalism: Wrong to Others
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0361948600003213/resource/name/firstPage-S0361948600003213a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1986
References
1 J.S. Mill, On Liberty 10–11 (New York: W.W. Norton, 1975).Google Scholar
2 See Joel Feinberg, Abortion, in Tom Regan, ed., Matters of Life and Death 182 (New York: Random House, 1979).Google Scholar
3 Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969).Google Scholar
4 Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962).Google Scholar
5 Lambert v. California, 355 U.S. 255 (1957).Google Scholar
6 Compare Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), with Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).Google Scholar
7 Or, of course, patent infringements, breaches of express trust, racketeer-influenced corrupt organizational activity, or what not.Google Scholar
8 Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & Econ. 1 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 It is Judge Posner's. See Posner, An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, 85 Colum. L. Rev. 1193 (1985).Google Scholar
10 G. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law xix (Boston: Little, Brown, 1978) (emphasis added).Google Scholar