Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T11:01:30.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Society for the Oversea Settlement of British Women and the Problems of Empire Settlement, 1917–1936

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Brian L. Blakeley
Get access

Extract

The “deluge” of World War I not only produced change within British society, but it intensified governmental and societal interest in the empire. This trend occurred for several reasons. Britain's wartime co-operation with her dominions led many Britons to assume that this new imperial unity could, and should, be cultivated in the post-war period. The imperial pessimism generated in some circles by the tragedy of the Boer War faded from the public's memory. Equally important, however, by 1917 the government was conscious of the serious economic and social problems Britain would confront once victory had been attained. One of several imperial solutions studied extensively during the war was state supported emigration. The government, which since 1914 had played an increasingly prominent role in solving society's problems, believed that emigration would serve a variety of useful purposes. It would alleviate the distress of thousands of British women, it would accelerate the economic and social development of the dominions, and it would strengthen the British Empire, giving it the power and self-assurance necessary to carry out its diplomatic and military roles in the post-war world. During the course of these deliberations during and immediately after World War I, the importance of women to any comprehensive strengthening of the empire was fully accepted by the government for the first time in British history.

The growth of interest in government sponsored imperial migration, including that of women, did not occur, however, in a vacuum. The 1920s and 1930s were, as it is increasingly recognized, “a great age of British Imperialism,” during which the “mass pheonomena of Empire—the Empire Shopping Weeks, the Empire Exhibitions and Empire Day celebrations” became a prominent part of the British social scene.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , Fall 1988 , pp. 421 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For general studies of the growth of interest in the strengthening of all facets of the empire see Holland, R. F., Britain and the Commonwealth Alliance, 1918–1939 (London, 1981), pp. 17–20, 109–14, and 127–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Drummond, Ian M., Imperial Economic Policy, 1917–1939 (London, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grierson, Edward, The Imperial Dream: The British Commonwealth and Empire, 1775–1969 (London, 1972), pp. 217–21Google Scholar; McIntyre, W. D., The Commonwealth of Nations: Origins and Impact, 1869–1971 (Minneapolis, 1977), pp. 318–28Google Scholar; Constantine, Stephen, The Making of British Colonial Development Policy, 1914–1940 (London, 1984), pp. 30–56Google Scholar; and MacKenzie, John M., Propaganda and Empire: The Manipulation of British Public Opinion, 1880–1960 (Manchester, 1984)Google Scholar.

2 McIntyre, , Commonwealth of Nations, p. 318Google Scholar; and Holland, , Britain and the Commonwealth Alliance, p. 1Google Scholar.

3 MacKenzie, , Propaganda and Empire, pp. 8–11Google Scholar.

4 For the ideas of Milner and Amery see Gollin, Alfred, Proconsul in Politics (New York, 1964), pp. 122–71, and 578–98Google Scholar; and Amery, L. S., My Political Life, 3 vols. (London, 1953), 2: 176–213, and 335–398Google Scholar.

5 Hitchens, Fred H., The Colonial Land and Emigration Commission (Philadelphia, 1931)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Malchow, Howard L., Population Pressures: Migration and Government in Late Nineteenth-Century Britain (Palo Alto, 1979)Google Scholar.

7 Blakeley, Brian L., The Colonial Office, 1868–1892 (Durham, N.C., 1972), pp. 110–15Google Scholar.

8 May, G. H. L. Le, British Supremacy in South Africa, 1899–1907 (Oxford, 1965), pp. 151–191Google Scholar; and Pyrah, G. B., Imperial Policy in South Africa, 1902–10 (Oxford, 1955), pp. 182–216Google Scholar.

9 Hammerton, A. J., Emigrant Gentlewomen: Genteel Poverty and Female Emigration, 1830–1914 (London, 1979)Google Scholar; and Monk, Una, New Horizons: A Hundred Years of Women's Emigration (London, 1963), pp. 1–24Google Scholar.

10 Blakeley, Brian L., “Women and Imperialism: The Colonial Office and Female Emigration to South Africa, 1901–1910,” Albion 13 (Summer 1981): 131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 The Imperial Colonist 12 (September 1914): 159Google Scholar; 12 (December 1914): 203; 13 (May 1915): 75–81; 15 (May 1917): 66–73; and 16 (April 1918): 50–57.

12 “Dominions Royal Commission. Final Report. March 1917,” Parliamentary Papers, 1917–1918, X, Cd. 8462, pp. 86–99Google Scholar.

13 The Imperial Colonist 13 (January 1915): 1Google Scholar.

14 Ibid., 15 (March 1917): 34.

15 Ibid., 15 (July 1917): 102.

16 On this development see Marwick, Arthur M., The Deluge: British Society and the First World War (New York, 1970), pp. 87–119Google Scholar, and Women at War, 1914–1918 (London, 1977)Google ScholarPubMed; and Braybon, Gail, Women Workers in the First World War (London, 1981)Google Scholar.

17 United Empire 8 (June 1917): 364–67Google Scholar.

18 The Imperial Cobnist 14 (March 1916): 32–34Google Scholar; 20 (March 1922): 35–37; and 20 (August 1922): 116–19; and United Empire 10 (July 1919): 322–26Google ScholarPubMed.

19 United Empire 10 (July 1919): 322–26Google ScholarPubMed.

20 United Empire 18 (July 1919): 325Google ScholarPubMed; and The Labour Woman 7 (March 1919): 28Google ScholarPubMed.

21 “Report to the Secretary of State for the Colonies of the Committee Appointed to Consider the Measures to be taken for the Settling Within the Empire Ex-Service Men who may desire to Emigrate after the War,” P. P., 1917, X, Cd. 8672, pp. 16–17.

22 Federation of British Industries to G. F. Plant, 7 February 1919, Plant's memo of 20 January 1919 on interview between Amery and George Apps; and W. A. Appleton to Plant, 13 January 1919, CO 721/1.

23 The Times, 12 June 1919, 7a; and Government Emigration Office, “Confidential Memos” of 30 December 1918 and February 1919, CO 721/1.

24 The Imperial Colonist 16 (January 1918): 3–5Google Scholar.

25 Transplantations: The Salvation Army Women's Migration Scheme, 1916–1923. Its Success and a Moral (London, 1923), pp. 4–5Google Scholar; and “Report on Settling Ex-Service Men,” pp. 16–17.

26 The Imperial Colonist 15 (February 1917): 20Google Scholar; and 15 (May 1917): 66; The Times, 22 November 1918, 9d; and Joint Council, minutes of 18 April 1917; and 18 June 1918, Fawcett Library 3.

27 Joint Council, minutes of 5 November 1918, Fawcett Library 3; “Report on Settling Ex-Service Men,” p. 25; Milner, , “Secret Memo on Emigration Policy for the War Cabinet,” February 1919, CO 721/1Google Scholar; and Plant, memo of 6 March 1919, CO 721/2.

28 Plant, memo of 17 January 1919; Talbot to MacNaghten, 23 January 1919; and P. W. Phillips to MacNaghten, 22 January 1919, CO 721/2.

29 Vernon to Lefroy, 9 December 1918, CO 721/1; and Talbot to MacNaghten, 23 January 1919, CO 721/2.

30 “Minutes of a Meeting of Representatives of Emigration Societies and other Organizations interested in the Emigration of Women,” 17 February 1919; and Caroline Grosvenor to MacNaghten, 26 February 1919, CO 721/2.

31 Plant, memo of 20 March 1919; and Londonderry to MacNaghten, 31 March 1919, CO 721/4.

32 Joint Council, minutes of 4 April 1919, Fawcett Library 3; and Cecil to MacNaghten, 11 April 1919; and Cecil to Amery, 11 April 1919, CO 721/4.

33 Departmental Committee on Emigration, minutes of 3 April 1919; MacNaghten to Cecil, 17 April 1919; and C. M. Wadge to MacNaghten, 2 May 1919, CO 721/4.

34 Londonderry to MacNaghten, 24 February 1919; and Furse to MacNaghten, 26 March 1919, CO 721/4.

35 “Minutes of a Meeting of Emigration Societies,” 17 February 1919, CO 721/1.

36 Plant, G. F., A Survey of Voluntary Effort in Women's Empire Migration (London, 1950), p. 137Google Scholar; and Talbot to MacNaghten, 24 February 1919, CO 721/1.

37 MacNaghten to Grosvenor, 24 February 1919, CO 721/1.

38 Herbert's minute of 7 February 1883, on E. T. Wakefield to CO, January 1883, CO 384/147.

39 Londonderry to MacNaghten, 1 March 1919; CO to Treasury, 5 March 1919; and Treasury to CO, 10 March 1919, CO 721/6.

40 L. E. Simms to Plant, 18 October 1919, CO 721/6.

41 MacNaghten, memo of February 1919; Devonshire to Milner, copy, 14 February 1919; and Agent General for Quebec to Plant, 14 April 1919, CO 721/6.

42 “Report to the President of the OSC of the Delegates Appointed to Enquire as to openings in Canada for Women from the United Kingdom, April–September, 1919,” P. P., 1919, XXI, Cmd. 403, pp. 4–26; “Report to the President of the OSC of the Delegates Appointed to Enquire as to openings in Australia for Women from the United Kingdom, June 1920,” P. P., 1920, XXII, Cmd. 745, pp. 3–24; and “Report to the President of the OSC of the Delegates Appointed to Enquire as to openings in New Zealand for Women from the United Kingdom, September 1920,” P. P., 1920, XXII, Cmd. 933, pp. 4–27.

43 The Times, 28 May 1919, 17b.

44 MacNaghten, memo of 2 May 1919, CO 721/4.

45 Plant to Joint Council, 8 May 1919; and Grosvenor to MacNaghten, 23 May 1919, CO 721/4; and Londonderry to MacNaghten, 26 May 1919, CO 721/1.

46 Joint Council to MacNaghten, 18 June 1919, CO 721/4; and SOSBW, minutes of 25 July 1919, Fawcett Library 3.

47 Plant, memo of 25 July 1919, CO 721/9; and “Minutes of the First Meeting of the Women's Advisory Committee,” 1 August 1919, CO 721/1.

48 Owen, David, English Philanthropy, 1660–1960 (Cambridge, Mass., 1964), pp. 527–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Joyce to MacNaghten, 28 May 1919, CO 721/4; Smith-Carrington to Dudley, 11 August 1919, CO 721/11; and Women's Advisory Committee, minutes of 14 November 1919; and Gladys Pott, memo of 29 October 1931, CO 721/1.

50 MacNaghten, memo of 21 November 1919; Furse to MacNaghten, 26 November 1919; MacNaghten to Dawson, private, 6 December 1919; Dawson to Plant, secret, 15 December 1919; and OSC, minutes of 16 December 1919, CO 721/11.

51 Plant, , Voluntary Effort in Women's Empire Migration, p. 137Google Scholar; Amery, , My Political Life, 2: 183Google Scholar; and MacNaghten to Cecil, 7 June 1919, CO 721/4.

52 SOSBW, minutes of 2 January and 16 January 1920, Fawcett Library 3; and OSC, minutes of 22 January 1920, CO 721/11. A further example of the new relationship was the OSC's insistence on appointing representatives to the SOSBW council while refusing to permit the president of the SOSBW, Lady Dudley, to sit on the OSC. Plant to Dudley, 20 December 1919, CO 721/11; and Wadge to MacNaghten, 29 January 1920, CO 721/22.

53 The Imperial Colonist 19 (February 1921): 22Google Scholar.

54 Harrison, Brian, Separate Spheres, The Opposition to Women's Suffrage in Britain (London, 1978), pp. 113, 131Google Scholar.

55 Brog, memo of 1919, CO 721/9; and The Times, 14 November 1961, 15b.

56 United Empire 23 (August 1932): 427–28Google ScholarPubMed; Empire Economic Union, Further Considerations on Economic Policy with Particular Reference to Migration (London, 1938), pp. 9–33Google Scholar; The Empire Annual, 1930, pp. 27–28; Plant's minute of 13 September 1935, on British Empire League to OSD, 20 November 1928, DO 57/79; and British Imperial Frontier Man 2 (1 August 1930): 87–89Google Scholar.

57 Plant, G. F., Oversea Settlement: Migration from the United Kingdom to the Dominions (London, 1951), pp. 69–72Google Scholar.

58 For examples of the appreciation of the government's new role in migration see Royal Empire Society, The Crucial Problem of Imperial Development (London: 1938)Google ScholarPubMed; Gregory, J. W., Human Migration and the Future: A Study of the Causes, Effects, and Control of Emigration (London, 1928)Google Scholar; Belcher, E. A. and Williamson, James A., Migration within the Empire (London, 1924), pp. xiii–xiv, and 147–48Google Scholar; and MacNaghten, T. C., et al., Empire Opportunities: A Survey of the Possibilities of Oversea Settlement (London, 1938), pp. 5–21Google Scholar.

59 Plant, , Voluntary Effort in Women's Empire Migration, pp. 136–37Google Scholar.

60 For obituaries and descriptions of their work see The Imperial Colonist 11 (November 1913): 177–83; 12 (March 1914): 39Google Scholar; 13 (June 1915): 94–95; 17 (April 1919): 50–54; 18 (April 1920): 54–57; 21 (July 1923): 97–98; 22 (June 1924): 101–02; and 22 (July 1924): 130–33; and Phillimore, Mary Catherine, In Memoriam: Louisa Evelyn Denison (London, 1919)Google Scholar.

61 Women who had “served in one of the recognized service corps” could apply for a free passage for themselves and their dependents up to a year after discharge. 5 Hansard 114(8 April 1919): 1857; and The Imperial Colonist 19 (February 1921): 23Google Scholar.

62 Plant to Joint Council, 8 May 1919; and Plant's minute of 27 May 1919, on Grosvenor to MacNaghten, 23 May 1919, CO 721/4.

63 “Arrangement between the SOSBW and Canadian Authorities,” 1 April 1920, CO 721/22.

64 Plant, , Oversea Settlement, pp. 73–74Google Scholar.

65 “Report of the OSC for the Year ended 31st December 1922,” P. P., 1923, XII(2), Cmd. 1804, pp. 13–14Google Scholar.

66 “Report of the OSC for the Year ended31st December 1921,” P. P., 1922, X, Cmd. 1580, p. 11Google Scholar.

67 “Conference of Prime Ministers and Representatives of the United Kingdom, the Dominions, and India, held in June, July, and August, 1921,” P. P., 1921, XIV, Cmd. 1474, p. 59; and MacNaghten, , Empire Opportunities, pp. 7–9Google Scholar.

68 The total annual expenditure was not to exceed £3 million. Amery, , My Political Life, 2: 206–10Google Scholar; and 5 Hansard 153 (26 April 1922): 575–656.

69 5 Hansard 174 (28 May 1924): 528–72.

70 “Imperial Conference, 1926. Summary of Proceedings,” P. P., 1926, XI, Cmd. 2768, pp. 44–45.

71 5 Hansard 240 (26 June 1930): 1392; and Amery, , My Political Life, 2: 208–09Google Scholar.

72 “Report of the OSC, May 1938,” P. P., 1937–38, XIV, Cmd. 5766, p. 7. The figures for selected years are 1913:285,046; 1920: 198,594; 1923: 157,062; 1926: 132,306; 1929: 106,900; and 1932: 21,249.

73 “Report of the OSC for the Year ending 31st December 1928,” P. P., 1928–29, VIII, Cmd. 3308, p. 20.

74 “Report of the OSC for the Year ending 31st December 1929,” P. P., 1929–30, XVI, Cmd. 3589, p. 20; and “Report of the OSC for the Period 1 January 1930 to 31 March 1931,” P. P., 1930–31, XVI, Cmd. 3887, p. 19.

75 Cmd. 2107, pp. 11–12. The Imperial Conference of 1926 also saw the “ideal” migration as family migration. Cmd. 2768, p. 44.

76 Pughe to Crawley, 13 May 1921, enclosed in Pott in MacNaghten, 29 May 1921, CO 721/37.

77 GFS, minutes of the Emigration Department, 5 March 1920, Reference 45. See also Pott to MacNaghten, 9 April 1920, CO 721/22. The YWCA also withdrew its support.

78 Lamb to Plant, 1 April 1920, CO 721/22; MacNaghten's memo of 28 April 1921, CO 721/30; and The Times, 22 November 1918, 11c.

79 OSCtoCO, 12 November 1921, CO 721/32. In 1927 the SOSBW again almost lost its subsidy for similar reasons. DO 57/71, File 0413.

80 OSC, minutes of 11 October 1920, CO 721/37; CO to Treasury, 10 July 1922, CO 721/47; and “Memorandum on Shipping Commissions,” 14 June 1922, CO 721/58.

81 The Liberal Woman's News 40 (January 1925): 3Google Scholar; The Labour Woman 12 (June 1924): 97–98Google ScholarPubMed; and 5 Hansard 197 (28 June 1926): 791; 208 (27 June 1927): 7–10; and 219 (25 June 1928): 16.

82 Martin, E. C., ed., Imperial Studies in Education: Papers Read at the Imperial Conference at Wembley (London, 1924), pp. iii–iv, 56–85, and 146–48Google Scholar; minutes on Crozier [Empire Day Medal Association] to Amery, 19 June 1926, DO 35/20; and Power, Eileen, ed., A Bibliography for Teachers of History (London, 1919), pp. 14, 41, and 47Google Scholar.

83 5 Hansard 126 (8 March 1920): 1011–36.

84 Gupta, Partha Sarathi, Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964 (New York, 1975), pp. 86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 The Anti-Suffrage Review 40 (March 1912): 53Google ScholarPubMed.

86 The Workers' Dreadnought 5 (15 March 1919): 1257Google Scholar.

87 The Workers' Dreadnought 4–8 (1918–1921)Google Scholar; The Vote 27 (25 June 1926): 205–06Google ScholarPubMed; 27 (23 July 1926): 231; and 27 (8 October 1926): 317–18; The International Woman Suffrage News 17 (January 1923): 58Google Scholar; and 25 (June 1931): 134; and The Shield 3 (1922).

88 The Woman Worker: A Journal for Women Trade Unionists 54 (August–September 1920): 15Google Scholar.

89 The Labour Woman 7 (March 1919): 28Google Scholar; 10 (April 1922): 64; and 13 (June 1925): 95.

90 The Times, 14 May 1924, 15d.

91 “Migration to Canada,” n.d., DO 57/104.

92 Ibid.; and Plant, , Oversea Settlement, pp. 151–52Google Scholar.

93 Minutes on Canadian Council on Child Welfare to Plant, 1 February 1926, DO 57/22; Pott's minute of 19 April 1926, DO 57/28; minutes of the SOSBW Conference with Imperial Press Delegates, 2 February 1926, DO 57/28; and Pott's minute of 2 July 1927, DO 57/29.

94 Minutes on Lamb to rorke, 20 July 1927, DO 57/59.

95 For a good view of the debate in the 1920s over the domestic servant crisis see Firth, Violet M., The Psychology of the Servant Problem: A Study in Social Relationships (London, 1925), pp. 11–48Google Scholar. The diversity of criticism over the emigration of domestic servants is reflected in The Workers' Dreadnought 5 (15 March 1919): 1257Google Scholar; Crutchley's brief for Lord Lovat, n.d., DO 57/71; The Labour Woman 7 (February 1919): 15Google ScholarPubMed; and 7 (March 1919): 26; The Vote 27 (25 June 1926): 205; and National Council of Women News 135 (June 1925): 164–66Google Scholar; and 156 (October 1927): 320–23.

96 The Times, 29 July 1927, 13e.

97 Minutes of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Social Insurance Schemes and Migration, 10 November 1925, CO 721/111; and minutes of the Oversea Settlement Sub-Committee of the Imperial Conference, 1926, CO 57/18.

98 Man in the Street 45 (February 1928): 303Google Scholar; and 49 (June 1928): 15.

99 NCW News 148 (November 1926): 303Google Scholar; and 165 (October 1928): 259.

100 OSD memo of 26 June 1929, DO 57/113; Pott's memo of 27 June 1929, DO 57/112; and The Times, 24 November 1927, 15e.

101 SOSBW, “Migration of Women: Suggestions for Future Policy,“ 1932, Fawcett Library 7Google Scholar.

102 Minute of 1927 on SOSBW, CO 57/71.

103 Minutes of the Oversea Settlement Sub-Committee of the Imperial Conference, 28 October 1926, 4 November 1926, and 10 November 1926. An OSC pamphlet, Training of Girls in Household Work for Australia, describes the project. DO 57/11.

104 Pott's minute of 25 March 1929; Pott's memo of 24 January 1934; and Grosvenor to Plant, 12 April 1934, DO 57/112.

105 MacNaghten's minute of 7 December 1926, on minutes of the RCI committee on migration, DO 57/28.

106 Minutes on Pott's memo of 25 July 1929, DO 57/113.

107 Pott's memo of 25 June 1929, DO 57/113.

108 SOSBW, Executive Committee minutes, 14 October 1931, Fawcett Library 6.

109 “Imperial Conference, 1930. Summary of Proceedings. November 1930,” P. P., 1930–31, XIV, Cmd. 3717, pp. 61–62; and “Imperial Conference, 1937. Summary of Proceedings,” P. P., 1936–37, XII, Cmd. 5482, pp. 1–71.

110 “Economic Advisory Council. Committee on Empire Migration Report. May 1932,” P. P., 1931–32, IX, Cmd. 4075, pp. 2–53; and “Report to the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Migration Policy,” P. P., 1933–34, X, Cmd. 4689, pp. 5–74.

111 “Report of the OSB. May 1938,” P. P., 1937–38, XIV, Cmd. 5766.

112 MacNaghten, , Empire Opportunities, pp. 20–22Google Scholar.

113 Plant, , Voluntary Effort in Women's Empire Migration, p. 139Google Scholar; Pott's minute of 29 July 1926, DO 57/29; and Pott's minute of 7 December 1926, on Board of Trade to OSD, 11 October 1926, DO 57/21.

114 Pott's memo of 24 July 1928, DO 57/95; Pott's minute of 19 January 1929, DO 57/102; and Pott's memo of 25 June 1929, DO 57/113.

115 “Minutes of an Informal Conference with Representatives of Voluntary Societies,” 6 May 1927, DO 57/59; and SOSBW, council minutes, 21 March 1928, Fawcett Library 5; and 14 October 1931, Fawcett Library 7.

116 SOSBW, Council minutes, 14 October 1931, Fawcett Library 7.

117 SOSBW, “Memorandum of Migration of Women,” 13 January 1932, Fawcett Library 7Google Scholar.

118 The Oversea Settler 1 (June 1926): 8Google Scholar; 3 (June 1928): 55–56; 4 (July 1929): 73–74; 5 (June 1930): 55–57; and 6 (June 1931): 54–55.

119 SOSBW, Seventeenth Annual Report, 1936, pp. 4–11Google Scholar; and Twentieth Annual Report, 1939, pp. 1, 8.

120 The Oversea Settler 2 (June 1927): 11Google Scholar; and 5 (June 1930): 55–57.

121 SOSBW, Seventeenth Annual Report, 1936, pp. 4–9Google Scholar.

122 SOSBW, Executive Committee minutes, 21 June 1961, Fawcett Library 13.

123 SOSBW, council minutes, 21 October 1936, Fawcett Library 7.