Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:13:49.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quo vadis, design space explorer?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2006

GABRIELA GOLDSCHMIDT
GABRIELA GOLDSCHMIDT
Affiliation:
Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper presents aspects of designer action that stress cognitive strategies for effective design problem solving, under the headings of exploration and representation. It proposes that links among design moves and shifts between design arguments are of prime importance in exploration and the design space should accommodate and expose them. The primacy of self-generated representations in the form of free-hand sketches and the role of arbitrary visual stimuli as supporting design reasoning is introduced. The expositions lead to the conclusion that the design space should be conceived as a multilevel and multifacet construct that supports on the spot experimentation and provides essential feedback not only regarding designs, but also concerning the process of designing.

Keywords

Design SpaceExplorationLinks Among Design MovesRepresentationShifts in Argument Modality
Type
RESPONSE TO KEYNOTE
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , May 2006 , pp. 105 - 111
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akın, Ö. (1999). Variants of design cognition. In Cognition in Design Education (Eastman, C., McCracken, M. & Newstetter, W., Eds.), pp. 105–124. New York: Elsevier [referenced in Woodbury & Burrow keynote].
Anderson, S. (1984). Architectural design: a system of research programs. Design Studies 5(3), 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies 3(4), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dorst, K. & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22(5), 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, J. (2001). Customizing mass housing: a discursive grammar for Siza's Malagueira houses. PhD Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984/1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fish, J. (2004). Cognitive catalysis: sketches for a time-lagged brain. In Design Representation (Goldschmidt, G. & Porter, W.L., Eds.), pp. 151–184. London: Springer–Verlag.CrossRef
Fish, J. & Scrivener, S. (1990). Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4(2), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1997). Capturing indeterminism: representation in the design problem space. Design Studies 18(4), 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (2001). Is a figure-concept binary argumentation pattern inherent in visual design reasoning? Proc. Second Int. Conf. Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design: Computational and Cognitive Approaches, pp. 177–205.
Goldschmidt, G. (2003a). Cognitive economy in design reasoning. In Human Behaviour in Design (Lindemann, U., Ed.), pp. 53–62. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Goldschmidt, G. (2003b). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Design Issues 19(1), 72–88.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. & Smolkov, M. (2004). Design problems are not of a kind: differences in the effectiveness of visual stimuli in design problem solving. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design (Gero, J.S., Tversky, B. & Knight, T., Eds.), pp. 199–218.
Goldschmidt, G. & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies 26(6), 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Habraken, N. J. (1985). The Appearance of the Form. Cambridge, MA: Awater Press.
Lawson, B. (1980/1997). How Designers Think. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Lawson, B. (2004). What Designers Know. Oxford: Architectural Press.
Maher, M.-L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. (1996). Formalising design exploration as co-evolution: a combined gene approach. In Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD (Gero, J.S. & Sudweeks, F., Eds.), pp. 1–28. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRef
Malaga, R.A. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems 29(1), 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, W.J. & Stiny, G. (1978). The Palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 5(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pothos, E.M. (2005). The rules versus similarity distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(1), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quantrill, M. (1983). Alvar Aalto: A Critical Study. London: Secker & Warburg.
Rittel, H.J.W. & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, P.A., Green, G., & McGown, A. (2001). Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design Studies 22(5), 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18(4), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lugt, R. (2001). Sketching in design idea generation meetings. PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
van der Lugt, R. (2003). Relating the quality of the idea generation process to the quality of the resulting design ideas. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Engineering Design (Folkeson, A., Gralén, K., Norell, M. & Sellgren, U., Eds.), Stockholm: Design Society [CD].