Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:08:09.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Air Pollution and Farm-Level Crop Yields: An Empirical Analysis of Corn and Soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

David A. Westenbarger
Affiliation:
Natural Resources and Environment Division of the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
George B. Frisvold
Affiliation:
Natural Resources and Environment Division of the Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Get access

Abstract

While many studies have estimated the impacts of air pollution on crop yields on experimental plots, few have estimated these impacts under actual farm production conditions. This study econometrically estimates the impact of air pollution on corn and soybean yields, controlling for weather, soil quality and management practices, using farm-level data for the eastern United States. Ozone pollution was found to reduce yields for both crops. The mean elasticity of yield with respect to ozone exposure was − 0.19 for corn and − 0.54 for soybeans. The benefits of ozone standards to protect crops, measured in terms of crop revenues, range from $17 to $82 million depending on the stringency of the standard. Over 85 percent of the revenue gains are captured by three states: Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R., Crocker, T., and Thanavibulchai, N.An Economic Assessment of Air Pollution Damages to Selected Annual Crops in Southern California.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 9 (1982): 4258.Google Scholar
Adams, R., Hamilton, S., and McCarl, B.The Benefits of Pollution Control: The Case of Ozone and U.S. Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986): 886–93.Google Scholar
Adams, R.M., Hamilton, S.A., and McCarl, B.A., The economic effects of ozone on agriculture, EPA-600/3-84-090, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, 1984.Google Scholar
Barse, J.R., Ferguson, W., and Whetzel, V. Effects of Air Pollution and Acid Rain on Agriculture: An Annotated Bibliography. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Staff Report No. AGES850702, Washington, DC, 1985.Google Scholar
Bilonick, R.A.Monthly Hydrogen Ion Deposition Maps for the Northeastern U.S. from July 1982 to September 1984.” Atmospheric Environment 22 (1988): 1909–24.Google Scholar
Brown, D. and Smith, M.Crop Substitution in the Estimation of Economic Benefits Due to Ozone Reduction.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11 (1984): 347–62.Google Scholar
Dixon, B.L., Garcia, P., and Mjelde, J.W.Primal Versus Dual Methods for Measuring the Impact of Ozone on Cash Grain Farmers,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985): 402–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, P., Dixon, B.L., Mjelde, J.W., and Adams, R.M.Measuring the Benefits of Environmental Change Using a Duality Approach: The Case of Ozone and Illinois Cash Grain Farms.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13 (1986): 6980.Google Scholar
Hamilton, S., McCarl, B., and Adams, R.The Effect of Aggregate Response Assumptions on Environmental Impact Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985): 407–13.Google Scholar
Hansen, L.Farmer Response to Changes in Climate: The Case of Corn Production.” Journal of Agricultural Economics Research 43 (1991): 1825.Google Scholar
Heck, W.W.Assessment of Crop Losses From Air Pollutants in the United States” In Mackenzie, J. and El-Ashry, M. (eds.) Air Pollution's Toll on Forests and Crops, Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Heck, W.W., Cure, W.W., Rawlings, J.O., Zaragoza, L.J., Heagle, A.S., Heggestad, H.E., Kohut, R.J., Kress, L.W., and Temple, P.J.Assessing Impacts of Ozone on Agricultural Crops: Crop Yield Functions and Alternative Exposure Statistics.” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 34 (1984): 810–7.Google Scholar
Heck, W.W., Taylor, O.C., Adams, R.M., Bingham, G., Miller, J., Preston, E., and Weinstein, L.Assessment of Crop Loss from Ozone.” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 32 (1982): 353–61.Google Scholar
Heggestad, H.E., and Lesser, V.M.Effects of Ozone, Sulfur Dioxide, Soil Water Deficit, and Cultivar on Yields of Soybean.” Journal of Environmental Quality 19 (1990): 488–95.Google Scholar
Isaaks, E. and Srivastava, M. Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Kopp, R.J., Vaughn, W.J., and Hazilla, M. Agricultural Sector Benefits Analysis for Ozone: Methods Evaluation and Demonstration. Raleigh NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, EPA-450/5-84-003, 1984.Google Scholar
Leduc, S.K., and Sakamoto, C.M.Regional/National Crop Loss Assessment Modeling Approaches” in Assessment of Crop Loss From Air Pollutants, Heck, W.W., Taylor, O.C., and Tingey, D.T. (eds.), New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
Lee, E.H., Tingey, D.T. and Hogsett, W.E.Evaluation of Ozone Exposure Indices in Exposure-Response Modelling.” Environmental Pollution 53 (1988): 4362.Google Scholar
Lefohn, A.S., Benkovitz, C.M., Tanner, R.L., and Smith, L.A., Acidic Deposition: State of Science and Technology, Report 7, Air Quality Measurements and Characterizations for Terrestrial Effects Research, National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.Google Scholar
Lefohn, A.S., “The Characterization of Ambient Ozone Exposures.” in Surface Level Ozone Exposures and their Effects on Vegetation, Lefohn, A. (ed.), Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Lefohn, A.S., Laurence, J.A., and Kohut, R.J.A Comparison of Indices That Describe the Relationship Between Exposure to Ozone and Reduction in the Yield of Agricultural Crops.” Atmospheric Environment 22 (1988): 1229–40.Google Scholar
Lefohn, A.S., and Runeckles, V.C.Establishing Standards to Protect Vegetation-Ozone Exposure/Dose Considerations.” Atmospheric Environment, 21 (1987): 561–68.Google Scholar
Leung, S.K., Reed, W., and Geng, S.Estimations of Ozone Damage to Selected Crops Grown in Southern California.” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 32 (1982): 160–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, M.G., Carter, P.R. and Oplinger, E.S.Tillage and Crop Rotation Affect Corn, Soybean, and Winter Wheat Yields.” Journal of Production Agriculture 6 (1993): 207–13.Google Scholar
Meese, B.G., Carter, P.R., Oplinger, E.S., and Pendleton, J.W.Corn/Soybean Rotation Effects as Influenced by Tillage, Nitrogen, and Hybrid/Cultivar.” Journal of Production Agriculture 4 (1991): 7480.Google Scholar
Miller, J.E., Heagle, A.S., Vozzo, S.F., Philbeck, R.B., and Heck, W.W.Effects of Ozone and Water Stress, Separately and in Combination, on Soybean Yield.” Journal of Environmental Quality 18 (1989): 330–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulchi, C.Estimating the Economic Impact of Air Pollution on Maryland Agriculture.” Maryland Institute for Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural Experiment Station, 1994.Google Scholar
Musselman, R., Oshima, R., and Gallavan, R.Significance of Pollutant Concentration Distribution in the Response of Red Kidney Beans to Ozone.” Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 108 (1983): 347–51.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress. Acid Rain and Transported Air Pollutants: Implications for Public Policy, Report OTA-0-204, 1984.Google Scholar
Oshima, R.J., Poe, M.P., Braegelmann, P.K., Baldwin, D.W., and Van Way, V.Ozone Dosage-Crop Loss Function for Alfalfa: A Standardized Method for Assessing Crop Losses From Air Pollutants.” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 26 (1976): 861–65.Google Scholar
Shriner, D., Cure, W., Heagle, A., Heck, W., Johnson, D., Olsen, R., and Skelly, J.An Analysis of Potential Agriculture and Forestry Impacts of Long-Range Transport of Air Pollutants.” ORNL-5910 Oakridge National Laboratory, Oakridge, TN, 1983.Google Scholar
Stanford Research Institute. “An Estimate of the Nonhealth Benefits of Meeting Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards.” Final Report to the National Commission on Air Quality, 1981.Google Scholar
Teigen, L.D., and Singer, F. Weather in U.S. Agriculture: Monthly Temperature and Precipitation by State and Farm Production Region, 1950–90. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, SB-834, 1992.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Iowa State Statistical Laboratory. “Basic Statistics: 1982 National Resources Inventory.” SB-756, Washington DC, 1989.Google Scholar
Westenbarger, D.A., and Frisvold, G.B.Agricultural Exposure to Ozone and Acid Precipitation.” Atmospheric Environment 28 (1994): 2895–907.Google Scholar