Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:02:43.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tariff Rate Quota Implementation and Administration by Developing Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Philip Abbott
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Purdue University
B. Adair Morse
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics at Purdue University
Get access

Abstract

Tariff rate quota administration and implementation are empirically evaluated for the fourteen developing countries notifying the WTO of the use of TRQs. FAO trade data, UNCTAD data on applied tariffs and the WTO notifications permit us to assess underfill of quotas, discrimination among exporters, use of state trading as an implementation mechanism, and the extent of protection under these TRQs. Substantial liberalization was found, generally due to use of low MFN tariffs rather than through TRQs permitting greater market access. High tariff bindings and endogenous quotas allow these countries to pursue flexible trade regimes within their WTO commitments.

Type
Issues in the Administration of Tariff-Rate Import Quotas in the Agreement on Agriculture in the WTO
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Philip and Morse, Adair. 1999. “TRQ Implementation in Developing Countries.” Paper presented at the World Bank/WTO conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda in WTO 2000 Negotiations, Geneva, Switzerland, October 1-2.Google Scholar
Abbott, Philip and Young, Linda. 1999. “Wheat Importing State Trading Agencies: Implications for International Wheat Markets.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47: 199–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Philip and Paarlberg, Philip. 1998. “Tariff Rate Quotas: Structural and Stability Impacts in Growing Markets.” Agricultural Economics 19: 257267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughner, Devry S., and de Gorter, Harry. 1998. “The Economics of 2-tier Tariff-Rate Import Quotas and the Agreement on Agriculture in the WTO.” Revised version of a Paper presented to the International Agricultural Trade Consortium at St. Petersburg, Florida, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, April.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 1999. AGROSTAT Database. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Ingco, Merlinda. 1995. “Agricultural Liberalization in the Uruguay Round.” Finance and Development 32: 3.Google Scholar
Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 1999. “Broad Market Access Gains Resulting from China WTO Negotiations.” USTR, Washington DC, April. Google Scholar
Royame du Maroc. 1996. Bulletin Officiel (Legislation establishing agricultural tariffs), No. 4375, Rabat, Morocco, May 6.Google Scholar
Skully, David. 1999. “The Economics of Tariff-Rate Quota Administration.” Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington DC, September. Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 1999. Trade Analysis and Information System, TRAINS. CD-Rom version 6.0, UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1996. Complete Results of the Uruguay Round. (CDRom: ISBN 92-870-0145-6), WTO, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO), Committee on Agriculture, 1995-1999. Notifications. (Various countries and submissions—AG/N/cty/# where cty denotes country and # is the submission), MA:1 and MA:2 submissions, WTO Document Dissemination Facility, Geneva.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO), Secretariat. 1998a. “Tariff and Other Quotas.” (AIE/S1/Rev.l), WTO, Geneva, May 26.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) Secretariat. 1998b. “Tariff Quota Administration and Tariff Quota Fill.” (AIE/S4/Rev.1), WTO, Geneva, June 10.Google Scholar