Becker, Gary S.
1982. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics
Capehart, Tom. 1997. “The Tobacco Progam: a Summary and Update.” In, Tobacco: Situation and Outlook Report, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, April (TBS-238):31-34.
Capehart, Tom. 1999. “Tobacco Products.” In, Tobacco: Situation and Outlook Report, Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, September (TBS-244):4-9.
Daniel, Pete. 1985. Breaking the Land: The Transformation of Cotton, Tobacco, and Rice Culture Since 1880. University of Illinois Press.
Hudec, Robert E.
1997. “Tiger, Tiger in the House: a Critical Appraisal of the Case Against Discriminatory Trade Measures.” In, Implementing the Uruguay Round, Jackson, John H. and Sykes, Alan O., Eds. 167–212. Clarendon Press.
Jackson, John H.
1969. World Trade and the Law of the GATT. Bobbs-Merrill.
Nourse, Edwin G., Davis, Joseph S., and Black, John D.
1937. Three Years of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration. The Brookings Institution.
Rucker, Randal R., Thurman, Walter N., and Sumner, Daniel A.
1995. Restricting the Market for Quota: an Analysis of Tobacco Production Rights with Corroboration from Congressional Testimony. Journal of Political Economy
1998. “Auctioning the Tariff Quota for U.S Sugar Imports.” In, Sugar and Sweetener: Situation and Outlook Report. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, May (SSS-223):17-22.
1999a. “The Economics of TRQ Administration.” International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium Working Paper 99-6, May.
1999b. “U.S. Tariff Rate Quotas for Peanuts.” In, Oil Crops Yearbook. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, October (OCS-1999):45-53
Trela, Irene and Whalley, John. 1995. Internal Quota Allocation Schemes and the Costs of the MFA. Review of International Economics
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division. 1999. “Sugar Program: Changing the Method for Setting Import Quotas Could Reduce Cost to Users.” GAO/RCED-99-209.