Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:12:51.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To feel safe in everyday life at home – a study of older adults after home modifications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2011

INGELA PETERSSON ,
MARGARETA LILJA  and
LENA BORELL
INGELA PETERSSON*
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institutet, Division of Occupational Therapy Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS) Stockholm, Sweden.
MARGARETA LILJA
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institutet, Division of Occupational Therapy Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS) Stockholm, Sweden.
LENA BORELL
Affiliation:
Karolinska Institutet, Division of Occupational Therapy Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS) Stockholm, Sweden.
*
Address for correspondence: Ingela Petersson, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels alle 23, 141 83 Huddinge, Sweden. E-mail: Ingela.petersson@ki.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore aspects contributing to experiences of safety in everyday life for older adults who have received modification services. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight people. Data were analysed using a comparative approach. Three main categories emanated in the analysis: prerequisites that enable a feeling of safety, strategies that enable safety in everyday life, and use of and reliance on technology impacts on safety. The findings revealed that to feel safe in everyday life was based on three prerequisites: feeling healthy, having someone to rely on and feeling at home. The fulfilment of these prerequisites further impacted on the participants' strategies for handling problems in everyday life but also on the ability to use and benefit from technology such as home modifications. In conclusion, the findings indicated that interventions provided to increase safety for older adults should primarily be focused on the presence and fulfilment of prerequisites and later on other interventions such as technology. Technology such as home modifications and assistive devices was not found in this study to facilitate the feeling of safety unless supported by the fulfilled prerequisites. Implications of these findings for clinical practice are discussed.

Keywords

ageing in placeelderlyenvironmental interventioncommunity-based rehabilitationactivities of daily livingindependenceautonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , July 2012 , pp. 791 - 811
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson-Svidén, G. and Borell, L. 1998. Experience of being occupied – some elderly people's positive experiences of occupations at community-based activity centres. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5, 3, 133–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, F. F. 2008. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Sixth edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Boverket 2005. Bostadsanpassningsbidragen [Home modification grants]. Boverket, Karlskrona, Sweden.Google Scholar
Cheek, J., Ballantyne, A. and Roder-Allen, G. 2005. Factors influencing the decision of older people living in independent units to enter the acute care system. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 3a, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutchin, M. P. 2003. The process of mediated aging-in-place: a theoretically and empirically based model. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 6, 1077–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Haak, M., Fänge, A. and Iwarsson, S. 2007. The multiple meaning of home as experienced by very old Swedish people. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14, 1, 25–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Femia, E. E., Zarit, S. E. and Johansson, B. 2001. The disablement process in very late life: a study of the oldest-old in Sweden. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56, 1, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fonad, E., Robin Wahlin, T.-B., Heikkilä, K. and Emami, A. 2006. Moving to and living in a retirement home: focusing on elderly people's sense of safety. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20, 3, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gitlin, L. N. 2003. Conducting research on home environments: lessons learned and new directions. Gerontologist, 43, 5, 628–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gitlin, L. N., Swenson Miller, K. and Boyce, A. 1999. Bathroom modifications for frail elderly renters: outcomes of a community-based program. Technology and Disability, 10, 3, 141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustavsson, A. 1996. Att förstå människor – Tillämpning av den formella datastrukturanalysen [To Understand People – Application of the Formal Data Structure Analysis]. Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Haak, M., Fänge, A., Iwarsson, S. and Dahlin-Ivanoff, S. 2007. Home as a signification of independence and autonomy: experiences among very old Swedish people. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14, 1, 16–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Häggblom-Kronlöf, G. and Sonn, U. 1999. Elderly women's way of relating to assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 10, 3, 161–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. 1996. Living a meaningful existence in old age. In Zemke, R. and Clarke, F. (eds), Occupational Science – The Evolving Discipline. FA Davis Company, Philadelphia, 339–61.Google Scholar
Jagger, C., Arthur, A. J., Spiers, N. A. and Clarke, M. 2001. Patterns of onset of disability in activities of daily living with age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 4, 404–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Johannesen, A., Petersen, J. and Avlund, K. 2004. Satisfaction in everyday life for frail 85-year-old adults: a Danish population study. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 11, 1, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, K. and Velkoff, V. A. 2001. An Ageing World: 2001. National Institute on Ageing and US Census Bureau, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Lilja, M. 2002. Riktlinjer för användning av Client-Clinician Assessment Protocol (C-CAP). [Guidelines for Using the Client-Clinician Assessment Protocol (C-CAP)]. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Ödman, P.-J. 2007. Tolkning, förståelse, vetande: Hermeneutik i teori och praktik [Interpretation, Understanding, Knowledge: Hermeneutics in Theory and Practice]. Nordstedts, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Petersson, I., Fisher, A., Hemmingsson, H. and Lilja, M. 2007. The Client-Clinician Assessment Protocol (C-CAP) Part I: evaluation of its psychometric properties for use with people aging with disabilities in need of home modifications. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 27, 4, 140–8.Google Scholar
Petersson, I., Lilja, M., Hammel, J. and Kottorp, A. 2008. The impact of home modification services on ability in daily life for people aging with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 4, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowles, G. D. 2000. Habituation and being in place. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 20, 1, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, R. L. 1989. The home environment of older people: a description of the psychosocial processes: linking person to place. Journal of Gerontology, 44, 2, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Socialdepartementet 2008. Äldres boende [Elder Living]. Regeringskansliet, Stockholm. Available online at www.regeringen.se/sb/d/8088 [Accessed 30 January 2008].Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen 2003. Att arbeta med äldres rehabilitering – Arbetsterapeuter och sjukgymnaster om sitt arbete med äldre [Working with Rehabilitation of the Elderly – Occupational Therapists and Physiotherapists Describe Their Work with the Elderly]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Socialstyrelsen 2008. Vård och omsorg om äldre. Lägesrapporter 2007 [Health Care for the Elderly. Interim Reports 2007]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Stark, S. 2003. Home modifications that enable occupational performance. In Letts, L., Rigby, P. and Stewart, D. (eds), Using Environments to Enable Occupational Performance. SLACK Incorporated, Thorofare, New Jersey, 219–34.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
Svensk Författningssamling SFS 1992:1574 1992. Lag om bostadsanpassningsbidrag mm [Swedish Act on Home Modification Grants, etc.]. Svensk Författningssamling, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Vik, K., Lilja, M. and Nygård, L. 2007. The influence of the environment on participation subsequent to rehabilitation as experienced by elderly people in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14, 2, 86–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, D. T. 1992. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google ScholarPubMed
Wahl, H.-W., Fänge, A., Oswald, F., Gtilin, L. and Iwarsson, S. 2009. The home environment and disability-related outcomes in aging individuals: what is the empirical evidence? The Gerontologist, 49, 3, 355–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, A. F., Russell, A. and Powers, J. R. 2004. The sense of belonging to a neighbourhood: can it be measured and is it related to health and well-being in older woman? Social Science & Medicine, 59, 12, 2627–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziersch, A. M., Baum, F. E., MacDougall, C. and Putland, C. 2005. Neighbourhood life and social capital: the implications for health. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed