Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T05:20:51.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Food Products in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Jill J. McCluskey
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Washington State University
Kristine M. Grimsrud
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Hiromi Ouchi
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Washington State University
Thomas I. Wahl
Affiliation:
International Marketing Program for the Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT) Center, Washington State University
Get access

Abstract

In Japan, a large U.S. export market, there has been growing public opposition against genetically modified (GM) foods. Using a dichotomous choice contingent valuation method, findings show the discount needed for Japanese Seikyou consumers to purchase GM food products is positively affected (i.e., a greater discount is required) by higher levels of self-reported risk perceptions toward GM food, higher levels of concern about food safety and the environment, higher self-reported knowledge about biotechnology, education levels, and income. Interestingly, gender does not significantly affect the discount needed for GM food. Further, it can be inferred from the results that a transformation of Japanese consumers’ perceptions and attitudes is needed for GM food products to successfully enter the Japanese market.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shimbun, Asahi. (2001, June 14). “GMO Crops: Research and Development in Thirty-Four Provinces” pp. 18 [Japanese newspaper]. Online. Available at www.asahi.com.Google Scholar
Baker, G. A., and Burnham, T. A. (2001, December). “Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2), 387403.Google Scholar
Cameron, T. A., and Huppert, D. D. (1989). “OLS versus ML Estimation of Non-market Resource Values with Payment Card Interval Data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17, 230246.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B. J. (1991). “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 12551263.Google Scholar
Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J., and Kanninen, B. J. (1999). “The Statistical Analysis of Discrete Response CV Data.” In Bateman, I. J. and Willis, K. G. (eds.), Valuing Environmental Preferences (pp. 302442). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoban, T. J. (1999). “Consumer Acceptance of Biotechnology in the United States and Japan.” Food Technology 53(5), 5053.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, W. G., Scarpa, R., Chilton, S. M., and McCallion, T. (2001). “Parametric and Non-parametric Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Forest Recreation in Northern Ireland: A Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Study with Follow-Ups.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 52, 104122.Google Scholar
Japan Ministry of Public Management, Home Affairs, Posts, and Telecommunications. (2002). Japan Statistical Yearbook. Various population statistics. Online. Available at http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/index.htm.Google Scholar
Jussaume, R. A. Jr., and Higgins, L. (1998). “Attitudes Towards Food Safety and the Environment: A Comparison of Consumers in Japan and the U.S.Rural Sociology 63(3), 394411.Google Scholar
Jussaume, R. A. Jr., and Judson, D. H. (1992). “Public Perceptions About Food Safety in the United States and Japan.” Rural Sociology 57(2), 235249.Google Scholar
Kanninen, B. J. (1993). “Optimal Experimental Design for Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” Land Economics 69(2), 138146.Google Scholar
Lusk, J. L., Daniel, M. S., Mark, D. R., and Lusk, C. L. (2001, July). “Alternative Calibration and Auction Institutions for Predicting Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nongenetically Modified Corn Chips.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(1), 4057.Google Scholar
Lusk, J. L., Roosen, J., and Fox, J. A. (2003). “Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Com: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85, 1629.Google Scholar
Macer, D., and Chen Ng, M. A. (2000). “Changing Attitudes to Biotechnology in Japan.” Nature Biotechnology 18, 945947.Google ScholarPubMed
McCluskey, J. J. (2000, 2nd Quarter). “Read the Warning: This Product May Contain GMOsChoices, pp. 3942.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. C., De Pinto, A., Bullock, D., Nitsi, E. I., Rosegrant, M., Josling, T., Babinard, J., Cunningham, C., Unnevehr, L., and Hill, L. (1999). “The Economics and Politics of Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture: Implications for WTO 2000.” Bulletin No. 809, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Noussair, C., Robin, S., and Ruffieux, B. (2002). “Do Consumers Not Care About Biotech Food or Do They Just Not Read the Labels?Economic Letters 75, 4753.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. W., and Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mainichi Shimbun, Shinano. (2001, April 26). Article announcing Japan's new system of labeling GM foods, p. 2. [Regional Nagano newspaper]. Online. Available at www.Shinmai.co.jp/Shinmai/Shimle.html.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. (1987). “Perception of Risk.” Science 236, pp. 280285.Google ScholarPubMed
Tolbert, K. (2000, January 24). “In Japan, It's Back to Nature; Consumers Add Non-Modified Products to Shopping CartThe Washington Post, p. A8.Google Scholar
Welsh, M. P., and Poe, G. L. (1998). “Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple-Bounded Discrete Choice Approach.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 170185.Google Scholar
Yoo, S.-H., and Yang, H.-J. (2001). “Application of Sample Selection Model to Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies.” Environmental and Resource Economics 20, 147163.Google Scholar