Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T02:44:24.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Open Elites: Recruitment to the French Noblesse and the English Aristocracy in the Eighteenth Century*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

Michael W. McCahill
Get access

Extract

Over the past fifteen years historians of Britain have debated the degree to which the nation's aristocracy was open to newcomers. First, W. D. Rubinstein suggested that the new rich of the nineteenth century broke with the pattern of centuries and refrained from large-scale land purchases, in part because the established aristocracy had assumed a more “caste-like” mentality that held outsiders at bay. Then in 1984 two important works extended the challenge to earlier centuries. John Cannon demonstrated that throughout the eighteenth century recruits to the peerage were chosen from among the upper reaches of the landed aristocracy, a fact that suggested to him that the British nobility was a closed group, more closed than its continental counterparts. More significantly, Lawrence and Jeanne Stone completed an immense study of the elite of three counties over a 340-year period; they concluded that the proportion of newcomers was small and that new recruits were drawn mainly from groups already affiliated with the aristocracy. It was not businessmen but small gentry, office holders, and members of the professions who dominated the ranks of newcomers to their county elites.

Other leading students of the British aristocracy of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries have taken exception to the claims of these iconoclasts. Sir John Habakkuk concluded in his Ford Lectures that “there was no weakening among new men in the eighteenth century of the desire to acquire landed estates. Almost all the wealthiest (or their descendants in the next generation) joined the landed elite….” In greater detail F. M. L. Thompson called into question Rubinstein's findings by challenging the usefulness of his probate data and by showing that millionaire Victorian businessmen or their direct heirs made substantial land purchases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Albion , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Winter 1998 , pp. 599 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Richard Davis, Grayson Ditchfield, Michael Kwass, Standish Meacham, and Ellis Wasson for their comments on earlier drafts of this article, which I began a number of years ago as the result of an independent study grant from the Council for Basic Education and the National Endowment for the Humanities.

References

1 Rubinstein, W. D., Men of property: the very wealthy in Britain since the Industrial Revolution (New Brunswick, 1981), pp. 218–19Google Scholar; Cannon, John, Aristocratic century: the peerage of eighteenth-century England (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 8–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lawrence, and Stone, Jeanne Fawtier, An Open Elite? England, 1540–1800 (Oxford, 1984), pp. 402–04Google Scholar.

2 Despite the fact that the Stones emphasized differences between the French and English elites, Jonathan Clark welcomed their work because it bolstered his notion of the British aristocracy's relative exclusiveness and on-going cultural hegemony. Clark, J. C. D., English Society, 1688-1832: Ideology, Social Structure, and Political Practice during the Ancien Regime (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 95, 421–22Google Scholar; Stones, , An Open Elite?, pp. 407–08Google Scholar. For other advocates of the view that the aristocracy was relatively closed to newcomers, see Royle, Edward, Modern Britain: A Social History, 1750-1985 (London, 1987), pp. 80–81Google Scholar; Harling, Philip and Mandler, Peter, “From the ‘Fiscal Military’ State to the Laissez-faire State, 1760-1850,” Journal of British Studies (JBS) 32 (01 1993); 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jones, Colin, “Bourgeois revolution revivified: 1789 and social change,” in Rewriting the French Revolution, ed. Lucas, Colin (Oxford, 1991), pp. 73–74Google Scholar.

3 SirHabakkuk, John, Marriage, debt and the estates system: English Landownership 1650-1950 (Oxford, 1994), p. 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thompson, F. M. L., “Life after death: how successful nineteenth-century businessmen disposed of their fortunes,” Economic History Review (EcHK) 43 (02 1990): 40–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Desirable properties: the town and connections in British society since the late 18th century,” Historical Research 64 (June 1991): 156-71; idem, “Stitching it together again,” EcHR 45 (May 1992): 362-75; David, and Spring, Eileen, “The English Landed Elite, 1540-1879: A Review,” Albion 17 (Summer 1985): 149–66Google Scholar; idem, “Social Mobility and the English Landed Elite,” Canadian Journal of History 21 (December 1986): 333-51; Perkin, Harold, “An Open Elite,” JBS 24 (10 1985): 496–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 English, Barbara, The great landowners of East Yorkshire, 1530-1910 (New York, 1990), pp. 52–53Google Scholar; Clay, Christopher, “Henry Hoare, banker, his family and the Stourhead estate,” in Landowners, capitalists, and entrepreneurs: essays for Sir John Habakkuk, ed. Thompson, F. M. L. (Oxford, 1994), p. 113Google Scholar; Wasson, E. A., “The penetration of new wealth into the English governing class from the middle ages to the First World War,” EcHR 51 (02 1998): 25–48Google Scholar.

5 Stone, Lawrence, “Spring Back,” Albion 17 (Summer 1985): 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Bush takes Cannon to task for failing to apply this standard in his review of Aristocratic century in Albion 17 (Fall 1985): 332–34Google Scholar. For the problems of equating aristocracy exclusively with the peerage, see Phillips, John, “Peers and Parliamentarians versus Jacobites and Jacobins: Eighteenth-Century Stability?,” JBS 25 (10 1986): 506–07Google Scholar and Beckett, J. V., “The English Aristocracy,” Parliamentary History 5 (1986): 135–36Google Scholar.

7 Cannon, , Aristocratic century, pp. 8–28Google Scholar. For recent discussions regarding the size of the French nobility see Swann, Julian, “The French Nobility, 1715-1789,” in The European Nobilities in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, ed. Scott, H. M., 2 vols. (London and New York, 1995), 1: 143–44Google Scholar and Doyle, William, Venality: the sale of offices in eighteenth-century France (Oxford, 1996), pp. 163–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 For a discussion of noble privileges, see Bush, M. L., Noble Privilege (Manchester, 1983)Google Scholar.

9 Beckett, J. V., The aristocracy in England, 1660-1914 (New York, 1986), p. 41Google Scholar.

10 Sugarman, David and Warrington, Ronnie, “Land law, citizenship, and the invention of ‘Englishness.’ The strange world of the equity of redemption,” in Early modern conceptions of property, ed. Brewer, John and Staves, Susan (London, 1995), pp. 111–43Google Scholar.

11 Thompson, F. M. L., English landed society in the nineteenth century (London, 1963), pp. 111–12Google Scholar; Bateman, John, The Great Landowners of Great Britain and Ireland, with an introduction by Spring, David (Leicester, 1971), pp. 501, 512Google Scholar. R. J. Olney argues that an estate of 1,000 acres was sufficient to support gentle status in early nineteenth-century Lincolnshire. Rural society and county government in nineteenth-century Lincolnshire (Lincoln, 1979), p. 26Google Scholar.

12 Mingay, G. E., The gentry: the rise and fall of a ruling class (London and New York, 1976), p. 4Google Scholar.

13 Thompson, , English landed society, p. 20Google Scholar; Bush, M. L., The English aristocracy: a comparative synthesis (Manchester, 1984), pp. 2–5Google Scholar; Rule, John, Albion's people: English society, 1714-1815 (London and New York, 1992), pp. 31-33, 51Google Scholar; Speck, W. A., Stability and strife: England, 1714-1760 (Cambridge, Mass., 1977), pp. 33–40Google Scholar.

14 For the prominence of impoverished nobility in France and other continental countries, see Bush, M. L., Rich noble, poor noble (Manchester, 1988)Google Scholar.

15 Jenkins, Philip, The making of a ruling class: the Glamorgan gentry, 1640-1790 (Cambridge, 1982), p. 51Google Scholar.

16 Doyle, William, Origins of the French Revolution (New York, 1988), p. 124Google Scholar. Robert Forster assumes in his calculations that there were approximately 20 livres to the pound in The house of Saulx-Tavanes (Baltimore, 1971), p. 104Google Scholar. Other estimates are as high as 25. Bien, David, “Aristocracy,” in A critical dictionary of the French Revolution, ed. Furet, F. and Ozouf, M., trans. Goldhammer, Arthur (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), p. 620Google Scholar.

17 Meyer, Jean, La Noblesse bretonne au XVIIIe siècle, 2 vols. (Paris, 1966), 2: 1245–46Google Scholar.

18 To establish themselves as nobles by usurpation, families had to purchase lands and seigneuries, exempt themselves from the taille by acquiring a local office that carried with it this privilege and perhaps add the particule. Over time neighbors and local institutions accorded them noble status. Social ascent of this sort became more difficult in the eighteenth century, in part as a result of Louis XIV's inquests, in part because local noblemen jealously guarded access to their order. Still, 13.4% of the noble members of the cour des comptes at Aix in the eighteenth century owed their status to usurpation. Behrens, C. B. A., Society, Government and the Enlightenment: the experiences of eighteenth-century France and Prussia (New York, 1985), p. 50Google Scholar; Goubert, Pierre, The ancien régime, trans. Cox, Steve (New York, 1974), pp. 185–86Google ScholarPubMed. Cubells, M., “Le recrutement de la Cour des comptes, aides et finances de Provence au XVIIIe siècle,” Revue historique 521 (01-March 1977): 17Google Scholar.

19 Goubert, , Ancien régime, pp. 180–81Google ScholarPubMed; Mousnier, Roland, The institutions of France under the absolute monarchy, 1598-1789, trans. Pearce, Brian, 2 vols. (Chicago, 1979), 1: 127–28Google Scholar.

20 Chaussinand-Nogaret, Guy, The French nobility in the eighteenth century, trans. Doyle, William (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reinhard, Marcel, “Elite et noblesse dans la seconde moitié du XVIIIe siècle,” Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine 3 (1956): 5–37Google Scholar.

21 For the importance of money as a criteria for achieving noble rank, see McManners, J., “France,” in The European nobility in the eighteenth century, ed. Goodwin, Albert (New York, 1967), p. 26Google Scholar. See also, Giesey, Ralph, “Rules of inheritance and strategies of mobility in pre-revolutionary France,” American Historical Review 82 (04 1977): 271–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Mousnier, , Institutions, 1: 221–27Google Scholar; 2: 28-57. Doyle, William, “The Price of Offices in Pre-Revolutionary France,” Historical Journal 27 (12 1984): 831–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Bluche, François, Les magistrats du Parlement de Paris au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1986), p. 31Google Scholar; Brelot, Claude, La noblesse en Franche-Comté de 1789 à 1808 (Paris, 1972), pp. 23–25Google Scholar; Mousnier, , Institutions, 2: 324–25Google Scholar; Meyer, Jean, “La Noblesse française au XVIIIe siècle: aperçu des problèmes,” Acta Poloniae Historica 36 (1977): 11Google Scholar.

23 Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, pp. 27Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., pp. 27-28; Mousnier, , Institutions, 1: 130–31Google Scholar.

25 Bien, David, “La réaction aristocratique avant 1789: l'exemple de l'armée,” Annales E.S.C. 29 (03-April 1974): 506–07Google Scholar.

26 Bien, , “Manufacturing Nobles: The Chancelleries in France to 1789,” Journal of Modern History (JMH) 61 (09 1989): 448, 453–77Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, p. 27Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., pp. 27-28; Meyer, , “La noblesse française,” pp. 8–17Google Scholar; Doyle, William, The Oxford history of the French Revolution (Oxford, 1989), p. 26Google Scholar; idem, Venality, pp. 163-65.

28 Meyer, , La Noblesse bretonne, 1: 427–28Google Scholar; Favre-Lejeune, Christine, Les secrétaires du roi de la Grande Chancellerie: dictionnaire biographique et généalogique (1672-1789), introduction by Furet, François and Chaussinand-Nogaret, Guy, 2 vols. (Paris, 1986), 1: 63–64Google Scholar; Bien, , “Aristocracy,” in Critical dictionary, p. 622Google Scholar.

29 Ibid., p. 617; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, pp. 28–30Google Scholar; Swann, , “French nobility,” pp. 143–44Google Scholar; Meyer, , “La noblesse française,” pp. 22–27Google Scholar; Dauvergne, R., “Le Problème du nombre des nobles en France au XVIIIe siècle,” in Sur la population française au XVIIIe et XIXe siécles (Paris, 1973), pp. 181–92Google Scholar; Doyle, , Venality, p. 166Google Scholar; Sutherland, D. M. G., France 1789-1815: revolution and counter-revolution (New York, 1986), p. 17Google Scholar.

30 Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, p. 1Google Scholar; Doyle, , Origins of the French revolution, p. 130Google Scholar. Cf. Barber, Elinor, The bourgeoisie in 18th-century France (Princeton, 1955) pp. 55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Quoted in Lucas, Colin, “Nobles, Bourgeois and the Origins of the French Revolution,” Past and Present 60 (08 1973): 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, pp. 35–36Google Scholar; Cubells, , “Le recrutement,” pp. 17–25Google Scholar; Doyle, William, The Parlement of Bordeaux and the end of the old regime, 1771-1790 (New York, 1974), pp. 12–14Google Scholar; Bluche, , Les magistrats, p. 51Google Scholar; Solnon, Jean-François, 215 bourgeois gentilhommes au XVIIIe siècle: les secretaires du roi à Besançon (Paris, 1980), pp. 128–29Google Scholar; Favre-Lejeune, , Les secrétaires du roi, 1: 74–75Google Scholar.

33 Doyle, , The Parlement of Bordeaux, pp. 14–15Google Scholar; Bluche, , Les magistrals, pp. 51–52Google Scholar.

34 Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, p. 31Google Scholar; Favre-Lejeune, , Les secrétaires du roi, 1: 74–75Google Scholar; Durand, Yves, Les fermiers géneraux au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1971), pp. 299–300Google Scholar; Meyer, , La Noblesse bretonne, 1: 245–52Google Scholar; Solnon, , 215 bourgeois gentilhommes, pp. 130–36Google Scholar.

35 Mousnier, , Institutions, 1: 230–31Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, p. 36Google Scholar; Stein, R. L., The French Slave Trade in the Eighteenth Century: an Old Regime Business (Madison, Wisconsin, 1979), pp. 190–91Google Scholar.

36 Richard, Guy, Noblesse d'affaires au XVIIIe siècle (Paris, 1974), pp. 154, 164, 213, 217, 222Google Scholar; Mousnier, , Institutions, 1: 227-29, 231–32Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, p. 36Google Scholar.

37 Giesey, , “Rules of Inheritance,” pp. 285–88Google Scholar; Solnon, , 215 bourgeois gentilhommes, pp. 135–36Google Scholar.

38 Forster, Robert, The nobility of Toulouse in the eighteenth century: a social and economic study (New York, 1960), p. 25Google Scholar; Durand, , Les fermiers généraux, pp. 247-48, 295–99Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, pp. 32–33Google Scholar.

39 Meyer, , La Noblesse bretonne, 1: 254–55Google Scholar; Le Goff, T. J. A., Vannes and its region: a study of town and country in eighteenth-century France (Oxford, 1981), pp. 73–77Google Scholar; Forster, , The Deponts, pp. 13–89Google Scholar.

40 Cubells, , “Le recrutement,” pp. 7-13, 19Google Scholar; Solnon, , 215 bourgeois gentilhommes, pp. 162-65, 249–52Google Scholar; Gruder, Vivian, The royal provincial intendants; a governing elite in eighteenth-century France (Ithaca, N.Y., 1968), pp. 97–116Google Scholar.

41 Solnon, , 215 bourgeois gentilhommes, p. 130Google Scholar; Doyle, , “Price of Offices,” pp. 842–44Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , “Capital et structure sociale sous l'Ancien Régime,” Annales E.S.C. 25 (03-April 1970): 470–73Google Scholar.

42 Meyer, , La Noblesse bretonne, 1: 255Google Scholar; 2: 1044; Stein, , French slave trade, pp. 190–93Google ScholarPubMed; Bien, , “Manufacturing Nobles,” pp. 483–84Google Scholar.

43 For a summary of some traditional justifications for nobility, see Mousnier, , Institutions, 1: 4–36Google Scholar.

44 Bien, , “Aristocracy,” in Critical dictionary, pp. 623–25Google Scholar; idem, “Manufacturing Nobles,” p. 484; Mousnier, , Institutions, 2: 328–32Google Scholar. Stone, Bailey, “Robe against Sword: The Parlement of Paris and the French Aristocracy, 1774-1789,” French Historical Studies 9 (Fall 1975): 278–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Forster, , Deponts, pp. 41–42Google Scholar.

45 Ellis, Harold A., “Genealogy, History and Aristocratic Reaction in Early Eighteenth-Century France: The Case of Henri de Boulanvilliers,” JMH 58 (06 1986): 414–51Google Scholar.

46 Bien, , “Manufacturing Nobles,” p. 485Google Scholar.

47 For the factors leading to the enactment of the Ségur Ordinance, see Bien, David, “The Army in the French Enlightenment: Reform, Reaction and Revolution,” Past & Present 85 (1979): 68–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Bush, , Rich noble, poor noble, p. 120Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French nobility, pp. 52–64Google Scholar; Forster, , Saulx-Tavanes, pp. 55–57Google Scholar; Brelot, , La noblesse en Franche-Comté, pp. 21–22Google Scholar; Meyer, , La Noblesse bretonne, 2: 863–911Google Scholar.

49 Motley, Mark, Becoming a French aristocrat: the education of the court nobility, 1580-1715 (Princeton, 1990), pp. 6–11Google Scholar.

50 Darnton, Robert, The business of the enlightenment: publishing history of the Encyclopédie, 1775-1800 (Cambridge, Mass., 1979), p. 290Google Scholar; Bluche, , Les magistrals, pp. 279–83Google Scholar; Forster, , Deponts, p. 35Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, French nobility, ch. 4. See also Doyle, , Origins of the French Revolution, pp. 125–26Google Scholar.

51 Reinhard, , “Elite et noblesse,” pp. 5–37Google Scholar; Chaussinand-Nogaret, , French Nobility, pp. 34–42Google Scholar; Doyle, , Origins of the French revolution, pp. 207–10Google Scholar; Stone, Bailey, The genesis of the French Revolution: global-historical interpretation (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Thompson, F. M. L., “The social distribution of landed property in England since the sixteenth century,” EcHR 19 (12 1966): 505–17Google Scholar; Clay, Christopher, “Landlords and Estate Management in England,” in The Agrarian history of England and Wales. Vol.5: 1640-1750. Agrarian Change, ed. Thirsk, Joan (Cambridge, 1985), 5: 162-64, 175Google Scholar; Beckett, , English aristocracy, p. 87Google Scholar.

53 Cannon briefly summarizes the debate provoked by H. J. Habakkuk's initial explanation for the consolidation of landed property in Aristocratic century, pp. 132-36. See also, Clay, C., “Property Settlements, Financial Provision for Families and Sale of Land by the Greater Landowners, 1660-1790,” JBS 21 (Fall 1981): 18–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holderness, B. A., “The English land market in the eighteenth century: the case of Lincolnshire,” EcHR 27 (11 1974): 557–76Google Scholar; J. V. Beckett, “English landownership in the later seventeenth and eighteenth centuries: the debate and the problems,” ibid. 30 (November 1977): 573-78.

54 Beckett, , English aristocracy, pp. 66-7, 80Google Scholar; Clay, , “Henry Hoare,” pp. 116–35Google Scholar; Mathias, Peter, The brewing industry in England (Cambridge, 1959), pp. 287, 308, 320–21Google Scholar; Jones, E. L., “Industrial capital and landed investment: the Arkwrights in Herefordshire, 1809-1843,” in Agriculture and the industrial revolution (New York 1974), pp. 165–70Google Scholar.

55 Beckett, , English aristocracy, pp. 68-90, 128–31Google Scholar; Mingay, G. E., English landed society in the eighteenth century (London, 1963), pp. 26-28, 47Google Scholar; English, , Great landowners, pp. 56–62Google Scholar.

56 Beckett, , English aristocracy, pp. 82–84Google Scholar; Clay, , “Landlords and Estate Management,” p. 183Google Scholar; Stones, , An Open Elite?, p. 15Google Scholar. Habakkuk examines the motives for purchasing land in Marriage, debt, pp. 403-12. In addition to land's other economic advantages, the burden of the land tax on estates diminished as the century progressed. Brewer, John, The sinews of power: war, money and the English state, 1688-1783 (Cambridge, Mass. 1988), pp. 203–04Google Scholar.

57 Cannon, , Aristocratic century, pp. 1–33Google Scholar; Jones, Clyve, “‘Venice Preserv'd; or a Plot Discover'd: The Political and Social Context of the Peerage Bill of 1719,” in A Pillar of the constitution: the House of Lords in British politics, 1640-1784 (London, 1986), pp. 105–08Google Scholar; McCahill, , “Peerage creations and the changing character of the British nobility, 1750-1830,” English Historical Review 96 (04 1981): 259–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Stones, , An Open Elite?, pp. 50–53Google Scholar.

59 Ibid., Table 6.2.

60 Ibid., pp. 402-04.

61 D., and Spring, E., “The English landed elite,” pp. 150–56Google Scholar; idem, “Social Mobility,” pp. 338-44.

62 Perkin, , “An Open Elite,” pp. 498–99Google Scholar.

63 Stones, , An Open Elite?, pp. 181–89Google Scholar.

64 D., and Spring, E., “The English landed elite,” p. 152Google Scholar.

65 Jenkins, , Making of a ruling class, pp. 38–42Google Scholar; Perkin, Harold, “An Open Elite,” p. 500Google Scholar; English, Great landowners, p. 53.

66 Thompson, , Landed Society, p. 124Google Scholar.

67 See above, pp. 607-608.

68 Stones, , An Open Elite?, pp. 197-206, 221-25, 280, 402–03Google Scholar. It is also worth noting that a number of Frenchmen who held ennobling offices sold those posts before they achieved hereditary nobility. Bossenga, Gail, “From Corps to Citizenship: the Bureau des Finances before the French Revolution,” JMH 58 (09 1986): 617Google Scholar.

69 Stones, , An Open Elite?, pp. 208–10Google Scholar and Table 7.3. For the impact of income from office and business on the small and mid-sized landowners, see Brent, Judith, “The Pooles of Charley and Lewes: The Establishment and Influence of a Gentry Family, 1732-1779,” Sussex Archaeological Collections 114 (1976): 69–80Google Scholar; Keeley, P.J., “Devon family and their estates: the Northcotes of Upton Pyne, 1660-1851,” in Town and countryside: the English landowner in the national economy, 1660-1860, ed. Chalkin, C. W. and Wordie, J. R. (London, 1989), pp. 180–87Google Scholar.

70 Beckett, , English aristocracy, pp. 70–79Google Scholar; Holderness, , “The English land market,” p. 560Google Scholar.

71 Wilson, R. G., Gentlemen merchants: the merchant community in Leeds, 1700-1830 (Manchester, 1971), pp. 2, 220–30Google Scholar; Koditschek, Theodore, Class formation and urban-industrial society: Bradford, 1750-1850 (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 139–41Google Scholar.

72 Beckett, J. V., Coal and tobacco: the Lowthers and the economic development of West Cumberland, 1660-1760 (Cambridge, 1981), p. 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, Gordon, Hull in the eighteenth century (London, 1972), pp. 112-15, 264–65Google Scholar.

73 Wasson, , “Penetration of new wealth,” pp. 27, 33, 36Google Scholar. Cf. Christie, Ian, British “non-elite” MPs, 1715-1820 (Oxford, 1995), pp. 39-49, 66-90, 206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Stones, , An Open Elite?, pp. 216, 404–05Google Scholar; Rogers, N., “Money, land and lineage: the big bourgeoisie of Hanoverian London,” Social History 4 (10 1977): 446–50Google Scholar; Beckett, , English aristocracy, p. 75Google Scholar. Colin Jones argues for the existence of a bourgeois culture that was autonomous from and increasingly hostile to the nobility of eighteenth-century France. “Bourgeois revolution revivified,” pp. 69-118.

75 The last two paragraphs are based on Borsay, Peter, The English urban renaissance: culture and society in the provincial towns, 1660-1770 (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar. Other sources include Clark, Peter, “Introduction,” and “The civic leaders of Gloucester 1580-1800,” in The Transformation of English provincial towns, 1600-1800 (London, 1984), pp. 13-61, 311–45Google Scholar; Everitt, Alan, “Social Mobility in Early Modern England,” Past & Present 33 (1966): pp. 70–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thompson, F. M. L., “Town and City,” in The Cambridge Social History of Britain, 1750-1950, ed. Thompson, , 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1990), 1: 16–23Google Scholar.

76 Jenkins, , Making of a ruling class, pp. 193-94, 212-13, 218-24, 239–55Google Scholar; Sedgwick, Romney, The House of Commons 1715-1754, 2 vols. (London, 1970), 1: 139Google Scholar; Thome, R. G., The House of Commons 1790-1820, 4 vols. (London, 1986), 1: 292–93Google Scholar. For the anglicization of the Scottish nobility see McCahill, , “The Scottish peerage and the House of Lords in the late eighteenth century,” Scottish Historical Review 51(1972): 174–77Google Scholar.

77 Colley, Linda, Britons: forging the nation, 1707-1837 (New Haven, 1992), pp. 167–70Google Scholar; Langford, Paul, Public life and propertied Englishmen, 1689-1798 (Oxford, 1991), pp. 548–52Google Scholar.

78 Ibid., pp. 569-76.

79 Langford stresses aristocratic accommodation to middle class standards. Ibid., pp. 510-80. The evident eagerness of many English bourgeoisie to adopt the forms of aristocratic life, even if they did not purchase estates, demonstrates that that accommodation worked two ways.

80 Jupp, Peter, “The landed elite and political authority in Britain, ca. 1760-1850,” JBS 29 (01 1990): 75–77Google Scholar; Harling, and Mandler, , “‘Fiscal-Military’ State,” pp. 64–66Google Scholar.

81 Favre-Lejeune, , Les secrétaires du roi, 1: 74–75Google Scholar.

82 Bamford, P. W., Privilege and profit: a business family in eighteenth-century France (Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 24–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 Bien, , “Aristocracy,” pp. 622–26Google Scholar.

84 Stones, , An Open Elite?, p. 410Google Scholar.

85 Christie, Ian, Stress and stability in late eighteenth-century Britain (Oxford, 1984), pp. 56–59Google Scholar; O'Gorman, Frank, The long eighteenth century,: British political and social history, 1688-1832 (New York, 1997), pp. 108, 337Google Scholar.

86 Langford, , Public Life, pp. 569–80Google Scholar; Colley, , Britons, pp. 178-84, 188–93Google Scholar; Harling, and Mandler, , “‘Fiscal-Military’ state,” pp. 64–66Google Scholar.

87 de Tocqueville, Alexis, The Old Regime and the French Revolution, trans. Gilbert, Stuart (Garden City, N.Y., 1955), pp. 27, 36Google Scholar.

88 Public Record Office, Pitt Papers, PRO 30/8/175, f. 9.