Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:50:28.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Becoming a Grandparent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Sarah Cunningham-Burley
Affiliation:
MRC Medical Sociology Unit, 6 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8QQ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Focusing on a neglected area of the life cycle, this paper explores the meaning and significance of becoming a grandparent, from the perspective of a sample of couples, becoming grandparents for the first time.

The paper falls into four sections. The first considers why grand-parenthood has been a neglected area in family sociology and in research on the life cycle. The second and third sections use interview data from a prospective study of eighteen couples. The first of these briefly documents the process of becoming a grandparent, from the time when the news is first heard, through the birth of the baby and up to nine months later. The second of these identifies the meaning and significance which these people attached to ‘becoming a grandparent’ and to the role of‘being a grandparent’. The final section discusses the problems which are involved in studying grandparenthood, and in attempting to provide an account of its meaning and significance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1986 , pp. 453 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Bengtson, V. L. and Robertson, J. F. (eds.), Grandparenthood, California Sage Publications 1985.Google Scholar

2 Neugarten, B. and Weinstein, K. ‘The changing American grandparent’, in Neugarten, B. (ed.), Middle Age and Aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1968.Google ScholarPubMed

3 Crawford, M., Not Disengaged: grandparents in literature and reality. Sociological review, 29, 3 (1981), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Bengtson, V. L. and Robertson, J. F. (eds.) op. cit.Google Scholar

5 Rapoport, R., Rapoport, R., and Strelitz, Z. with Kew, S., Fathers, Mothers and Others. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1977.Google Scholar

6 Brehm, , Sociology and ageing: orientation and research. Gerontologist, 8, (1968), 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7 Rimmer, L.Families in Focus. Study Commission on the Family, London, Occasional Paper No. 6 (1981).Google Scholar

8 Kahana, E. and Coe, R. M., Perceptions of grandparenthood by community and institutionalised aged. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, (1969), 735–736.Google Scholar

9 Robertson, J. F., Interaction in three generation families, parents as mediators: toward a theoretical perspective. Aging and Human Development, 6, 2 (1975), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Kahana, B. and Kahana, E., Grandparenthood from the perspective of the developing grandchild. Development Psychology, 3, 1 (1970), 98–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 The study was conducted under a SSRC Studentship (1979–82) at the University of Aberdeen, Institute of Medical Sociology.

12 Morgan, D. J. H., The Family, Politics and Social Theory. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1985.Google Scholar

13 Cunningham-Burley, S., ‘We don't talk about it …’ Sociology, 18, 3 (1984 a), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Cunningham-Burley, S., Rules, roles and communicative performance in qualitative research interviews. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 5, 4 (1985 b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Cunningham-Burley, S., Constructing parenthood: anticipating appropriate action. Sociology, 19, 3 (1985 a), 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Cunningham-Burley, S., On telling the news. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 4, 4 (1984 b), 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 The notation used to identify a respondent couple, or respondent, makes reference to whether the couple or respondent are maternal or paternal grandparents (e.g. Mat GP, or Pat GF), and also the couple's number (main study: 2a, 3b, etc.), or letter (pilot study: A, B etc.), and to the interview number (i, ii, iii).

18 Burton, L. M. and Bengtson, V. L., ‘Black grandmothers: issues of timing and continuity’, in Bengtson, and Robertson, (1985).Google Scholar

19 Mrs Logan is referring here to her older daughter who by the time of the interview was expecting the second grandchild. The younger daughter, expecting the first grandchild, had been married for five years.

20 This term is used by Schutz (1971, Collected WorksGoogle Scholar, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff ) to refer to those aspects of future actions containing empty, unknown elements.

21 Cunningham-Burley, S., Constructing grandparenthood: anticipating appropriate action. Sociology, 19, 3 (1985 a), 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Schwartz, H. and Jacobs, J.Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness. The Free Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar

23 Garfinkel, H.Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1967.Google Scholar