Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:27:19.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrative construction of resilience: stories of older Czech adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

EVA DUBOVSKÁ ,
VLADIMÍR CHRZ ,
PETER TAVEL ,
IVA POLÁČKOVÁ ŠOLCOVÁ  and
JIŘÍ RŮŽIČKA
EVA DUBOVSKÁ*
Affiliation:
Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
VLADIMÍR CHRZ
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
PETER TAVEL
Affiliation:
Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
IVA POLÁČKOVÁ ŠOLCOVÁ
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
JIŘÍ RŮŽIČKA
Affiliation:
Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, Czech Republic.
*
Address for correspondence: Eva Dubovská, Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University, Univerzitní 22, 771 11 Olomouc, Czech Republic E-mail: eva.dubovska@oushi.upol.cz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some older adults handle the pitfalls of ageing better than others. One explanation emerges from the concept of resilience, the ability to bounce back from the adversities of later life. In this study, we approached resilience from the narrative perspective. This study is a part of a project based on the DIPEx qualitative methodology, focused on different aspects of ageing. A combination of narrative and semi-structured interviews was conducted with 50 older adults (aged 75 and over). From the total number of interviews, a sub-group of 11 resilient participants was selected on the basis of the criteria set for resilience: (a) past exposure to adversity; and (b) positive adaptation to this adversity in terms of quality of life, happiness and activity. The results of the analysis are presented in the framework of five categories: (a) thematic lines, (b) agency and positioning; (c) values and beliefs; (d) reflections and perspectives; and (e) plot and genre. Both agency and reflections point to actively resisting old age as an important characteristic of resilient older adults in the Czech Republic. This resistance is often allied with irony, but we have also found genres of heroic coping and affirmation of lucky moments. Key thematic lines were love of life, emphasis on the importance of movement and positive social relationships; key values expressed by the participants were relational, existential and spiritual.

Keywords

resilienceageingolder adultsnarrativenarrative gerontologyagency
Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 37 , Issue 9 , October 2017 , pp. 1849 - 1873
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, J. M., Wagner, J. W. and McAdams, D. P. 2007. Personality and the coherence of psychotherapy narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 6, 1179–98.Google Scholar
Adler, M. 2004. The genre of client's story in psychotherapy. Československá Psychologie, 48, 1, 84–92.Google Scholar
Antonovsky, A. 1993. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36, 6, 725–33.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P. 1997. Narrative turn or blind alley? Qualitative Health Research, 7, 3, 325–44.Google Scholar
Baerger, D. R. and McAdams, D. P. 1999. Life story coherence and its relation to psychological well-being. Narrative Inquiry, 9, 1, 69–96.Google Scholar
Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E. and Donnellan, M. B. 2010. Life satisfaction across the lifespan: findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 2, 183–203.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. M. and Carstensen, L. L. 1996. The process of successful ageing. Ageing & Society, 16, 4, 397–422.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. 1997. A constructivist approach to narrative development. In Bamberg, M. (ed.), Narrative Development: Six Approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 85–132.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. 2005. Positioning. In Herman, D., Manfred, J. and Marie-Laure, R. (eds), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Routledge, London, 588–9.Google Scholar
Bohlmeijer, E. T., Westerhof, G. J., Randall, W., Tromp, T. and Kenyon, G. 2011. Narrative foreclosure in later life: preliminary considerations for a new sensitizing concept. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 4, 364–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonanno, G. A. 2004. Loss, trauma, and human resilience – have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 1, 20–8.Google Scholar
Bonanno, G. A. 2005. Resilience in the face of potential trauma. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 3, 135–8.Google Scholar
Bottrell, D. 2007. Resistance, resilience and social identities: reframing ‘problem youth’ and the problem of schooling. Journal of Youth Studies, 10, 5, 597–616.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1996. The Culture of Education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. 1999. Narratives of aging. Journal of Aging Studies, 13, 1, 7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. 2004. Life as narrative. Social Research, 71, 3, 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. and Mikels, J. A. 2005. At the intersection of emotion and cognition – aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 3, 117–21.Google Scholar
Charles, S. T. and Carstensen, L. L. 2010. Social and emotional aging. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 383–409.Google Scholar
Chrz, V. 2004. Research as narrative re-construction. In Miovsky, M., Čermák, I. and Rehan, V. (eds), Kvalitativní přístup a metody ve vědách o člověku III. Nakladatelstvi Univerzity Palackeho, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 21–32.Google Scholar
Chrz, V. 2006. Cancer, finitude and life configuration. In Milnes, K., Horrocks, C., Kelly, N., Roberts, B. and Robinson, D. (eds), Narrative, Memory and Knowledge: Representations, Aesthetics and Contexts. Fifth edition, University of Huddersfield Press, Huddersfield, UK, 149–58.Google Scholar
Chrz, V. and Čermák, I. 2005. Genres of stories we live by. Československá Psychologie, 49, 6, 481–95.Google Scholar
Chrz, V. and Čermák, I. 2015. Narrative complexity. Československá Psychologie, 59, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Dingley, C. and Roux, G. 2014. The role of inner strength in quality of life and self-management in women survivors of cancer. Research in Nursing & Health, 37, 1, 32–41.Google Scholar
Epston, D., White, M. and Murray, K. 1992. A proposal for a re-authoring therapy: Rose's revisioning of her life and a commentary. In McNamee, S. and Gergen, K. J. (eds), Therapy as Social Construction. Inquiries in Social Construction Series, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage, 96–115.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. 1998. The Life Cycle Completed. Extended version, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
Frankl, V. E. 1988. The Will to Meaning: Foundations and Applications of Logotherapy. Meridian/Plume, New York.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. 2010. Narrative foreclosure in later life: possibilities and limits. In Kenyon, G., Bohlmeijer, E. and Randall, W. L. (eds), Storying Later Life: Issues, Investigations, and Interventions in Narrative Gerontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3–19.Google Scholar
Frye, N. 2000. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. 2004. Truth and Method. Bloomsbury Academic, London.Google Scholar
Gattuso, S. 2003. Becoming a wise old woman: resilience and wellness in later life. Health Sociology Review, 12, 2, 171–7.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. 2006. Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 1, 122–30.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. 1997. Narrative, Moral Identity and Historical Consciousness: A Social Constructionist Account. Swarthmore College. Available online at https://www.swarthmore.edu/sites/default/files/assets/documents/kenneth-gergen/Narrative_Moral_Identity_and_Historical_Consciousness.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2015].Google Scholar
Harris, P. B. 2008. Another wrinkle in the debate about successful aging: the undervalued concept of resilience and the lived experience of dementia. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 67, 1, 43–61.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time. SUNY Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hicks, M. M. and Conner, N. E. 2014. Resilient ageing: a concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 4, 744–55.Google Scholar
Hofer, J., Bush, H., Au, A., Poláčková Šolcová, I., Tavel, P. and Tsien Wong, T. 2014. For the benefit of others: generativity and meaning in life in the elderly in four cultures. Psychology and Aging, 29, 4, 764–75.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, L. 2005. Reflexivity. In Herman, D., Manfred, J. and Marie-Laure, R. (eds), Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Routledge, London, 645–46.Google Scholar
Kenyon, G. 2004. The meaning/value of personal storytelling. In Birren, J. E., Kenyon, G. and Jan-Erik, R. (eds), Aging and Biography: Explorations in Adult Development. Springer, New York, 21–39.Google Scholar
Kenyon, G., Randall, W. L. and Bohlmeijer, E. 2010. Preface. In Kenyon, G., Bohlmeijer, E. and Randall, W. L. (eds), Storying Later Life: Issues, Investigations, and Interventions in Narrative Gerontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 13–18.Google Scholar
Kobasa, S. C. 1979. Stressful life events, personality, and health – inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
Kobasa, S. C., Maddi, S. R. and Kahn, S. 1982. Hardiness and health – a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1, 168–77.Google Scholar
Lundman, B., Alex, L., Jonsen, E., Norberg, A., Nygren, B., Fischer, R. S. and Strandberg, G. 2010. Inner strength – a theoretical analysis of salutogenic concepts. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47, 2, 251–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansfield, E. D. and McAdams, D. P. 1996. Generativity and themes of agency and communion in adult autobiography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 7, 721–31.Google Scholar
Martinson, M. and Berridge, C. 2015. Successful aging and its discontents: a systematic review of the social gerontology literature. Gerontologist, 55, 1, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, A. S. 2001. Ordinary magic – resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 3, 227–38.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. 1996. Personality, modernity, and the storied self: a contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 4, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P. 1997. The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. The Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. 2010. Personal narratives and the life story. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W. and Pervin, L. A. (eds), Handbook of Personality. Theory and Research. Third edition, The Guilford Press, New York, 242–62.Google Scholar
McCullough, L. 1993. Arrested aging: the power of the past to make us aged and old. In Cole, T., Achenbaum, W., Jakobi, P. and Kastenbaum, R. (eds), Voices and Visions of Aging: Toward a Critical Gerontology. Springer, New York, 184–204.Google Scholar
Murray, K. D. 1989. The construction of identity in the narratives of romance and comedy. In Shotter, J. and Gergen, K. (eds), Texts of Identity. Sage, London, 176–205.Google Scholar
Nakashima, M. and Canda, E. R. 2005. Positive dying and resiliency in later life: a qualitative study. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 1, 109–25.Google Scholar
Randall, W. L. 2013 a. Aging, irony, and wisdom: on the narrative psychology of later life. Theory & Psychology, 23, 2, 164–83.Google Scholar
Randall, W. L. 2013 b. The importance of being ironic: narrative openness and personal resilience in later life. Gerontologist, 53, 1, 9–16.Google Scholar
Randall, W., Baldwin, C., McKenzie-Mohr, S., McKim, E. and Furlong, D. 2015. Narrative and resilience: a comparative analysis of how older adults story their lives. Journal of Aging Studies, 34, 1, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, W. L. and McKim, E. 2008. Reading Our Lives: The Poetics of Growing Old: Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Říčan, P. and Jánošová, P. 2010. Spirituality as a basic aspect of personality: a cross-cultural verification of Piedmont's model. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 20, 1, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, G. E. 2002. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 3, 307–21.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. C., Grime, J. C. and Ong, B. N. 2014. ‘Keeping going’: chronic joint pain in older people who describe their health as good. Ageing & Society, 34, 8, 1380–96.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. W. and Kahn, R. L. 1997. Successful aging. Gerontologist, 37, 4, 433–40.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. 1989. Beyond Deleon, Ponce and life satisfaction – new directions in quest of successful aging. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 1, 35–55.Google Scholar
Sagy, S. and Antonovsky, A. 1992. The family sense of coherence and the retirement transition. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 4, 983–93.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. 2000. Many reasons speak against it, yet many people feel good: the paradox of subjective well-being. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 4, 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidovicova, L. 2008. Stárnutí, věk a diskriminace [Ageing, Age and Discrimination]. Mezinárodní Politologický Ústav, Prague.Google Scholar
Wagnild, G. M. and Young, H. M. 1993. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1, 2, 165–78.Google Scholar
Wiesmann, U. and Hannich, H. J. 2014. A salutogenic analysis of the well-being paradox in older age. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 2, 339–55.Google Scholar
Wild, K., Wiles, J. L. and Allen, R. E. S. 2013. Resilience: thoughts on the value of the concept for critical gerontology. Ageing & Society, 33, 1, 137–58.Google Scholar
Wiles, J. L., Wild, K., Kerse, N. and Allen, R. E. S. 2012. Resilience from the point of view of older people: ‘There's still life beyond a funny knee’. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 3, 416–24.Google Scholar
Ziebland, S. and Wyke, S. 2012. Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people's health? Milbank Quarterly, 90, 2, 219–49.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, H. P. and Grebe, H. 2014. ‘Senior coolness’: living well as an attitude in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 28, 1, 22–34.Google Scholar