Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:35:16.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructing ageing and age identities: a case study of newspaper discourses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2011

GERARD FEALY*
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Ireland.
MARTIN McNAMARA
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Ireland.
MARGARET PEARL TREACY
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Ireland.
IMOGEN LYONS
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Ireland.
*
Address for correspondence: Gerard Fealy, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland. E-mail: Gerard.Fealy@ucd.ie

Abstract

Public discourses concerning older people are available in a variety of texts, including popular media, and these discourses position older people with particular age identities. This study examined discursive formations of ageing and age identities in print media in Ireland. Constituting a single media event, newspaper texts concerned with revised welfare provision for older people were subjected to critical discourse analysis and revealed particular ways of naming and referencing older people and distinct constructions of ageing and age identities. The use of nouns and phrases to name and reference older people positioned them as a distinct demographic group and a latent ageism was discernible in texts that deployed collective names like ‘grannies and grandads’ and ‘little old ladies’. Five distinct identity types were available in the texts, variously constructing older people as ‘victims’; ‘frail, infirm and vulnerable’; ‘radicalised citizens’; ‘deserving old’ and ‘undeserving old’. The discourses made available subject positions that collectively produced identities of implied dependency and otherness, thereby placing older people outside mainstream Irish society. The proposition that older people might be healthy, self-reliant and capable of autonomous living was largely absent in the discourses. Newspaper discourses betray taken-for-granted assumptions and reveal dominant social constructions of ageing and age identity that have consequences for older people's behaviour and for the way that society behaves towards them.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, S. and Hardy, C. 2007. The construction of the older worker: privilege, paradox and policy. Discourse and Communication, 1, 3, 267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, S. 2005. Beyond appearances: perspectives on identity in later life and some implications for method. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60B, 3, S118–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodner, E. and Lazar, A. 2008. Ageism among Israeli students: structure and demographic influences. International Psychogeriatrics, 20, 5, 1046–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonnesen, J. L. and Burgess, E. O. 2004. Senior moments: the acceptability of an ageist phrase. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 2, 123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bytheway, B. 2005. Age-identities and the celebration of birthdays. Ageing & Society, 25, 4, 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly-Ahern, C. and Broadway, S. C. 2009. ‘To booze or not to booze’: newspaper coverage of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Science Communication, 29, 3, 362–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, J. 2009 a. Discourse, identity and change in mid-to-late life: interdisciplinary perspectives on language and ageing. Ageing & Society, 29, 6, 849–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, J. 2009 b. Time, the body and the reversibility of ageing: commodifying the decade. Ageing & Society, 29, 6, 953–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I. and Fiske, S. T. 2005. This old stereotype: the stubbornness and pervasiveness of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 2, 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edley, N. 2001. Analysing masculinity: interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S. J. (eds), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Sage Publications, London, 189228.Google Scholar
Edley, N. and Wetherell, M. 1997. Jockeying for position: the construction of masculine identities. Discourse and Society, 8, 2, 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, Harrow, UK.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fealy, G. M. and McNamara, M. S. 2007. A discourse analysis of debates surrounding the entry of nursing into higher education in Ireland. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 7, 1187–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frewin, K., Pond, R. and Tuffin, K. 2009. Sexual abuse, counselling and compensation: discourses in New Zealand newspapers. Feminism and Psychology, 19, 1, 2947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamliel, T. and Hazan, H. 2009. The meaning of stigma: identity construction in two old-age institutions. Ageing & Society, 29, 6, 355–71.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Second edition, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Government of Ireland 2001. Health Act. Stationery Office, Dublin.Google Scholar
Harbison, J. and Morrow, M. 1998. Re-examining the social construction of elder abuse and neglect: a Canadian perspective. Ageing & Society, 18, 6, 691711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J. 2008. Age identity and communication. In Donsbach, W. (ed.), The International Encyclopaedia of Communication. Volume 1, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts, 136–40.Google Scholar
Hazan, H. 1994. Old Age Constructions and Deconstructions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugman, R. 1999. Embodying old age. In Teather, E. K. (ed.), Embodied Geographies: Spaces, Bodies and Rites of Passage. Routledge, London, 193207.Google Scholar
Madill, A. 2006. Exploring psychotherapy with discourse analysis: chipping away at the mortar. In Fischer, C. T. (ed.), Qualitative Research Methods for Psychologists: Introduction Through Empirical Studies. Academic Press, New York, 2358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., Williams, C. and O'Neill, D. 2009. Retrospective analysis of attitudes to ageing in the Economist: apocalyptic demography for opinion formers? British Medical Journal, 339, b4914, 1435–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, P. N., Miller, D. W., McKibbin, E. M. and Pettys, G. L. 1999. Stereotypes of the elderly in magazine advertisements, 1956–1996. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 49, 4, 319–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, E. 2004. Older People and Ageing Issues in Irish Newspapers: A Preliminary Analysis. Age and Opportunity, Dublin.Google Scholar
Nikander, P. 2009. Doing change and continuity: age identity and the micro–macro divide. Ageing & Society, 29, 6, 863–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, J. F. and Coupland, J. (eds)2004. Second Edition. Handbook of Communication and Aging Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, R. 2001. Gender, race, age and fear in the city. Urban Studies, 38, 5/6, 899913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, S. 2009. Governing old age: the ‘case managed’ older person. Sociology, 43, 1, 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. L. 2001. Theorizing gerontology: the case of old age, professional power, and social policy in the United Kingdom. Journal of Aging and Identity, 6, 3, 117–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. L. and Wahidin, A. 2008. Understanding old age and victimisation: a critical exploration. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 28, 3/4, 90–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. E. 2007. Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. and Skill, T. 1995. Media usage, patterns and portrayals of the elderly. In Nussbaum, J. F. and Coupland, J. (eds), Handbook of Communication and Aging Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, 359–92.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. 2001. Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S. and Yates, S. J. (eds), Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. Sage Publications, London, 5–21.Google Scholar
Thompson, N. 1998. The ontology of ageing. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5, 695707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherell, M. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 3, 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar