Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T21:20:56.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Whig Prince: Prince Rupert and the Court vs. Country Factions During the Reign of Charles II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Leslie Chree O'Malley
Get access

Extract

Considerable scholarly attention has been paid to the origins of political parties in England during the reign of King Charles II. Yet the fact that a prominent courtier and member of the king's own family, Prince Rupert, was also a leader of the opposition or “country” party has frequently been overlooked by historians. J. R. Jones, for example, in The First Whigs, fails to mention the prince, and even Rupert's biographer, Eliot Warburton, has dismissed the last decade in his subject's life by saying that, after 1673, the ailing prince was too ill to play a role in English government.

But Prince Rupert was, in fact, very active politically in the two decades following the Restoration. He sat in the House of Lords as duke of Cumberland and served on parliamentary committees. He had a seat on the Privy Council and was a member of all four of its standing committees. Rupert was often selected to serve the crown: as special emissary to his friend, Emperor Leopold I, in 1661 with the task of preventing an Anglo-imperial rupture over the marriage of King Charles to a Portuguese princess; as England's representative in negotiations with Denmark in 1669 and Brandenburg in 1670; as joint admiral of the fleet during the second Anglo-Dutch War, and de facto commander of the fleet during the third conflict with the United Provinces. Although the prince became openly critical of the royal government as early as 1667 and, by 1673, had allied with Anthony Ashley Cooper, first earl of Shaftesbury, to form an opposition group, the future country or Whig party, he also retained many ties with the court.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Winter 1976 , pp. 333 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Part of the reason for this omission is that the usual sources for England's history during this period, the Calendar of State Papers Domestic, as well as the British Museum's list of councillors for the reconstructed Privy Council of April. 1679. fail to mention Rupert's political activities. In addition, there was the prince's caution in avoiding involvement in any action which might be considered treason. He was, after all, a German, born in Bohemia, and, like his cousin Charles II, Rupert did not wish to resume the wanderings which had occupied the first forty years of his life. For these reasons, it is necessary to work from other sources to reconstruct Rupert's political role: the diplomatic reports of foreign representatives at the London court (Colbert de Croissy, Ruvigny, Nauvitz, Waldstein) now in the Public Record Office and the Viennese archives; Rupert's letters to his sister Sophie now in the Hanoverian state archives; contemporary letters and diaries (for example, Burnet, Essex, Pepys, Halifax); and the records of the Privy Council Committee for Intelligence and the Journals of the House Lords.

2 All dates are old style except where otherwise noted. The year, however, has been adjusted to begin on January 1 rather than March 25.

3 August 31, 1664, Pepys, Samuel, The Diary of Samuel Pepys, ed. Wheatley, Henry B., 2 vols, (New York, 1942), 1:265Google Scholar; Charles II to Henriette of Orleans. September 9, 1664, ed. SirBryant, Arthur, The Letters, Speeches and Declarations of King Charles II (New York, 1968), p. 164.Google Scholar

4 List of the English fleet, March 29, 1665, Penn, Granville, Memorials of the Professional Life and Times of Sir William Penn, 2 vols. (London, 1833), II:Google Scholar, between pages 316 and 317.

5 November 6, 1665, Pepys, , Diary, II:266.Google Scholar

6 Rupert and Albemarle to the commissioners of the ordnance. April 24. 1666. in Rupert, Prince and Monck, George, Duke of Albemarle, The Rupert and Monck Letter Book, eds. Powell, J. R. and Timings, E. K., (London, 1969), p. 14Google Scholar; same to Denis Gauden, April 24, 1666, ibid.; same to Coventry, April 24, 1666, ibid., pp. 14-15; same to commissioners of ordnance, April 28, 1666, ibid., p. 27.

7 October 23, 1667, Milward, John, The Diary of John Milward, ed. Robbins, Caroline, (Cambridge, Mass., 1938), p. 95Google Scholar; October 8 (incorrect date, actually October 24), Marvell to Lord Mayor of London, Marvell, Andrew, The Poems and Letters of Andrew Marvell, ed. Margoliouth, H. M., 2 vols. (Oxford, 1971), II:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 October 31, 1667, Milward, p. 106.

9 October 26, 1667, Marvell to Anthony Lambert, Mayor, and the Aldermen of Kingston-upon-Hull, Marvell, , Letters, II:59Google Scholar; editor's notes on “Last Instructions to a Painter,” ibid., 1:358-59.

10 Burghclere, Lady Winifred, George Villiers, Second Duke of Buckingham (New York, 1903), p. 68.Google Scholar

11 Journals of the House of Lords, XII.

12 November 21, 1667, Milward, p. 134.

13 Journals of the House of Lords, XII.

14 Roberts, Clayton, The Growth of Responsible Government in Stuart England (Cambridge, 1966), pp. 176–77.Google Scholar

15 Foxcroft, H. C., The Life and Letters of Sir George Savile, First Marquis of Halifax, 2 vols. (New York, 1898), I:64Google Scholar; Roberts, pp. 174-75; Chapman, Hester, Great Villiers (London, 1949), p. 124.Google Scholar

16 Barbour, Violet, Henry Bennett, Earl of Arlington (Washington, 1914), p. 129.Google Scholar

17 Colbert de Croissy to Louis XIV, July 14/24, 1671, PRO 31/3/126; same to same, October 22/November 1, 1671, ibid.

18 Westergaard, Waldemar, The First Triple Alliance (New Haven, 1947), pp. xxiv–xxviGoogle Scholar; Brinkmann, C., “The Relations between England and Germany: 1660 to 1688,” English Historical Review, XXIV (1909):247–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 In 1669, for example, he attended meetings on January 7, 24, 26; February 11, 21, 28; March 21; April 4, 15, 18, 25; May 16, 30; June 19, 20, 22; July 4, 18, 25; August 1, 8, 29; September 26; October 10, 24, 31; November 7, 14, 21; December 19 (PRO Foreign Entry Book, State Papers, 104/176).

20 Hartmann, Cyril Hughes, Clifford of the Cabal (London, 1937), pp. 205, 211Google Scholar; Haley, K. H. D., The First Earl of Shaftesbury (Oxford, 1968), p. 292Google Scholar; Feiling, Keith, British Foreign Policy (1660–1672) (London, 1968), p. 315.Google Scholar

21 Geyl, Pieter, Orange and Stuart, trans. Pomerans, Arnold (New York, 1969), p. 323Google Scholar; Sir Charles Lyttelton to Christopher Hatton, October 20, 1670, The Correspondence of the Family of Hatton, ed. Thompson, Edward Maunde (New York, 1965), p. 59Google Scholar; Lindenov to King Christian V, October 28, 1670 (n.s.), Westergaard, p. 323; same to same, November 1, 1670 (n.s.), ibid., p. 325.

22 Hartmann, , Clifford, p. 205, 211Google Scholar; Haley, p. 292; Feiling, p. 315.

23 Feiling, p. 341; Hartmann, , Clifford, p. 233Google Scholar; Geyl, p. 339.

24 Francis Izod to Sir Charles Hatton, January 13, 1672, Hatton Correspondence, p. 75; William Griffith to Williamson, August 14, 1672, ibid., p. 488.

25 Although the Duke of York did not resign as Lord High Admiral until June, 1673, instructions issued by King Louis to his admiral, d'Estrées, mention Rupert as the Duke's successor on March 2/12, 1673, and by March 19 Rupert was already in charge. See, for example, Mr. Wachtendonk to Sir J. van Wachtendonk, June 7, 1672, CSPD 1672, p. 173.

26 Anderson, R. C., ed., Journals and Narratives of the Third Dutch War (London, 1946), p. 27.Google Scholar

27 Ibid., pp. 54-44; Robert Yard to Williamson, September 5, 1673, ed. Christie, W. D., Letters addressed from London to Sir Joseph Williamson while Plenipotentiary at the congress of Cologne in the Years 1673 and 1674, 2 vols. (New York, 1965), II:9Google Scholar; Henry Ball to same, ibid., 13; Burnet, Bishop Gilbert, History of His Own Time, 6 vols. (Oxford, 1833), II:15.Google Scholar

28 Henry Ball to Williamson, September 1, 1673, Williamson, II: 1–2Google Scholar; Robert Yard to same, September 5, 1673, ibid., 9-10.

29 Lockyer holds that it was the discovery of the secret clauses of the treaty of Dover which drove Shaftesbury into opposition, but the Lords Debates makes it clear that the earl was attacking Clifford by going into opposition (Lockyer, Roger, Tudor and Stuart Britain 1471-1714 [New York, 1964], p. 343Google Scholar; Lord's Debates, I:117–18Google Scholar).

30 Brown, Lucy Fargo, The First Earl of Shaftesbury (New York, 1933), pp. 208–9Google Scholar; Foxcroft, , Halifax, I:109.Google Scholar

31 Lord's Debates, I:117–18.Google Scholar

32 Haley, p. 334.

33 Henry Ball to Williamson, September 19, 1673, Williamson, II:21–22Google Scholar; Robert Yard to same, August 4, 1673, ibid., 143.

34 Colbert de Croissy to Louis XIV, September 11, 1673, PRO 31/3/129; Temple to Essex, September 10, 1673, Essex Papers, ed. Airy, Osmund, 2 vols. (New York, 1965), I:121, 121 n.b.Google Scholar

35 von Ranke, Leopold, A History of England Principally in the Seventeenth Century, 3 vols. (Oxford, 1875), III:547.Google Scholar

36 Klopp, Onno, Der Fall des Hauses Stuart, vols. I-IV (Vienna, 1876), II: 281–82Google Scholar; Ashley, Maurice, Charles II: The Man and the Statesman (New York, 1971), p. 187.Google Scholar

37 SirDering, Edward, The Parliamentary Diary of Sir Edward Dering, ed. Henning, B.D. (New Haven, 1940), p. 51Google Scholar; Ashley, pp. 187-89; Bryant, , ed., Charles II, pp. 270–71.Google Scholar

38 Colbert de Croissey to Louis XIV, P.S. of November 11 in a letter of November 10, 1673, Christie, W.D., A Life of Anthony Ashley Cooper, First Earl of Shaftesbury, 2 vols. (London, 1871), II:157.Google Scholar

39 Haley, p. 343.

40 Burnet, II:38-39.

41 Henry Ball to Williamson, December 18, 1673, Williamson, II:103.Google Scholar

42 Lockyer, pp. 344-45; Foxcroft, , Halifax, I:117.Google Scholar

43 Christie, , Shaftesbury, II:192.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., 199-200.

45 Waldstein to Leopold I, December 17, 1677 (n.s.), Klopp, II:83-84.

46 Foxcroft, , Halifax, II:117Google Scholar; Shaftesbury party circular 1674-75, Christie, , Shaftesbury, II:200.Google Scholar

47 Haley, p. 407.

48 Rupert to Sophie, October 26/November 5, 1679, Hanover 91, Kurfürstin Sophie, no. 15.

49 Stuart, James, Duke of York, “The Diary of the Duke of York,” Original Papers, ed. Macpherson, James (London, 1776), pp. 83–84.Google Scholar

50 Haley, p. 494.

51 Lacey, Douglas R., Dissent and Parliamentary Politics in England, 1661-1689 (New Brunswick, 1969), p. 135Google Scholar; Brown, , Shaftesbury, pp. 266–69Google Scholar. There were nine signers plus Rupert presenting the petition because the 1661 statute “Against Tumultuous Petitioning” permitted only twenty persons to sign a petition and ten to present it. Although Rupert had not been one of the seventeen signers, he was counted as being among the ten peers presenting it (Lacey, p. 324 n. 59).

52 Brown, , Shaftesbury, pp. 266–67.Google Scholar

53 Minutes of the Committee for Intelligence, BM Add. MS 15643.

54 Report of Nauvitz, January 19, 1680, Klopp, II:228; Foxcroft, , Halifax, II:131.Google Scholar

55 Report of Nauvitz, November 10, December 25, 1679, January 19, 1680 (n.s.), Klopp, II:228.

56 Waldstein report, June 22, 1680 (n.s.), ibid., 61.

57 Ibid., 119; Waldstein report, February 7, 1678, ibid., 90.

58 Ibid.

59 Lockyer, p. 348.

60 Report of Nauvitz, November 10, December 25, 1679, January 19, 1680 (n.s.), Klopp, II:228.

61 Journals of the House of Lords, XIII:745Google Scholar; Lockyer, pp. 351-52.

62 Sir William Temple to Sir John Temple, November 1677, SirTemple, William, The Works of Sir William Temple, 4 vols. (New York, 1968), IV:337Google Scholar; Turner, Edward Raymond, The Cabinet Council of England in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, 2 vols. (Baltimore, 1930), I:338Google Scholar; Waldstein to Leopold I, December 17, 1677 (n.s.), Klopp, II:83-84.

63 Rupert to Sophie, January 9/19, 1680, Hanover 91, Kurfürstin Sophie, no. 15; Henri, and van der Zee, Barbara, William and Mary (New York, 1973), p. 164.Google Scholar

64 Report of Nauvitz, January 19, 1680 (n.s.), Klopp, II:228.

65 Rupert to Sophie, undated letter of 1679, Hanover 61, Kurfürstin Sophie, no. 15.

66 Haley, p. 655; Brown, , Shaftesbury, p. 292.Google Scholar

67 Hauck, Karl, “Rupprecht der Kavalier,” Neujahrsblätter der Badischen Historischen Kommission, IX: 1–117.Google Scholar

68 Ibid.