Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A function–behavior–structure ontology of processes

  • John S. Gero (a1) and Udo Kannengiesser (a2)

Abstract

This paper presents how the function–behavior–structure (FBS) ontology can be used to represent processes despite its original focus on representing objects. The FBS ontology provides a uniform framework for classifying processes, and includes higher level semantics in their representation. We show that this ontology supports a situated view of processes based on a model of three interacting worlds. The situated FBS framework is then used to describe the situated design of processes.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [reprinted 1977].
Bickhard, M.H., & Campbell, R.L. (1996). Topologies of learning. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2), 111156.
Chandler, A.D. (1962). Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chandrasekaran, B., Goel, A.K., & Iwasaki, Y. (1993). Functional representation as design rationale. IEEE Computer 26(1), 4856.
Chandrasekaran, B., & Josephson, J.R. (2000). Function in device representation. Engineering with Computers 16(3–4), 162177.
Clancey, W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clibbon, K., & Edmonds, E. (1996). Representing strategic design knowledge. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 9(4), 349357.
Cross, N. (1994). Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. Chichester: Wiley.
Cummings, S., & Wilson, D., Eds. (2003). Images of Strategy. Oxford: Blackwell.
de Kleer, J., & Brown, J.S. (1984). A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 24, 783.
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3, 357370.
Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 2636.
Gero, J.S. (1999). Constructive memory in design thinking. In Design Thinking Research Symposium: Design Representation (Goldschmidt, G., & Porter, W., Eds.), pp. 2935. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Gero, J.S., & Fujii, H. (2000). A computational framework for concept formation for a situated design agent. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(6), 361368.
Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373391.
Grabowski, H., Rude, S., & Grein, G., eds. (1998). Universal Design Theory. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.
Gruber, T.R. (1989). Automated knowledge acquisition for strategic knowledge. Machine Learning 4, 293336.
Haymaker, J., & Fischer, M. (2001). Challenges and Benefits of 4D Modeling on the Walt Disney Concert Hall Project, CIFE Working Paper 64. Stanford, CA: Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University.
Hori, K. (2000). An ontology of strategic knowledge: key concepts and applications, Knowledge-Based Systems 13, 369374.
Hubka, V., & Eder, W.E. (1996). Design Science: Introduction to the Needs, Scope and Organization of Engineering Design Knowledge. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
International Alliance for Interoperability. (2006). Industry Foundation Classes IFC2x (3rd ed.). Accessed at http://www.iai-international.org/Model/R2x3_final/index.htm
Kitamura, Y., Kashiwase, M., Fuse, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (2004). Deployment of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(2), 115127.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J.A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6(3), 257272.
Motus, L., & Rodd, M.G. (1994). Timing Analysis of Real-Time Software. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Murdock, J.W., & Goel, A. (2001). Meta-case-based reasoning: using functional models to adapt case-based agents. Proc. Int. Conf. Case-Based Reasoning 2001 (Aha, D.W., & Watson, I., Eds.), pp. 407421. Berlin: Springer.
NIST. (1993). Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0), Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
NIST. (2000). The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specification, NIST Internal Report 6459. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
NIST. (2004). Inputs and Outputs in the Process Specification Language, NIST Internal Report 7152. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Harper Collins.
Schön, D.A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13(2), 135156.
Sim, S.K., & Duffy, A.H.B. (1998). A foundation for machine learning in design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12(2), 193209.
Smith, G.J., & Gero, J.S. (2005). What does an artificial design agent mean by being “situated”? Design Studies 26(5), 535561..
Stone, R.B., & Wood, K.L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 359370.
Stroulia, E., & Goel, A. (1995). Functional representation and reasoning in reflective systems. Journal of Applied Intelligence 9(1), 101124.
Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (1999). Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: a key to creative designs. In Computational Models of Creative Design IV (Gero, J.S., & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 297320. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
von der Weth, R. (1999). Design instinct?—The development of individual strategies. Design Studies 20(5), 453463.
Wiest, J.D., & Levy, F.K. (1977). A Management Guide to PERT/CPM. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Ziemke, T. (1999). Rethinking grounding. In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality? (Riegler, A., Peschl, M., & von Stein, A., Eds.), pp. 177190. New York: Plenum Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

A function–behavior–structure ontology of processes

  • John S. Gero (a1) and Udo Kannengiesser (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.