Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:43:33.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Levellerism in Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth-Century Britain*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2014

F. K. Donnelly
Get access

Extract

This article explores the connections between the seventeenth-century Leveller movement and the democratic radicalism of the period 1790 to roughly 1840. At first glance the two appear to have much in common. Both were concerned with the extension of the franchise, the idea of a written constitution, and the equality of citizens before the law. Various commentators on the subject, including some historians, have suggested that such a continuity does indeed exist. Unfortunately this conclusion has been based for the most part on vague connections indicating a lack of solid research on this topic. An exception in this regard is the 1962 essay of Olivier Lutaud which traced many of the linkages of Leveller ideas and phrases in European literature.

By contrast historians of seventeenth-century England have tended towards a too ready acceptance of a discontinuity between the Levellers and the democrats of the post-1788 era. They have been content to consign the Levellers to “relative oblivion” and “near-oblivion,” and to assert, quite erroneously, that Leveller pamphlets were not reprinted in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. At the same time we must be aware that the historian of early nineteenth-century radical movements is not confronted with a powerful body of evidence indicating strong Leveller-radical connections. The influence of Levellerism on subsequent radical-democratic movements was subtle and somewhat oblique in nature.

Type
What Was Saint Anselm?
Information
Albion , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Summer 1988 , pp. 261 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference on British Studies 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The research for this paper was supported by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

1 See, for example, Morton, A. L., ed., Freedom in Arms: A Selection of Leveller Writings (London, 1975), p. 73Google Scholar, and Holorenshaw, H., The Levellers and the English Revolution (New York, 1971), pp. 77–78Google Scholar. Compare the remarks in Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth, 1968), pp. 24–27Google Scholar, and my “The Levellers and Early Nineteenth Century Radicalism,” Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History. 49 (1984): 24–28Google Scholar.

2 Lutaud, Olivier, “La Parti Politique ‘Niveleur’ et la première Revolution anglaise: Essai d'Historiographie,” Revue Historique 226 (1962): 77–114 and 377–414Google Scholar.

3 Frank, Joseph, The Levellers: A History of the Writings of Three Seventeenth-Century Social Democrats: John Lilburne, Richard Overton, William Walwyn (Cambridge, Mass., 1955), pp. 256 and 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., ed., The Levellers and the English Revolution (Ithaca, 1975), p. 55Google Scholar, and Hill, C., “Radical Pirates?” in M., and Jacobs, J., eds., The Origins of Anglo-American Radicalism (London, 1984), p. 17Google Scholar.

4 Hill, C., “The Norman Yoke,” in Puritanism and Revolution (London, 1969), pp. 58–125Google Scholar.

5 Resnikow, S., “The Cultural History of a Democratic Proverb,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 36 (July 1937): 391–405Google Scholar.

6 Adair, D., “Rumbold's Dying Speech, 1685, and Jefferson's Last Words on Democracy, 1826,” William and Mary Quarterly 3d ser., 9 (1952): 521–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Compare my “A Possible Source for Nathan Hale's Dying Words,” William and Mary Quarterly 3rd ser., 42 (July 1985): 394–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Anon., A Catalogue of the Collection of Catherine Macaulay, afterwards Graham (London, 1790), in B[ritish] L[ibrary]Google Scholar. On her career see, Donnelly, L. M., “The Celebrated Mrs. Macaulay,” William and Mary Quarterly 3d ser., 6 (1949): 173–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Quoted in Hackwood, F. W., William Hone, His Life and Times (London, 1912), p. 40Google Scholar. I am indebted to J. Ann Hone for drawing this to my attention.

9 Godwin, W., History of the Commonwealth of England from its Commencement to the Restoration of Charles the Second, 4 vols. (London, 1824–1828), 2: 449–450nGoogle Scholar.

10 The Tryal of Lieutenant Colonel John Lilburne, (London, 1710)Google Scholar appears to be the only Leveller tract reprinted by H. Hills.

11 The original inscribed pamphlet is in private possession.

12 Anon., An Epistle from Col. John Lilburne, In the Shades, to John Wilkes, Esq: late a Colonel in the Buckinghamshire Militia (London, n.d./1763?) in Guildhall Library, LondonGoogle Scholar.

13 Lilburne, John, Liberty Vindicated against Slavery, shewing that imprisonments for debt, refusing to answer interrogatories long imprisonment, though for just causes, etc., are all destructive to the fundamental laws, and common freedom of the people of England: by a lover of his country, first published in the year 1646. (London, 1771)Google Scholar. I am indebted to Jo Innes for drawing this item to my attention. The only copy is in the Harvard Law Library. Lilburne, John, An Unhappy game at Scotch and English, or, A Full Answer from England to the papers of Scotland (London, 1752 and 1811)Google Scholar.

14 According to the British Museum and NUC catalogues.

15 Anon., The Leveller: or The Principles and Maxims concerning Government and Religion, which are asserted by those that are commonly called Levellers (London, 1659)Google Scholar, reprinted in The Harleian Miscellany, 12 vols. (London, 1808–1811), 7: 36ff.Google Scholar, and in Anon., Tracts for the People (London, 1840)Google ScholarPubMed, and in The English Chartist Circular: And Temperance Record for England & Wales, ed. J. Cleave, nos. 14 and 15 (n.d., 1841–1842?). According to Hill, C., The Experience of Defeat (London, 1984), p. 34Google Scholar, it might have been written by John Wildman. I am indebted to Dorothy Thompson and David Martin for their help with this item.

16 “John Lilburne,” in Biographia Britannica…, 6 vols. (London, 1747–1766), 5: 2937–2961Google Scholar.

17 Cobbett, W., Cobbett's Parliamentary History of England, 36 vols. (London, 1806–1820), 3: 615–625, 738–745, 1005–1011, 1267–1277 and 1310–1311Google Scholar; Cobbett, W. and Howell, T., eds., Cobbett's Complete Collections of State Trials, 33 vols. (London, 1809–1826), 3: 1315–1368 and 4: 1275 and 1353–1369Google Scholar.

18 Kimber, Isaac, The Life of Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of the Commonwealth (London, 1725)Google Scholar, and Banks, John [A Gentleman of the Middle Temple], A Short Critical Review of the Political Life of Oliver Cromwell… (Glasgow, 1755)Google Scholar. Both books were republished several times in the eighteenth century. Rushworth, John. Historical Collections…, 6 vols. (London, 1701), 2:1360Google Scholar.

19 Macaulay, C., The History of England from the Accession of James I to the Elevation of the House of Hanover, 5 vols. (London, 1769–1772), 3: 332–333 and 381Google Scholar; Hallam, H., The Constitutional History of England, 2 vols. (London, 1827), 2: 95–98Google Scholar; Brodie, G., A History of the British Empire, 4 vols. (Edinburgh, 1822), 2: 347Google Scholar and 4:104–107, 253, 377 and Godwin, W., History of the Commonwealth of England, 3: 45–82Google Scholar.

20 See Lee, J., “Political Antiquarianism Unmasked: the Conservative Attack on the Myth of the Ancient Constitution,” Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 55 (1982): 166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Johnson, Samuel, A Dictionary of the English Language… (London, 1813), p. 461Google Scholar.

22 Holcroft, T., A Letter to the Right Honourable William Windham, on the Intemperance and Dangerous Tendency of his Public Conduct (London, 1795), p. 31Google Scholar. The charge of Levellerism was also put against American republican rebels in the 1770s, early-nineteenth-century Welshmen, English Chartists, and the Canadian rebels of 1837. See Norton, Mary Beth, The British-Americans: The Loyalist Exiles in England 1774–1789 (Boston & Toronto, 1972), p. 141Google Scholar; Thomas, P., Strangers From a Secret Land (Toronto, 1986), p. 30Google Scholar, and Anon., The True Briton of the Nineteenth Century, Canadian Patriots and English Chartists (London, 1840), pp. 19 and 21Google Scholar. For the 1790s see the many letters received by John Reeves's “Association for the Protection and Liberty and Property against Republicans and Levellers,” in Reeves Papers, B.L., Add. Mss. 16919–16921. For charges that Quakers, Dissenters, and Brownists were Levellers see the letter signed “A Quaker” in Politics for the People (1791), vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 66–68Google Scholar; Gentleman's Magazine (1791), Part 1, p. 556, and the handwritten booklet entitled “The Loungere's Common Place Book” (London, 1792)Google ScholarPubMed, in Reeves Papers, B.L., Add. Mss., 16925, respectively. By contrast the application of the term to Scottish agrarian protestors in the early eighteenth century is of independent origin. See Leopold, W., “The Levellers Revolt in Galloway in 1724,” Scottish Labour History Society Journal 14 (1980): 4–29Google Scholar.

23 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (New York, 1955), pp. 14, 55–56Google Scholar, and Paine, Thomas, Rights of Man (Harmondsworth, 1969) p. 194Google Scholar. Paine's remark is echoed by an Aldgate radical club's charge that “Despotism is a levelling principle,” in A Thing of Shreds and Patches, by an Association against Levellers and to Procure a Restoration of the Rights of the People (Aldgate, 1793), p. 1n.Google Scholar, and by Thelwall, John in Tribune, 1795, 2: 239Google Scholar, where he states “Reeve's Association publicly propagated the doctrine of levelling property, which was never thought of before.”

24 Spence, T., “Societies of Levellers,” in The Giant Killer, or, Anti-Landlord, no. 2, 13 Aug. 1814, 14n.Google Scholar, copy in Place Collection, B.L., Add. Mss. 27808, and Poor Man's Guardian, 8 Oct. 1831. See also John Knight's sympathetic use of the expression “poor leveller” in Manchester & Salford Advertiser, 31 Jan. 1835.

25 Sheffield Constitutional Society, An Appeal to Britons (June, 1794)Google Scholar, handbill in Public Record Office, London, Home Office papers, HO 42/31.

26 Dyer, G., The Complaints of the Poor People of England (London, 1793), pp. 92–93Google Scholar.

27 Green, T. A., Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury 1200–1800 (Chicago, 1985), pp. 153–199 and passimCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Towers, J., Observations on the Rights and Duty of Juries in Trials for Libels… (London, 1784)Google Scholar, reprinted in his Tracts on Political and other Subjects 3 vols. (London, 1795), 3Google Scholar.

29 Hawles, John, The Englishman's Right: A Dialogue between a Barrister at Law and a Juryman… (London, 1680Google Scholar; reprinted by London Corresponding Society, 1793).

30 Tribune, 1795, 3: 226Google Scholar.

31 Hackwood, , William Hone, p. 40Google Scholar; Smith, O., The Politics of Language 1791–1819 (Oxford, 1984), pp. 196–201Google Scholar.

32 Robbins, C., The Eighteenth Century Commonwealthsman… (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), p. 3Google Scholar.

33 “John Lilburne,” in Anon., A Biographical Dictionary; containing accurate sketches of the Lives of the Most Eminent Persons of every Nation (Edinburgh, 1809), p. 407Google Scholar. The remark is attributed to Henry Marten, Lilburne's contemporary. See also Craik, G. L., The Pictorial History of England, 8 vols. (London, 1840), 3: 302–303Google Scholar.

34 On heroes see, Karsten, P., Patriot-Heroes in England and America: Political Symbolism and Changing Values over Three Centuries (Madison, 1978)Google Scholar; B. Worden, “The Commonwealth Kidney of Algernon Sidney,” and Schwoerer, Lois, “William, Lord Russell: The Making of a Martyr, 1683–1983,” both in Journal of British Studies 24, 1 (1985): 1–40 and 41–71 respectivelyCrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Harrison, B. and Hollis, P., eds., Robert Lowery: Radical and Chartist (London, 1979), p. 63Google Scholar.

35 National Vindicator, 22 Jan. 1842.

36 English Chartist Circular, no. 14 (1842).

37 Jones, G. Stedman, Languages of Class: Studies in English Working-Class History, 1832–1982 (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 90–178Google Scholar.