Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:55:10.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The will to mobility: life-space satisfaction and distress in people with dementia who live alone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2014

BARBARA TERESA LLOYD  and
CHRISTINE STIRLING
BARBARA TERESA LLOYD*
Affiliation:
Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Australia.
CHRISTINE STIRLING
Affiliation:
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Tasmania, Australia.
*
Address for correspondence: Christine Stirling, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia. E-mail: Christine.Stirling@utas.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Increasing numbers of people with dementia reside in single-person households, yet little is known of their experiences and priorities. This exploratory Australian study elicited perceptions of seven people with dementia living alone, regarding their domestic environment and its surroundings. The general aim was to identify unmet service needs in this vulnerable population. Drawing upon the theoretical concepts of ‘the will to mobility’ and ‘life-space’, we identified four factors of particular salience to our respondents. These were access to public space, social distance and proximity, changing meanings of space and objects, and imaginative co-presence. Participants provided useful insights into a soon-to-be-common scenario in which increased numbers of people with dementia will be living without a resident carer. The findings have implications for the development of more personalised and targeted dementia care in the domestic setting, more inclusive public planning and more extensive public education programmes.

Keywords

dementialiving alonewill to mobilitylife-spacedementia servicespublic planning
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 35 , Issue 9 , October 2015 , pp. 1801 - 1820
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernethy, B., Kippers, V., Hanrahan, S., Pandy, M., McManus, A. and Mackinnon, L. 2013. Biophysical Foundations of Human Movement. Macmillan, Melbourne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, Z. 2012. The Prometheus Myth in the sculptures of Sami Mohammad and the plays of Aeschylus and Shelley. Comparative Literature Studies, 49, 1, 50–83.Google Scholar
Alzheimer's Disease International 2010. World Alzheimer Report: The Global Economic Impact of Dementia. Alzheimer's Disease International, London.Google Scholar
Andrew, A. 2006. The ethics of using dolls and soft toys in dementia care. Nursing and Residential Care, 8, 9, 419–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, J. 1996. Memory and objects. In Kirkham, P. (ed.), The Gendered Object. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK, 219–24.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. and Jacobs, K. 2010. Damned by place, then by politics: spatial disadvantage and the housing/policy–research interface. International Journal of Housing Policy, 10, 2, 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2012. Dementia in Australia. Available online at http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=10737422943 [Accessed 3 June 2013].Google Scholar
Barr, R. 2002. More road to travel by: implications for mobility and safety in late life. Gerontechnology, 2, 1, 50–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, T., Mitchell, L., Burton, E., Jenks, M., Parsons, M., Raman, S. and Williams, K. 2003. The accessibility of public spaces for people with dementia: a new priority for the ‘open city’. Disability and Society, 18, 3, 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. and Van Lente, H. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18, 3/4, 285–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannelly, T. 2006. Negotiating ethics in dementia care: an analysis of an ethic of care in practice. Dementia, 5, 2, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S., Costa, R. and Hess, U. 2012. Sometimes a bear is just a bear: no evidence of nonclinical adult toy animal ownership indicating emotion dysregulation. Journal of Adult Development, 19, 3, 177–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brorsson, A., Öhman, A., Lundberg, S. and Nygård, L. 2011. Accessibility in public space as perceived by people with Alzheimer's disease. Dementia, 10, 4, 587–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhury, H. 2002. Journey back home. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 16, 1/2, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, J. C. and Lai, C. K. 2011. Elopement among community-dwelling older adults with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 1, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicero, C. 2012. Aging in place. In Carswell, A. T. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Housing. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 17–20.Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. 2010. Mobilities 1: catching up. Progress in Human Geography, 35, 4, 550–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, K., Todres, L. and Galvin, K. 2009. Lifeworld-led healthcare is more than patient-led care: an existential view of well-being. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 12, 3, 265–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damousi, J. and Lake, M. 1995. Gender and War: Australians at War in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
De Witt, L., Ploeg, J. and Black, M. 2009. Living on the threshold: the spatial experience of living alone with dementia. Dementia, 8, 2, 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, S., Blackman, T., Martyr, A. and Van Schaik, P. 2008. The impact of early dementia on outdoor life: a shrinking world? Dementia, 7, 2, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, M. 2004. Automobilities: an introduction. Theory, Culture and Society, 21, 4/5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, M. 2010. The Sociology of Immobility I. Available online at http://socandcrimatkeele.blogspot.com.au/2010/10/sociology-of-immobility-i.html [Accessed 10 November 2012].Google Scholar
Fine, G. and Hallett, T. 2003. Dust: a study in sociological miniaturism. The Sociological Quarterly, 44, 1, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T. 2012. Body memory and the unconscious. In Lohmar, D. and Brudzinska, J. (eds), Founding Psychoanalysis Phenomenologically: Phenomenological Theory of Subjectivity and the Psychoanalytic Experience. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, H., Gibson, F. and Campbell, J. 2003. Living alone with dementia: a case study approach to understanding risk. Dementia, 2, 3, 403–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glidewell, L., Johnston, M. and Thomas, R. 2012. Shared understandings of dementia? An application of the Common Sense Self Regulation Model to a case study. Dementia, 11, 2, 217–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M. 2007. Freedom and resistance: the phenomenal will in addiction. Nursing Philosophy, 8, 1, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hergenhahn, B. 2008. An Introduction to the History of Psychology. Cengage Learning, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
Hodge, G. 2008. The Geography of Aging: Preparing Communities for the Surge in Seniors. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, S. 1992. Cervantine Journeys. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
James, I. 2011. Understanding Behaviour in Dementia That Challenges: A Guide to Assessment and Treatment. Jessica Kingsley, London.Google Scholar
Jansen, S. 2012. Why is housing always satisfactory? A study into the impact of preference and experience on housing appreciation. Social Indicators Research. 29 June 2012, 1–21, doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0114-9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, V. 2010. Mobile social science: creating a dialogue among the sociologies. British Journal of Sociology, 61, s1, 367–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. and Joye, D. 2004. Motility: mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 4, 745–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, E., Bowen, C., Baer, M., Froelich, L. and Wahl, H. 2012. Dementia worry: a psychological examination of an unexplored phenomenon. European Journal of Ageing, 9, 4, 275–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Killick, J. and Allan, K. 2001. Communication and the Care of People with Dementia. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
King, P. 1996. The Limits of Housing Policy: A Philosophical Investigation. Middlesex University Press, London.Google Scholar
Kinney, J., Kart, C. and Reddecliff, L. 2011. ‘That's me, the goother’: evaluation of a program for individuals with early-onset dementia. Dementia, 10, 3, 361–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinenberg, E. 2012. Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone. Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
Kumar, K. and Makarova, E. 2008. The portable home: the domestication of public space. Sociological Theory, 26, 4, 324–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapintie, K. 2007. Modalities of urban space. Planning Theory, 6, 1, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. 1952. Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Lutz, P. 2010. Clutter moves in old age homecare. In Schillmeier, M. and Domènech, M. (eds), New Technologies and Emerging Spaces of Care. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 77–94.Google Scholar
Macquarrie, C. 2005. Experiences in early stage Alzheimer's Disease: understanding the paradox of acceptance and denial. Aging and Mental Health, 9, 5, 430–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miel, A. 1992. Roaming through a life-space. The Educational Forum, 56, 4, 457–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, S. 2011. Self and embodiment: a bio-phenomenological approach to dementia. Dementia, 10, 4, 509–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, D. 2000. Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity. New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Murata, C., Kondo, T., Tamakoshi, K., Yatsuya, H. and Toyoshima, H. 2006. Factors associated with life-space among community-living rural elders in Japan. Public Health Nursing, 23, 4, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nippert-Eng, C. 2005. Boundary play. Space and Culture, 8, 3, 302–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nourhashemi, F., Amouyal-Barkate, K., Gillette-Guyonnet, S., Cantet, C. and Vellas, B. 2005. Living alone with Alzheimer's disease: cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis in the REAL.FR Study. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 9, 2, 117–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Rioux, L. and Werner, C. 2011. Residential satisfaction among aging people living in place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 2, 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. 2003. The power of implicit motion: ‘It goes straight through’. American Imago, 60, 1, 116–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowles, G. D. 1978. Prisoners of Space? Exploring the Geographical Experience of Older People. Westview, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, R., Kilbride, J. and Nagy, S. 1992. Elders Living Alone: Frailty and the Perception of Choice. De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Schiefelbusch, M. 2010. Rational planning for emotional mobility? The case of public transport development. Planning Theory, 9, 3, 200–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. 1962. Collected Papers. Volume I. The Problem of Social Reality. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. 1999. A role for volition and attention in the generation of new brain circuitry: towards a neurobiology of mental force. In Libet, B., Freeman, A. and Sutherland, K. (eds), The Volitional Brain. Imprint Academic, Exeter, UK, 115–39.Google Scholar
Sheller, M. and Urry, J. 2006. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38, 2, 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surr, C. 2006. The role of interpretive biographical methodology in dementia research. Dementia, 5, 2, 284–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. and Tripodes, S. 2001. The effects of driving cessation on the elderly with dementia and their caregivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33, 4, 519–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, W. and Thomas, D. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Tierney, M., Snow, W., Charles, J., Moineddin, R. and Kiss, A. 2007. Neuropsychological predictors of self-neglect in cognitively impaired older people who live alone. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 2, 140–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinker, A. 1997. Housing and household movement in later life. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 12, 1/2, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirado, F., Callén, B. and Cassián, N. 2009. The question of movement in dwelling: three displacements in the care of dementia. Space and Culture, 12, 3, 371–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 2010. Health Promotion and disease Prevention. Policy Brief on Ageing Number 6. Available online at http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau/_docs/age/2010/Policy-Briefs/6-Policybrief_Health_promotion.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2012].Google Scholar
Urry, J. 2002. Mobility and Connections. Available online at http://www.ville-en-mouvement.com/telechargement/040602/mobility.pdf [Accessed 10 October 2012].Google Scholar
Urry, J. 2009. Mobilities and social theory. In Turner, B. (ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 477–95.Google Scholar
Ward, P. 1999. A History of Domestic Space: Privacy and the Canadian Home. UBC Press, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Waugh, F. 2009. Where does risk feature in community care practice with older people with dementia who live alone? Dementia, 8, 2, 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigg, J. 2010. Liberating the wanderers: using technology to unlock doors for those living with dementia. Sociology of Health and Illness, 32, 2, 288–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed